Relania

Relania — CS2 Stats

76561198055318245[U:1:95052517]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,250Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,708Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−379Premier CS Rating · 19,087 → 18,708

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,708 -3,680 1 Sept – 4 Nov · 25 days played
18,33022,388peak 22,3881 Sept4 Nov
22,388Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,314Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,680 below peak (22,388)
  • -1,852 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,292 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRelaniaFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,708 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,314csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning63
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time565ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 21 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · ancient, 13 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 15 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 77% over 13nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2312–1152%-0.01
infernoB2210–1245%-0.00
ancientS1310–377%0.01
cacheA127–558%0.02
anubisB126–650%0.00
nukeD93–633%-0.02
mirageA95–456%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

335Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24959%1.0615.4
Anubis4139%1.0715.1
Ancient3951%1.1116.1
Mirage3546%0.9112.5
Inferno3155%1.0914.9
Nuke1867%0.9413.2
Train617%0.9416.0
Cache4100%1.5815.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
558msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
62.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
7.49HE damage / grenade
8.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0321%4 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0015%3 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0811%3 Nov →
inferno16–12-0.0213%1 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0211%1 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0419%1 Nov →
anubis13–100.0416%1 Nov →
dust211–130.0313%1 Nov →
anubis13–11-0.0215%1 Nov →
inferno13–20.0912%30 Oct →
anubis7–130.0119%30 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0313%29 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0019%29 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0215%29 Oct →
dust213–40.0716%29 Oct →
inferno1–8-0.090%29 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0118%29 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0218%27 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0211%27 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0414%26 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0118%26 Oct →
mirage13–90.0917%26 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0621%26 Oct →
cache4–130.0226%26 Oct →
dust213–90.0614%25 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0117%25 Oct →
mirage13–100.0118%25 Oct →
inferno13–100.0321%25 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.039%24 Oct →
cache13–90.0025%24 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0113%24 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0116%24 Oct →
cache13–20.0930%24 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0914%24 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0312%23 Oct →
cache13–100.038%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0417%23 Oct →
anubis16–120.0417%23 Oct →
dust214–160.0317%23 Oct →
ancient16–140.018%23 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0320%23 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.037%23 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0525%23 Oct →
inferno11–130.0220%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0412%22 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.079%22 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.057%22 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0514%22 Oct →
nuke13–30.0618%22 Oct →
cache13–30.016%21 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0512%21 Oct →
ancient13–80.1324%21 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0112%21 Oct →
inferno16–130.0916%19 Oct →
anubis6–130.1114%19 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0313%18 Oct →
mirage13–10.0720%18 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0116%17 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0311%17 Oct →
ancient13–160.0223%17 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0111%17 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0023%17 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0212%15 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0120%15 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0615%15 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0223%15 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0214%15 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0127%15 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.026%15 Oct →
dust213–100.0014%15 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.039%14 Oct →
cache13–30.1120%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0415%14 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0415%13 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0133%13 Oct →
dust213–100.0322%13 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0115%12 Oct →
ancient13–60.047%12 Oct →
inferno9–130.0328%12 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0516%11 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0529%11 Oct →
anubis13–30.0522%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0218%11 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0518%10 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0621%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0215%10 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.067%10 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.028%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0419%10 Oct →
dust25–130.0515%9 Oct →
ancient13–110.0519%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0510%9 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0414%8 Oct →
dust213–00.0326%8 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0319%8 Oct →
cache13–20.099%8 Oct →
mirage13–110.0614%8 Oct →
nuke15–150.0315%8 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.123%7 Oct →
inferno7–130.0116%7 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.