SmartyMartMara

SmartyMartMara — CS2 Stats

DE76561198054485212[U:1:94219484]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,073Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 24 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,408 +1,048 24 Mar24 Apr · 13 days played
13,19814,408peak 14,40824 Mar24 Apr
14,517Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-03-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSmartyMartMaraFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning49
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD424810Last 10042%Win rateLLTLLLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 172 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 4124 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.0
Utility4.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.9

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time654ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–4 · poseidon, 27 Mar
33%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 26 May
375msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · poseidon, 30 Mar
13–1Biggest win · cache, 12 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 47% over 34infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB34161847%-0.00
poseidonB28131546%-0.03
nukeC156940%-0.01
infernoD51420%0.01
anubisC52340%-0.00
ancientD51420%-0.01
mirage32167%0.03
overpass21150%0.05
eldorado1010%-0.14
debris1010%-0.00
dust21010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

103Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
642msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
6.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4919 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8052% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0221%14 Sept
eldorado2–9-0.1417%13 Sept
debris8–8-0.009%13 Sept
cache2–13-0.074%10 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0217%10 Sept
poseidon5–9-0.0713%9 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0327%9 Sept
nuke12–120.0415%9 Sept
cache6–13-0.0716%7 Sept
cache13–60.0225%7 Sept
inferno12–120.0422%7 Sept
dust213–160.0216%31 Aug
nuke13–110.0219%31 Aug
cache13–70.0011%25 Aug
nuke13–50.0819%25 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0310%25 Aug
cache7–13-0.0310%30 Jun
inferno11–130.0115%29 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0127%29 Jun
cache8–130.0619%26 Jun
mirage13–70.0915%25 Jun
inferno13–30.008%25 Jun
cache11–13-0.0012%17 Jun
cache13–10-0.028%5 Jun
cache3–130.0324%5 Jun
cache13–70.0223%3 Jun
cache7–13-0.029%3 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0620%2 Jun
nuke1–13-0.088%2 Jun
nuke7–13-0.034%2 Jun
cache13–80.0012%2 Jun
cache7–13-0.0116%2 Jun
cache5–13-0.0013%1 Jun
cache13–60.0221%1 Jun
cache13–11-0.0217%29 May
cache13–90.0923%26 May
cache1–130.0333%26 May
cache13–10.0823%12 May
cache9–13-0.017%12 May
cache1–13-0.088%7 May
cache2–13-0.0812%7 May
poseidon9–5-0.0119%6 May
poseidon9–6-0.0510%6 May
poseidon9–3-0.0711%6 May
poseidon9–6-0.086%6 May
cache13–110.0411%5 May
cache3–13-0.0612%5 May
cache13–60.039%4 May
cache6–13-0.0721%4 May
cache13–50.0013%29 Apr
cache7–130.0213%29 Apr
cache13–90.0918%29 Apr
poseidon7–9-0.0621%29 Apr
cache6–13-0.0120%29 Apr
cache13–20.0212%29 Apr
cache13–60.0412%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.086%29 Apr
cache0–13-0.120%28 Apr
poseidon8–80.0028%28 Apr
poseidon9–7-0.0419%28 Apr
poseidon8–80.0621%28 Apr
poseidon9–30.0616%28 Apr
poseidon7–9-0.1210%28 Apr
poseidon8–80.0914%28 Apr
poseidon9–50.0311%28 Apr
poseidon2–9-0.055%28 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0212%24 Apr
nuke13–9-0.049%24 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0413%23 Apr
poseidon9–30.1330%23 Apr
inferno15–150.0212%21 Apr
ancient7–130.0113%21 Apr
anubis14–16-0.019%20 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0310%16 Apr
nuke13–70.0312%15 Apr
overpass13–40.0110%15 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0216%10 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0211%8 Apr
mirage13–100.057%5 Apr
poseidon4–9-0.147%30 Mar
poseidon7–9-0.1214%30 Mar
poseidon0–9-0.240%30 Mar
poseidon9–30.078%30 Mar
anubis13–110.036%27 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0213%27 Mar
poseidon9–70.0914%27 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.0617%27 Mar
poseidon2–9-0.164%27 Mar
poseidon9–50.057%27 Mar
poseidon9–40.1414%27 Mar
overpass7–130.0824%26 Mar
ancient13–30.0017%26 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0012%25 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.019%25 Mar
poseidon7–9-0.038%25 Mar
poseidon9–7-0.0719%25 Mar
ancient13–16-0.039%25 Mar
mirage11–13-0.037%24 Mar
anubis13–5-0.016%24 Mar
poseidon5–9-0.1121%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →