SILENCER — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198201700214[U:1:241434486]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,737Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,117Pink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2493 of 6529 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning53

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression7.8

Utility4.9

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning5.3

Utility4.9

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time602ms−34ms

first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms

Headshot accuracy27.9%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 29.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–2Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

12–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 14dust2Weakest map · 40% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	35	17–18	49%	-0.01
inferno	B	21	10–11	48%	-0.01
dust2	C	15	6–9	40%	0.02
anubis	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.00
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
ancient	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches

41%Win rate

0.69Avg K/D

67.6ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	19	26%	0.77	12.7
Anubis	8	62%	0.69	13.8
Ancient	7	43%	0.72	12.0
Vertigo	7	14%	0.82	13.6
Inferno	6	83%	0.88	11.3
Overpass	2	50%	1.12	14.0
Dust2	2	100%	0.56	11.0
Nuke	2	50%	0.72	12.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy

26.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.4%Spray accuracy

77.3%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

606msReaction time

37.8%T opening success

44.3%CT opening success

0.42Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

10.86HE damage / grenade

8.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4215 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.8342% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	2–13	0.07	43%	27 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	25%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	23%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	19%	13 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	40%	13 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	18%	13 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	29%	12 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	12%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	26%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	27%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	24%	9 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	50%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	33%	9 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	24%	9 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	26%	7 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.14	35%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.01	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	29%	6 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	27%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	37%	6 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	27%	5 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	62%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.06	37%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	32%	29 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	25%	29 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	14%	29 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	22%	29 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	31%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.04	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	35%	27 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.00	47%	27 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	42%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	33%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.07	42%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	33%	25 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	25%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.15	21%	24 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	23%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	25%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	29%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.00	31%	24 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	25%	23 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	36%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	29%	22 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	40%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	40%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	22%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	26%	19 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	30%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.10	55%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	34%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	6%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.00	46%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	19%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	27%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.06	30%	9 Jul →
overpass	8–13	0.01	38%	4 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.00	27%	4 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	4%	1 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.04	30%	1 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	35%	1 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.01	47%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.07	22%	29 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	20%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.06	26%	28 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	36%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.05	23%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.14	41%	28 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	19%	28 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	13%	28 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	17%	27 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.03	20%	27 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	30%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.00	27%	27 Jun →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	28%	27 Jun →
anubis	12–16	0.00	31%	27 Jun →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	29%	26 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.09	50%	26 Jun →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	29%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	43%	23 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.06	26%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.07	52%	10 Jun →
overpass	13–2	0.10	37%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.07	38%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.04	25%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.06	15%	10 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.04	34%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.04	40%	8 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	33%	8 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.02	32%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.05	38%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.05	21%	4 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	19%	3 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.00	33%	23 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	28%	22 May →