✪nAIZzz

✪nAIZzz — CS2 Stats

ZW76561198056993999[U:1:96728271]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,179Tracked matches58%Win rate2022Tracked since
5,277Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,003Top 25% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30674 of 247978 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,003 +1,180 31 Aug – 2 Oct · 28 days played
20,14024,699peak 24,69931 Aug2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,592 +0 31 Aug – 4 Sept · 4 observations
1,5921,592peak 1,59231 Aug4 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,592Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 696 below peak (24,699)
  • +1,339 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 997 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate42.3%48.2%50.9%8.6% short
Shot accuracy14.9%13.3%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.211.071.09above
Match win rate43.5%46.9%48.4%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪nAIZzzFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,003 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,592csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning67
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–45–7Last 10048%Win rateLTLLWLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 8–8–4 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact7.6

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 24 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · nuke, 11 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 24 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18dust2Weakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2512–1348%0.03
mirageA1811–761%0.01
cacheB157–847%0.01
dust2C135–838%-0.00
infernoB136–746%-0.02
ancientC125–742%0.01
nuke—31–233%-0.04
office—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

172,504Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
8,111Matches
43.5%Match win rate
42.3%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17,603MVPs
2,887Hours (in match)
5,810Bombs planted
1,840Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,431
AWP26,410
P904,196
Tec-93,485
P2503,251

Lifetime map wins

16,212dust2
4,421inferno
2,841nuke
1,124cbble
1,119train
775vertigo
340office
277safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

467Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9951%1.1817.6
Anubis9359%1.2517.3
Dust26343%1.0315.3
Ancient6149%1.0716.4
Inferno3152%1.1116.7
Nuke3165%1.0618.3
Overpass2458%1.3118.2
Vertigo2167%1.0215.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
60.1%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
13.36HE damage / grenade
11.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4803 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.0326%2 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0029%2 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.028%2 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0111%1 Oct →
anubis13–100.0515%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0226%1 Oct →
anubis15–150.0023%1 Oct →
mirage13–90.0222%1 Oct →
inferno13–100.0119%30 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0717%30 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0316%30 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0112%30 Sept →
dust215–150.0029%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.0414%28 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0112%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0323%27 Sept →
dust22–130.0430%27 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0519%27 Sept →
mirage13–70.0321%27 Sept →
anubis15–150.0218%26 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0610%26 Sept →
office13–110.0428%25 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0010%25 Sept →
anubis16–140.0524%25 Sept →
anubis13–20.1325%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.0412%24 Sept →
dust210–130.0522%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0623%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0519%23 Sept →
mirage13–70.0424%23 Sept →
inferno8–130.0525%23 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0211%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0429%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0421%22 Sept →
mirage13–70.0625%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0132%22 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0313%21 Sept →
mirage10–130.0419%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0226%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.0214%21 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0718%20 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0421%20 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0025%20 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0718%19 Sept →
cache11–130.0318%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.0824%19 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0211%19 Sept →
anubis13–110.0718%19 Sept →
anubis13–50.1122%19 Sept →
anubis10–130.0118%18 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0232%18 Sept →
anubis13–80.0218%18 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0420%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0229%18 Sept →
dust213–60.0732%18 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0127%18 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0126%18 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0133%18 Sept →
anubis13–80.0515%17 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0517%17 Sept →
anubis13–160.0825%17 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0216%17 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0132%17 Sept →
ancient13–80.0116%17 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0619%17 Sept →
anubis13–60.056%17 Sept →
dust25–13-0.089%17 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0521%13 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0219%13 Sept →
cache5–130.0114%13 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0122%12 Sept →
ancient13–90.0831%12 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0336%11 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0412%11 Sept →
anubis11–130.0320%10 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0614%10 Sept →
cache13–110.009%10 Sept →
ancient14–160.0718%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0223%9 Sept →
anubis8–130.0824%8 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0234%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0029%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0218%8 Sept →
ancient13–110.0323%8 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0022%7 Sept →
anubis13–30.1125%7 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0516%7 Sept →
cache15–150.0418%7 Sept →
mirage13–60.0218%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0112%7 Sept →
mirage13–110.0421%6 Sept →
anubis11–130.1022%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.039%6 Sept →
cache12–160.0320%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0220%4 Sept →
cache5–6-0.0720%4 Sept →
anubis13–80.0310%3 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0328%3 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0021%2 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0423%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.