Dagmar

Dagmar — CS2 Stats

76561198041154639[U:1:80888911]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,071Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (56 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 1,071
0.0ppWin rate · 48.1% → 48.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,598 -1,981 29 Jan – 8 May · 30 days played
16,44520,980peak 20,98029 Jan8 May
21,109Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-01-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDagmarFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–51–6Last 10043%Win rateLLLWWTLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.3
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time581ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 5–13 · mirage, 28 Mar →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 3–6 · mirage, 3 Feb →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 27 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 21 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD257–1828%0.01
nukeS1813–572%0.00
dust2C177–1041%0.02
infernoC156–940%0.03
cacheC94–544%0.04
anubisD51–420%0.03
ancientD51–420%-0.02
overpass—43–175%0.04
cache_b—21–150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

362Matches
51%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
77.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage862%1.4216.8
Nuke4100%1.9019.8
Inferno450%1.1017.5
Vertigo40%1.0218.8
Ancient250%1.2515.0
Dust2250%0.9412.5
Anubis1100%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
588msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
14.08HE damage / grenade
6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.016%10 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.098%11 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0219%5 Sept →
cache13–110.0921%22 Jul →
cache10–40.0910%22 Jul →
mirage15–150.0115%22 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0431%22 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0110%21 Jul →
nuke13–80.0520%21 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0719%19 Jul →
mirage8–130.0811%13 Jul →
nuke13–110.0319%13 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0216%13 Jul →
nuke13–40.018%13 Jul →
dust24–130.0214%25 Jun →
cache13–70.1424%8 May →
cache12–12-0.0316%8 May →
nuke16–120.078%8 May →
cache13–40.1119%8 May →
cache4–130.0223%5 May →
cache3–13-0.0123%2 May →
mirage15–150.0218%19 Apr →
mirage13–80.0715%16 Apr →
mirage2–8-0.0136%16 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0313%12 Apr →
dust24–130.0230%2 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0025%2 Apr →
overpass13–90.0115%29 Mar →
dust213–60.0518%29 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0122%28 Mar →
inferno9–10.2637%28 Mar →
mirage5–130.2736%28 Mar →
dust21–13-0.0229%26 Mar →
inferno9–130.0218%26 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0132%21 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0426%21 Mar →
anubis3–130.0419%20 Mar →
inferno13–110.0424%15 Mar →
inferno9–130.0111%13 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0413%13 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.080%12 Mar →
mirage15–150.0216%12 Mar →
anubis9–130.0411%7 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0110%7 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0524%7 Mar →
nuke16–13-0.018%6 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0232%6 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0320%6 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.1016%6 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.029%6 Mar →
inferno13–30.1120%6 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.0123%6 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0218%1 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0719%27 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0222%27 Feb →
dust213–30.113%27 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0016%27 Feb →
nuke13–110.1013%27 Feb →
inferno3–130.0622%27 Feb →
cache_b13–11-0.0116%26 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0014%26 Feb →
ancient13–50.0041%24 Feb →
overpass13–70.0714%22 Feb →
mirage15–150.0221%22 Feb →
anubis13–110.017%22 Feb →
dust213–50.0631%22 Feb →
mirage10–130.0019%21 Feb →
nuke13–70.0519%21 Feb →
inferno13–1-0.0217%21 Feb →
mirage13–5-0.0119%20 Feb →
inferno5–130.0213%20 Feb →
nuke13–50.0114%20 Feb →
cache_b6–130.0315%20 Feb →
dust213–70.0716%15 Feb →
anubis9–130.0615%15 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0520%15 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0216%14 Feb →
ancient7–130.0118%14 Feb →
inferno13–90.0519%13 Feb →
inferno13–100.0212%13 Feb →
nuke13–80.0013%13 Feb →
dust212–160.0418%13 Feb →
mirage0–13-0.0328%13 Feb →
dust213–80.0417%13 Feb →
mirage10–130.0122%7 Feb →
mirage3–60.0344%3 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0119%1 Feb →
ancient8–130.0615%31 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.067%30 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0217%30 Jan →
mirage13–70.0410%30 Jan →
dust213–50.0527%29 Jan →
inferno9–130.0124%29 Jan →
nuke13–80.0122%29 Jan →
overpass13–90.1120%28 Jan →
mirage11–130.0210%28 Jan →
mirage13–100.0222%27 Jan →
nuke1–13-0.0419%27 Jan →
overpass7–13-0.0311%26 Jan →
mirage13–60.0022%26 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.