DestroyBlader

DestroyBlader — CS2 Stats

DE76561198054718646[U:1:94452918]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,952Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,364Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,902Top 25% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33264 of 258891 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+366Premier CS Rating · 23,536 → 23,902
+6Tracked matches · now 3,952
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,902 -2,569 15 May – 30 Oct · 28 days played
21,79226,486peak 26,48615 May30 Oct
26,658Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,455Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-05-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,584 below peak (26,486)
  • +163 over 30 days · steady
  • -551 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,098 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate54.4%46.9%49.3%above
Shot accuracy13.4%13.0%13.4%meets
Kill/death ratio1.111.081.12meets
Match win rate49.7%46.7%48.5%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Red band player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDestroyBladerPREMIER23,902 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,455csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −8.1pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch1.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time592ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy29.0%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 29.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 28 Jun →
63%Best headshot accuracy · 3–10 · anubis, 28 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 28 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2916–1355%0.01
cacheB2412–1250%0.01
ancientB147–750%0.02
nukeB126–650%0.02
infernoA85–363%0.01
anubisD60–60%-0.04
mirage—21–150%-0.06
rush_001—11–0100%0.11
shelter—11–0100%-0.04
fachwerk—10–10%-0.04
boulder—11–0100%0.03
warden—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

250,940Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
13,291Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band
54.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Pink band
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
33,914MVPs
5,229Hours (in match)
6,604Bombs planted
2,543Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4791,950
AWP28,862
MP94,991
Negev3,732
P2503,574

Lifetime map wins

22,833dust2
12,873inferno
5,684nuke
5,381cbble
2,858train
2,075vertigo
1,432office
576italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,431Matches
53%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
80.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9348%1.0116.0
Dust28956%1.1216.2
Inferno6260%1.0916.7
Nuke5562%1.1415.1
Anubis3551%0.9816.1
Mirage1953%0.9613.7
Train1958%1.0215.0
Overpass1867%1.1616.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.9%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
587msReaction time
51.7%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
6.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.5888% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0819%30 Oct →
cache13–20.0833%29 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0121%29 Oct →
inferno13–30.0216%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0127%29 Oct →
dust213–70.0426%29 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0324%29 Oct →
cache13–110.0534%29 Oct →
dust27–130.0518%25 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0518%23 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0720%22 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0232%22 Oct →
dust210–130.0033%18 Oct →
cache2–130.0118%3 Oct →
cache0–13-0.0454%3 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0313%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0128%1 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0428%1 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0750%1 Oct →
rush_0014–00.1140%30 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0225%23 Sept →
cache14–16-0.077%23 Sept →
nuke11–130.0329%19 Sept →
dust21–9-0.0560%19 Sept →
cache13–110.0530%13 Sept →
cache13–110.0024%12 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0216%12 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0629%5 Sept →
dust210–130.0148%4 Sept →
cache7–130.0138%4 Sept →
anubis3–10-0.0563%28 Aug →
nuke13–70.0225%28 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.1112%28 Aug →
cache13–100.0225%28 Aug →
dust27–130.0522%28 Aug →
dust213–80.1042%28 Aug →
dust213–90.0432%22 Aug →
dust211–130.0412%19 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0316%7 Aug →
cache11–130.0829%7 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0214%6 Aug →
cache13–40.0321%6 Aug →
dust28–0-0.050%6 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0121%6 Aug →
nuke5–130.0435%6 Aug →
nuke13–60.0234%6 Aug →
ancient13–110.0311%5 Aug →
dust213–70.0310%5 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0532%5 Aug →
dust210–130.0013%5 Aug →
dust213–70.0235%5 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0326%5 Aug →
anubis3–130.0426%5 Aug →
ancient13–80.1127%2 Aug →
ancient6–130.0726%2 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0421%30 Jul →
ancient13–30.1121%30 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0119%30 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0127%30 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0120%30 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0221%30 Jul →
nuke13–110.0715%29 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0221%29 Jul →
dust213–60.0325%29 Jul →
cache13–50.0534%29 Jul →
ancient13–60.0320%29 Jul →
inferno13–10.1028%29 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0519%29 Jul →
ancient9–130.0425%28 Jul →
dust211–130.0814%28 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0219%26 Jul →
shelter13–2-0.0419%24 Jul →
fachwerk6–13-0.0413%24 Jul →
boulder13–90.0318%24 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0224%22 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0319%22 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0118%22 Jul →
nuke13–60.0528%22 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0539%22 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0126%22 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0314%21 Jul →
ancient9–130.0127%21 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0125%5 Jul →
nuke13–60.1137%29 Jun →
anubis12–12-0.0327%29 Jun →
cache10–130.0137%29 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0424%29 Jun →
cache13–30.1420%28 Jun →
warden13–80.0633%28 Jun →
ancient11–130.0125%28 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0521%28 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0419%22 Jun →
ancient10–130.0626%9 Jun →
dust27–130.0134%9 Jun →
inferno13–50.0730%17 May →
ancient4–13-0.0621%17 May →
dust213–100.0238%15 May →
cache9–13-0.0333%15 May →
inferno11–130.0227%15 May →
dust213–90.0628%15 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.