quArkstrudel

quArkstrudel — CS2 Stats

DE76561198038242736[U:1:77977008]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

511Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,576Top 50% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87288 of 247969 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,576 +1,529 27 Nov – 17 Sept · 33 days played
15,60319,576peak 19,57627 Nov17 Sept
19,576Peak Premier in tracked matches
50Days played since 2024-11-27

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,576
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 424 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquArkstrudelPREMIER19,576 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning58
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWLLLWWWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −106ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 448ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time549ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 8 Sept →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · nuke, 28 Jul →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 15 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 24 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 25mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2516–964%0.00
anubisA1810–856%-0.01
nukeD175–1229%-0.01
vertigoB157–847%-0.02
dust2D92–722%-0.02
mirageD61–517%0.01
cache—31–233%-0.04
inferno—32–167%-0.00
train—31–233%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
545msReaction time
46.7%T opening success
38.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
12.8%Flash assists
9.27HE damage / grenade
3.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2439 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.1595% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0419%17 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0212%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0416%15 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0412%15 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0330%15 Sept →
ancient13–60.0214%15 Sept →
nuke16–130.0214%14 Sept →
anubis15–150.0417%14 Sept →
anubis13–110.0410%14 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0612%11 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0116%9 Sept →
dust213–50.0517%9 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0514%4 Sept →
inferno12–80.0312%3 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0522%3 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0411%2 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0119%2 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0710%2 Aug →
nuke10–130.0110%30 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0124%30 Jul →
nuke13–60.0131%28 Jul →
ancient13–40.0528%28 Jul →
anubis13–90.0423%11 May →
ancient11–13-0.0325%11 May →
overpass16–140.0220%12 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0814%12 Oct →
ancient3–130.0130%11 Sept →
dust213–30.0924%8 Sept →
train13–10-0.0114%8 Sept →
train7–130.0410%4 Aug →
ancient13–110.0121%4 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0415%18 May →
train4–13-0.095%1 Feb →
ancient11–130.028%30 Jan →
ancient13–110.053%30 Jan →
mirage11–130.028%29 Jan →
dust29–13-0.048%29 Jan →
nuke13–110.0416%29 Jan →
dust211–13-0.076%29 Jan →
anubis13–7-0.0419%29 Jan →
anubis13–6-0.037%24 Jan →
vertigo13–10.046%24 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.025%23 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.007%23 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0325%19 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0215%19 Jan →
dust215–15-0.0418%15 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0720%13 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0710%12 Jan →
vertigo13–110.0221%12 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0220%8 Jan →
anubis6–13-0.0815%7 Jan →
anubis13–50.0210%7 Jan →
ancient13–90.019%6 Jan →
ancient13–20.0317%6 Jan →
nuke5–13-0.0415%4 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0019%4 Jan →
vertigo13–4-0.0419%4 Jan →
anubis14–16-0.0312%2 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0616%2 Jan →
nuke13–60.019%1 Jan →
mirage10–13-0.0316%1 Jan →
ancient13–60.0314%30 Dec →
ancient13–90.0315%30 Dec →
vertigo10–13-0.0317%29 Dec →
ancient13–110.028%29 Dec →
nuke12–160.0213%18 Dec →
nuke9–13-0.0114%18 Dec →
vertigo13–8-0.0116%17 Dec →
nuke14–160.017%17 Dec →
anubis4–13-0.0519%16 Dec →
ancient16–140.0012%16 Dec →
vertigo13–80.0318%16 Dec →
inferno16–14-0.0013%15 Dec →
mirage11–30.088%15 Dec →
ancient13–100.0012%15 Dec →
ancient13–9-0.0319%13 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.005%13 Dec →
mirage6–13-0.0115%13 Dec →
inferno4–13-0.0310%12 Dec →
anubis13–60.0211%12 Dec →
nuke7–130.0213%11 Dec →
vertigo3–13-0.0823%10 Dec →
vertigo5–130.0026%9 Dec →
vertigo4–13-0.0225%9 Dec →
nuke16–140.0117%9 Dec →
vertigo13–8-0.0423%5 Dec →
vertigo8–13-0.0220%5 Dec →
nuke15–150.0513%4 Dec →
vertigo6–13-0.0610%4 Dec →
vertigo13–11-0.0313%4 Dec →
vertigo4–13-0.0423%2 Dec →
ancient13–40.0312%2 Dec →
ancient13–11-0.0114%2 Dec →
ancient13–50.038%1 Dec →
ancient3–13-0.0418%29 Nov →
anubis13–10.067%29 Nov →
anubis13–10.0425%29 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0713%28 Nov →
vertigo14–160.0412%27 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.