UZUMAKI

UZUMAKI — CS2 Stats

76561198048414538[U:1:88148810]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,311Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,276Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#83456 of 222200 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+370Premier CS Rating · 18,906 → 19,276
+1Tracked matches · now 3,311
0.0ppWin rate · 46.7% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 5 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,276 +844 5 Jun17 Sept · 47 days played
16,06519,999peak 19,9995 Jun17 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
55Days played since 2026-06-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 723 below peak (19,999)
  • +1,135 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,318 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 724 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUZUMAKIFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,276 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning40
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −6.9pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility3.6
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 26 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 8–3 · cache, 20 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 6 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 6 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB41192246%-0.01
infernoC1881044%-0.00
dust2D1331023%0.00
anubisD93633%-0.00
ancientS65183%-0.02
cacheB63350%0.03
overpass41325%0.01
nuke32167%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
41%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
534msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
5.06HE damage / grenade
4.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4355 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1895% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0615%17 Sept
mirage7–130.0213%11 Sept
dust21–13-0.1122%11 Sept
inferno8–130.0115%10 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0214%9 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0225%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0116%6 Sept
mirage13–90.0111%5 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0911%4 Sept
cache3–13-0.0212%4 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0314%4 Sept
dust210–13-0.0320%4 Sept
mirage13–110.1119%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0517%24 Aug
dust213–90.0425%24 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0017%22 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0223%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0024%21 Aug
cache8–3-0.0250%20 Aug
inferno10–130.0515%17 Aug
cache13–40.1020%17 Aug
mirage10–130.0022%16 Aug
mirage6–130.0020%14 Aug
inferno13–40.0824%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0615%9 Aug
anubis6–13-0.089%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0013%4 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0430%4 Aug
anubis9–130.0216%1 Aug
dust26–130.0115%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0414%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0625%30 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0525%28 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0521%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0413%28 Jul
anubis13–60.0111%28 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0116%27 Jul
mirage13–11-0.067%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0221%24 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0317%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0722%23 Jul
inferno11–130.0116%20 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0610%20 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0530%19 Jul
anubis11–130.0315%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0313%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0710%17 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0233%17 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0312%16 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0118%16 Jul
inferno13–11-0.019%16 Jul
dust24–13-0.0138%15 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0618%13 Jul
inferno13–40.0317%13 Jul
mirage9–130.0327%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0210%7 Jul
overpass13–100.1021%7 Jul
dust210–130.0817%7 Jul
dust211–130.0019%6 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0216%6 Jul
cache13–00.0829%6 Jul
mirage13–10.0918%6 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0615%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0229%4 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0116%1 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0619%1 Jul
dust210–13-0.077%30 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0119%30 Jun
anubis16–140.0528%29 Jun
mirage13–100.0717%29 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0122%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0210%28 Jun
dust28–13-0.0120%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0016%28 Jun
mirage16–120.0015%27 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0224%27 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0118%26 Jun
dust213–80.1121%26 Jun
dust213–80.0726%24 Jun
inferno10–130.0219%23 Jun
ancient13–7-0.007%23 Jun
mirage13–100.0722%22 Jun
anubis13–40.070%21 Jun
dust215–15-0.0315%17 Jun
mirage10–13-0.086%16 Jun
mirage5–130.0022%16 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0121%16 Jun
cache11–130.0827%16 Jun
mirage13–110.0123%15 Jun
overpass6–130.0017%15 Jun
nuke10–130.0130%13 Jun
inferno6–13-0.064%13 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0015%10 Jun
mirage13–60.0420%9 Jun
inferno6–130.0324%7 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0223%7 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0029%7 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0318%6 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0520%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0421%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →