rosmo.

rosmo. — CS2 Stats

76561198057510137[U:1:97244409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,519Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,473Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86023 of 238513 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 14 days played since 7 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,473 +48 7 Sept22 Sept · 15 days played
17,91220,100peak 20,1007 Sept22 Sept
20,358Peak Premier in tracked matches
14Days played since 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 627 below peak (20,100)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 527 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrosmo.FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,473 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning58
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time561ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 543ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 11 Sept
42%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 19 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 10 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 20 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 12nukeWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A37211657%0.01
infernoB23111248%0.00
cacheA127558%0.01
anubisB115645%-0.00
nukeC94544%-0.00
mirageB63350%-0.01
ancient1010%-0.01
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke475%1.3017.3
Inferno367%0.9615.3
Ancient333%0.7212.3
Mirage250%0.9714.0
Dust22100%1.3813.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.3%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
554msReaction time
56.8%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
10.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.203% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0324%22 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0340%21 Sept
anubis13–60.009%21 Sept
dust213–60.0022%21 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0626%21 Sept
cache4–13-0.0324%21 Sept
cache10–13-0.0638%20 Sept
inferno13–70.0329%20 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0120%20 Sept
inferno13–10.0815%20 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0215%20 Sept
dust213–80.0917%20 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0119%20 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0330%20 Sept
nuke13–90.0534%20 Sept
dust27–130.0324%20 Sept
mirage8–130.0042%19 Sept
nuke13–30.0024%19 Sept
inferno16–130.0229%18 Sept
dust213–30.0626%18 Sept
dust213–30.0024%18 Sept
inferno10–130.0427%18 Sept
cache13–110.0220%18 Sept
dust216–13-0.0025%18 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0224%17 Sept
dust213–110.0427%17 Sept
dust210–130.0014%17 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0422%17 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0415%17 Sept
dust213–16-0.0519%17 Sept
dust213–10-0.0338%17 Sept
dust23–13-0.0223%17 Sept
nuke5–130.0219%17 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0518%17 Sept
dust213–30.0117%17 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0433%17 Sept
dust23–2-0.028%17 Sept
cache13–60.0222%17 Sept
nuke13–100.0116%16 Sept
inferno13–80.0730%16 Sept
dust213–8-0.0030%16 Sept
anubis13–60.1437%16 Sept
dust211–130.0329%16 Sept
dust212–120.0326%16 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0117%16 Sept
cache7–130.0120%16 Sept
nuke11–130.0020%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.1115%15 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0421%15 Sept
cache13–7-0.0022%15 Sept
dust26–13-0.0425%15 Sept
dust213–100.0123%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0414%14 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0030%14 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0119%14 Sept
dust210–13-0.0223%14 Sept
dust26–130.000%14 Sept
inferno13–160.0422%13 Sept
dust213–30.0526%13 Sept
train5–13-0.0336%13 Sept
cache11–13-0.0230%13 Sept
dust213–100.0437%13 Sept
mirage2–9-0.070%13 Sept
dust213–70.0523%12 Sept
cache13–110.0417%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0328%12 Sept
dust212–120.0427%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0633%12 Sept
dust215–15-0.0232%12 Sept
dust29–13-0.0617%12 Sept
inferno13–100.0932%12 Sept
dust213–100.0431%12 Sept
dust213–5-0.0338%12 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0532%11 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0510%11 Sept
dust215–150.0223%11 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0921%11 Sept
cache13–6-0.0218%11 Sept
cache13–40.1222%11 Sept
dust213–30.1635%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0734%11 Sept
dust216–140.0424%11 Sept
mirage13–50.0733%11 Sept
anubis1–130.0238%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0038%10 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0616%10 Sept
inferno11–130.0224%10 Sept
dust213–70.0018%10 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0418%10 Sept
cache13–110.0215%10 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0338%10 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0320%10 Sept
nuke7–0-0.030%10 Sept
mirage13–80.0431%10 Sept
anubis10–130.0226%10 Sept
dust210–130.0024%9 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0522%9 Sept
dust213–7-0.0012%9 Sept
cache7–13-0.0435%9 Sept
dust213–9-0.0227%9 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →