MBowers

MBowers — CS2 Stats

US76561198051448342[U:1:91182614]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

4,191Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,428Top 50% of 204,056 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90373 of 251136 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,428 -77 12 Jul – 6 Oct · 33 days played
18,23521,825peak 21,82512 Jul6 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,318 +0 29 Aug – 18 Sept · 5 observations
1,3181,318peak 1,31829 Aug18 Sept
22,197Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,318Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,318
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,397 below peak (21,825)
  • +384 over 30 days · steady
  • -77 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 572 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMBowersPREMIER19,428 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,318csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning41
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility4.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time636ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 16 Aug →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · mirage, 25 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · inferno, 2 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 1 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2211–1150%-0.02
nukeB199–1047%-0.03
ancientA1710–759%-0.01
infernoC166–1038%-0.01
anubisC125–742%-0.03
cacheD72–529%-0.03
dust2A53–260%-0.04
debris—22–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,570Matches
48%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
68.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13457%0.9615.3
Anubis13243%0.9114.0
Mirage10438%0.8613.9
Nuke6459%0.8813.7
Inferno3330%0.8312.8
Vertigo3339%0.8514.9
Dust22646%0.8014.5
Overpass2556%0.8914.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
630msReaction time
22.1%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.56HE damage / grenade
7.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.1237% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0016%6 Oct →
ancient13–80.0313%6 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0431%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0413%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0013%24 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0428%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0417%23 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0217%23 Sept →
nuke3–9-0.1517%15 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0321%12 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0321%12 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0316%12 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0438%12 Sept →
ancient13–50.0526%9 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0525%9 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.018%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0116%7 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0621%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0117%7 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0216%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0324%2 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.089%27 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.1033%25 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0520%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.0344%25 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0521%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0413%22 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0811%22 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.1135%18 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0214%18 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0223%16 Aug →
ancient13–40.0715%16 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.018%16 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0318%16 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0316%16 Aug →
anubis13–80.0417%16 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0218%14 Aug →
mirage13–60.0113%14 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0316%13 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0411%13 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0617%12 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0412%12 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0418%11 Aug →
mirage11–130.0113%11 Aug →
ancient9–130.0119%11 Aug →
inferno7–130.0212%11 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0013%11 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0016%10 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0317%9 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0316%8 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0313%7 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0114%7 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0415%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0221%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0210%7 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0519%5 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0610%5 Aug →
ancient5–10.0013%5 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0121%4 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0821%4 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0112%2 Aug →
inferno6–90.0125%2 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0411%2 Aug →
inferno11–130.0012%2 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0510%1 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0215%1 Aug →
ancient13–10.0136%1 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0418%1 Aug →
inferno8–130.0321%1 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0412%31 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0113%31 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0122%31 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0511%28 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0411%28 Jul →
nuke13–50.0615%28 Jul →
mirage13–60.0118%28 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0420%26 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0827%25 Jul →
anubis13–2-0.0111%25 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0118%25 Jul →
inferno12–120.0015%25 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0735%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0320%24 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0919%24 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0226%23 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0222%19 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0125%19 Jul →
debris9–7-0.069%18 Jul →
debris9–40.069%18 Jul →
inferno13–50.0412%14 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0416%14 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0422%14 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0416%14 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.046%14 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0112%13 Jul →
nuke13–90.0519%12 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0112%12 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0610%12 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0122%12 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0325%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.