MaCrOs

MaCrOs — CS2 Stats

76561198050254572[U:1:89988844]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

999Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,677 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,677 → 1,677
+7Tracked matches · now 999
+3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,873 +1,850 30 May – 3 Jul · 6 days played
27,02328,975peak 28,97530 May3 Jul
28,975Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,677Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-05-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,677
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 74 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaCrOsFACEITLevel 9 · 1,677 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,677csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning46
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63–37Last 10063%Win rateWLWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time505ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 2 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · mirage, 15 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · mirage, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 1 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
13–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 10mirageWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1811–761%0.01
infernoA138–562%0.02
mirageC125–742%0.01
anubisS118–373%0.00
dust2A117–464%0.00
cacheS1010–0100%0.04
nukeA106–460%0.02
overpass—41–325%0.03
poseidon—32–167%0.00
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
eldorado—20–20%-0.17
train—11–0100%-0.00
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.00
debris—11–0100%0.14
shelter—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

320Matches
55%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
81.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5349%1.1015.6
Mirage4848%1.1515.8
Inferno4760%1.3417.0
Dust22955%1.3216.9
Nuke2952%1.3316.2
Anubis2857%1.2015.3
Vertigo1850%1.1115.2
Overpass1164%1.2115.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
505msReaction time
19.6%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
11.58HE damage / grenade
5.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.5549% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.1214%2 Oct →
vertigo8–13-0.0323%30 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0516%30 Sept →
anubis8–130.0619%27 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0115%22 Sept →
mirage11–130.0220%20 Sept →
inferno13–50.1219%20 Sept →
inferno13–90.0817%13 Sept →
ancient16–120.0216%9 Sept →
anubis13–110.0114%9 Sept →
nuke2–130.0219%7 Sept →
inferno3–130.0417%7 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0317%6 Sept →
ancient17–19-0.0418%30 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0616%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0216%30 Aug →
ancient13–70.0424%30 Aug →
mirage13–40.0812%27 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0215%23 Aug →
cache13–110.0213%23 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0222%23 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0210%17 Aug →
inferno6–130.0211%17 Aug →
ancient13–10.0416%16 Aug →
cache13–90.0420%16 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.017%16 Aug →
vertigo13–8-0.0121%16 Aug →
train13–2-0.0016%16 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0416%15 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.058%15 Aug →
dust28–130.0114%15 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0111%15 Aug →
eldorado5–9-0.159%15 Aug →
cache13–110.0516%15 Aug →
poseidon3–9-0.0619%11 Aug →
nuke13–100.004%11 Aug →
fachwerk13–10-0.0015%9 Aug →
mirage7–130.0111%9 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.045%9 Aug →
ancient9–130.0210%9 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0622%9 Aug →
inferno13–90.0318%5 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0018%5 Aug →
dust213–70.0825%5 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.097%4 Aug →
eldorado3–9-0.1922%4 Aug →
debris9–20.1410%4 Aug →
dust213–110.0220%3 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0410%3 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0222%3 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0310%2 Aug →
cache13–50.1425%2 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0118%1 Aug →
cache13–50.0215%1 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0533%15 Jul →
cache13–90.0223%15 Jul →
ancient13–80.0022%15 Jul →
shelter13–30.0812%14 Jul →
ancient13–40.0818%13 Jul →
inferno13–30.0223%13 Jul →
ancient13–50.0814%13 Jul →
inferno11–130.0317%9 Jul →
cache13–70.1022%9 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0413%8 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.014%8 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0321%5 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0320%5 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0631%5 Jul →
inferno13–10.0716%3 Jul →
ancient13–30.0622%3 Jul →
nuke3–130.0116%3 Jul →
cache13–110.0521%2 Jul →
poseidon9–70.0411%1 Jul →
ancient13–00.0222%1 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0123%1 Jul →
dust213–100.0318%23 Jun →
anubis13–40.0315%21 Jun →
anubis16–130.029%21 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0016%21 Jun →
nuke13–100.1018%20 Jun →
nuke13–6-0.0026%20 Jun →
overpass13–30.1314%11 Jun →
anubis13–50.0816%9 Jun →
dust28–130.0217%9 Jun →
nuke11–130.0420%9 Jun →
ancient11–130.0414%7 Jun →
nuke13–50.104%7 Jun →
overpass8–130.0325%7 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0222%5 Jun →
dust213–110.0322%5 Jun →
inferno6–130.0222%5 Jun →
inferno4–1-0.1314%5 Jun →
poseidon9–50.0426%5 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0017%3 Jun →
nuke13–70.0014%3 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0416%3 Jun →
ancient10–130.0111%30 May →
mirage13–10-0.0126%30 May →
dust213–11-0.0226%30 May →
overpass6–13-0.018%27 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.