br0dy

br0dy — CS2 Stats

76561198041872131[U:1:81606403]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,224Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,349Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 1,224
−4.9ppWin rate · 62.1% → 57.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 21 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,554 -1,686 21 Aug15 Jan · 4 days played
25,55427,240peak 27,24021 Aug15 Jan
27,240Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,839Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2025-08-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.7%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy18.4%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.661.071.090.43 short
Match win rate25.7%46.9%48.4%22.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbr0dyFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,839csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning69
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55396Last 10055%Win rateTLWWWTWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility6.4
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning6.9
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time635ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 23 Aug
31%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 7 Sept
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 20 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 3 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28161257%0.02
dust2B24121250%0.01
overpassS129375%0.01
nukeA117464%0.01
cacheC94544%0.01
ancientD61517%-0.01
trainS54180%0.03
inferno21150%0.02
anubis21150%0.04
italy1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

129,138Lifetime kills
0.66K/D
9,192Matches
25.7%Match win rate
52.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
18.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 9 players
10,804MVPs
6,349Hours (in match)
4,406Bombs planted
1,282Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4766,626
AWP6,988
Knife2,373
AUG1,711
P2501,691

Lifetime map wins

8,081dust2
4,071inferno
2,285train
2,234nuke
998vertigo
884cbble
131lake
67office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

774Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
85.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2955%1.0317.3
Inferno2045%0.8815.7
Ancient1338%0.9514.0
Nuke1242%1.0819.2
Dust21155%1.0818.3
Train875%1.5320.5
Vertigo743%0.9918.6
Overpass580%1.0417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
627msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
62.5%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
13.7%Flash assists
11.91HE damage / grenade
6.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4926% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0922% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–12-0.078%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.0710%7 Sept
cache13–100.048%25 May
cache13–30.0518%1 May
cache13–100.0916%1 May
cache12–12-0.0014%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.037%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0117%29 Apr
cache6–13-0.0315%29 Apr
cache6–130.0117%29 Apr
mirage16–140.0211%7 Apr
nuke10–130.0019%3 Apr
dust213–10.0818%3 Apr
overpass13–70.1111%15 Jan
nuke4–130.0115%10 Jan
dust210–130.0025%10 Jan
mirage7–130.035%10 Nov
dust25–10-0.0121%8 Nov
dust213–70.0518%26 Oct
mirage13–9-0.0512%13 Oct
nuke13–90.059%13 Oct
nuke7–13-0.038%6 Oct
overpass13–10-0.037%5 Oct
overpass13–110.0724%2 Oct
train7–00.0717%2 Oct
overpass11–13-0.0620%30 Sept
mirage7–13-0.068%30 Sept
dust213–2-0.0120%27 Sept
mirage13–50.1310%27 Sept
overpass13–50.046%27 Sept
train13–30.0421%27 Sept
mirage13–30.099%27 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0115%27 Sept
train13–6-0.006%27 Sept
dust213–80.0616%27 Sept
ancient12–120.017%27 Sept
inferno6–130.0411%26 Sept
dust213–50.0415%26 Sept
mirage6–130.0220%26 Sept
ancient13–100.0812%26 Sept
train13–40.076%26 Sept
nuke13–6-0.019%26 Sept
overpass13–40.0614%26 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0714%26 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0214%26 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0015%26 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0012%25 Sept
train10–13-0.019%25 Sept
nuke13–100.0212%25 Sept
mirage11–130.0819%25 Sept
overpass13–80.0220%25 Sept
mirage11–130.0914%25 Sept
dust27–13-0.0713%25 Sept
overpass12–120.0028%24 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0314%20 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0421%20 Sept
dust29–13-0.0430%20 Sept
nuke13–70.0823%17 Sept
overpass11–13-0.0216%14 Sept
mirage13–70.0517%14 Sept
dust26–13-0.0817%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0212%13 Sept
overpass13–7-0.0213%13 Sept
dust29–130.0931%7 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0128%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.018%7 Sept
dust213–70.0016%7 Sept
overpass13–60.0217%6 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0530%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0513%6 Sept
dust213–90.0624%6 Sept
dust213–5-0.0027%5 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0116%5 Sept
dust210–130.0320%5 Sept
mirage13–80.038%2 Sept
dust28–13-0.0412%1 Sept
mirage7–130.0018%1 Sept
mirage13–11-0.029%31 Aug
overpass13–10-0.0311%31 Aug
dust213–50.0217%31 Aug
italy8–130.0116%31 Aug
anubis12–120.0315%30 Aug
mirage13–20.0919%30 Aug
nuke19–15-0.009%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.027%30 Aug
dust213–80.0729%30 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0516%30 Aug
dust213–110.0416%30 Aug
dust28–130.0119%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0315%27 Aug
dust213–80.0615%27 Aug
mirage13–70.1311%23 Aug
dust28–110.0318%23 Aug
nuke8–130.0214%23 Aug
ancient11–13-0.036%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0711%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0517%21 Aug
mirage13–3-0.008%21 Aug
mirage13–7-0.056%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0414%21 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →