kst

kst — CS2 Stats

PROin meinem benzRetiredPortugalRiflerSettings & gear profile →

UA76561198043542136[U:1:83276408]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

966Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,976 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,976 → 2,976
+15Tracked matches · now 966
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 76 days played since 13 May 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,976 +0 29 Aug17 Sept · 7 observations
2,9762,976peak 2,97629 Aug17 Sept
15,756Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,976Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
76Days played since 2023-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,976
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 24 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkstFACEITLevel 10 · 2,976 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,976csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5050Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time546ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 4 Oct
43%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · ancient, 3 Nov
367msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · mirage, 17 Sept
16–2Biggest win · inferno, 13 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
34Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 76% over 17mirageWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC1971237%0.02
mirageD1751229%0.03
infernoS1713476%0.02
anubisB137654%0.02
dust2C94544%0.06
nukeC83538%0.01
overpassS86275%0.05
vertigoC73443%0.02
train220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,504Matches
62%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
91.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
25Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust222060%1.4218.3
Ancient14655%1.4020.6
Anubis12050%1.2818.6
Inferno9964%1.4519.0
Mirage8650%1.3216.9
Train2952%1.3718.9
Nuke2654%1.3118.8
Vertigo1741%1.3119.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.0%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
539msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
57.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
6.92HE damage / grenade
8.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4568% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.0119%18 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0425%17 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0215%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0223%7 Sept
ancient4–130.0824%5 Sept
anubis13–80.0520%21 Aug
ancient13–80.0419%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0719%12 Aug
inferno13–110.0515%9 Aug
ancient7–130.0124%31 Jul
dust211–130.0122%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0027%14 Jul
overpass9–13-0.017%12 May
overpass13–11-0.0129%9 May
inferno10–130.0315%6 May
mirage9–13-0.0325%3 May
inferno13–10-0.0218%2 May
ancient8–130.0519%2 May
dust27–130.0314%13 Apr
ancient13–40.0820%21 Mar
overpass13–40.1116%19 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0412%10 Mar
anubis22–180.0314%7 Mar
dust28–130.0114%1 Mar
nuke13–20.1120%22 Feb
train13–5-0.0220%12 Nov
overpass8–13-0.0521%12 Nov
mirage5–13-0.0221%11 Nov
overpass13–70.0729%10 Nov
train13–110.0514%6 Nov
dust216–120.1014%5 Nov
ancient16–130.0619%8 Sept
inferno13–80.0923%21 Feb
dust213–60.0623%10 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0914%12 Jan
ancient15–19-0.0416%7 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0027%20 Dec
inferno7–130.0218%12 Dec
dust213–30.0923%27 Nov
ancient6–130.0224%19 Nov
ancient13–110.0411%13 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0813%12 Nov
inferno13–11-0.0326%8 Nov
ancient11–130.0423%28 Oct
anubis14–160.0417%27 Oct
vertigo16–19-0.0317%27 Oct
dust21–13-0.0120%27 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0428%26 Oct
ancient13–110.0713%23 Oct
dust213–00.2420%4 Oct
mirage4–13-0.1017%5 Mar
overpass13–40.1220%28 Feb
mirage13–90.0917%26 Feb
anubis13–80.0326%26 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0221%19 Feb
vertigo13–160.0024%14 Feb
vertigo14–160.0521%12 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0227%7 Feb
mirage8–130.0413%31 Jan
anubis13–80.0413%29 Jan
anubis16–130.1120%24 Jan
vertigo13–60.0722%23 Jan
mirage13–90.0722%14 Jan
mirage6–130.0624%26 Dec
anubis13–60.0421%22 Nov
mirage13–20.0624%10 Nov
ancient4–13-0.0143%3 Nov
ancient2–13-0.0420%1 Nov
anubis13–10.0524%1 Nov
ancient9–13-0.0821%26 Sept
inferno16–120.0023%23 Sept
inferno16–40.0621%21 Sept
mirage10–160.0519%21 Sept
ancient16–120.0610%21 Sept
vertigo16–140.0123%20 Sept
mirage13–160.0123%19 Sept
overpass16–140.0215%19 Sept
mirage14–160.0520%17 Sept
nuke15–190.0217%11 Sept
inferno16–60.0624%11 Sept
overpass13–00.1227%11 Sept
mirage13–40.0735%11 Sept
nuke13–10.1718%10 Sept
ancient6–16-0.1033%7 Sept
anubis11–160.0218%7 Sept
inferno11–16-0.0119%2 Sept
inferno10–130.0811%2 Sept
mirage13–40.1117%2 Sept
ancient13–40.0417%1 Sept
mirage11–70.0723%1 Sept
mirage11–160.0727%13 Aug
nuke6–15-0.0215%7 Jun
inferno16–30.0322%7 Jun
inferno16–110.0518%7 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0113%7 Jun
ancient17–190.0218%5 Jun
vertigo7–160.0122%5 Jun
vertigo16–90.0417%13 May
inferno16–60.0224%13 May
inferno16–2-0.018%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →