•Powjr• — CS2 Stats
76561198043822538[U:1:83556810]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 47.6% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 13.6% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.23 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 46.9% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: higher utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 27 | 11–16 | 41% | 0.03 | |
| A | 17 | 10–7 | 59% | 0.05 | |
| C | 14 | 6–8 | 43% | 0.03 | |
| S | 12 | 8–4 | 67% | 0.08 | |
| A | 10 | 6–4 | 60% | 0.02 | |
| B | 10 | 5–5 | 50% | 0.05 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.00 | |
| — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.01 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.06 | |
| sanctum | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.08 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 349 | 54% | 1.26 | 17.5 |
| Anubis | 283 | 51% | 1.18 | 16.5 |
| Ancient | 259 | 51% | 1.20 | 16.5 |
| Nuke | 188 | 53% | 1.17 | 16.4 |
| Dust2 | 102 | 51% | 1.14 | 16.9 |
| Inferno | 93 | 54% | 1.13 | 16.4 |
| Train | 58 | 59% | 1.33 | 16.5 |
| Vertigo | 51 | 57% | 1.30 | 18.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.2278% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8–13 | 0.05 | 27% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 17% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.17 | 25% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 30% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.04 | 39% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | 0.05 | 35% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.08 | 25% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.13 | 28% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 27% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 19% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.01 | 13% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 29% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.08 | 37% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 38% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 37% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 40% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 25% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 23% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.08 | 31% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.04 | 22% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.05 | 29% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.13 | 31% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.03 | 23% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.15 | 32% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 44% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.12 | 22% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 44% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 5–1 | 0.05 | 33% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 38% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.12 | 17% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.12 | 25% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 24% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.11 | 35% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 29% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.06 | 27% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.05 | 24% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 36% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 19% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.12 | 26% | 27 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 23% | 25 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 29% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.02 | 19% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.09 | 19% | 15 Jul → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.01 | 26% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.10 | 29% | 6 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 31% | 5 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 27% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.04 | 34% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 23% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.00 | 23% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 27% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.07 | 32% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.00 | 30% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 20% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 26% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.01 | 33% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 24 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 30% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 40% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 38% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 14% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.01 | 28% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.09 | 22% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 27% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.17 | 38% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.00 | 13% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 23% | 17 Jun → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.09 | 48% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.00 | 9% | 15 Jun → | ||
| 2–13 | 0.02 | 33% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 26% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 9–2 | -0.02 | 43% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.01 | 20% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.07 | 45% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.12 | 32% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.05 | 25% | 14 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 27% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.00 | 13% | 21 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 41% | 21 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 37% | 21 Apr → | ||
| 19–17 | 0.07 | 30% | 21 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 25% | 20 Apr → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.09 | 19% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 9–0 | 0.33 | 36% | 16 Apr → | ||
| sanctum | 8–8 | 0.08 | 27% | 16 Apr → | |
| 4–13 | 0.06 | 23% | 16 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.11 | 23% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 23% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.03 | 41% | 15 Apr → |
Match data via Leetify.