akerholten

akerholten — CS2 Stats

76561198037725065[U:1:77459337]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

866Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,105 +1,323 25 Jan – 24 Mar · 30 days played
12,78215,115peak 15,11525 Jan24 Mar
15,115Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-01-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGakerholtenFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning49
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +5.9pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility7.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch0.0

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.9
Utility7.7
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time586ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 15 Feb →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · anubis, 1 Feb →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 25 Jan →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 15 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7overpassWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2211–1150%0.01
ancientB209–1145%0.01
mirageC177–1041%0.01
anubisA148–657%0.00
nukeB105–550%0.03
overpassC83–538%0.01
dust2S75–271%0.04
cache—11–0100%0.10
office—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

741Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
72.9ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1258%1.2020.2
Mirage520%0.8212.4
Overpass580%1.1614.8
Anubis540%1.1014.6
Ancient30%1.1222.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
583msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
11.25HE damage / grenade
18.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2008% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0213%7 Jun →
cache13–30.1030%2 May →
inferno8–13-0.0113%24 Mar →
dust213–20.1531%22 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0118%22 Mar →
office13–20.0522%21 Mar →
inferno13–60.1464%16 Mar →
mirage10–130.0222%16 Mar →
anubis16–13-0.0226%14 Mar →
inferno13–110.0141%14 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0120%14 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0324%13 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0124%13 Mar →
mirage8–130.0227%12 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0117%12 Mar →
dust213–80.0610%2 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0616%2 Mar →
mirage10–130.0130%2 Mar →
nuke10–130.0321%2 Mar →
dust213–40.0933%2 Mar →
nuke2–130.0414%1 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0413%1 Mar →
anubis13–70.056%28 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0324%28 Feb →
anubis13–5-0.0038%28 Feb →
ancient4–130.0430%28 Feb →
overpass14–160.0213%28 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0233%28 Feb →
anubis13–100.049%27 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0310%26 Feb →
ancient13–110.0316%26 Feb →
inferno13–40.048%25 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0516%23 Feb →
dust213–50.0321%23 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0120%23 Feb →
overpass13–60.0825%22 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0023%21 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0321%21 Feb →
ancient1–13-0.0421%16 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0217%16 Feb →
mirage1–13-0.0912%16 Feb →
inferno13–90.0213%15 Feb →
nuke13–160.0820%15 Feb →
inferno13–00.1615%15 Feb →
ancient1–13-0.076%15 Feb →
ancient13–70.0439%15 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.025%14 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0533%14 Feb →
nuke13–40.0725%14 Feb →
nuke11–130.0535%12 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0424%12 Feb →
ancient13–4-0.0322%12 Feb →
ancient8–130.0132%11 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0119%11 Feb →
mirage13–90.0323%9 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0522%9 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.038%8 Feb →
ancient10–130.0829%8 Feb →
mirage13–110.0236%8 Feb →
ancient12–120.0313%7 Feb →
mirage13–30.1227%7 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.0224%7 Feb →
overpass13–90.0232%6 Feb →
anubis13–70.0534%6 Feb →
ancient14–160.0021%6 Feb →
ancient11–130.0327%5 Feb →
inferno13–50.0133%5 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0027%4 Feb →
ancient13–90.0212%2 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0020%1 Feb →
ancient13–70.0722%1 Feb →
anubis13–3-0.02100%1 Feb →
overpass13–80.0040%1 Feb →
inferno9–130.0119%1 Feb →
mirage13–20.0228%31 Jan →
ancient13–50.018%31 Jan →
mirage4–13-0.0158%30 Jan →
anubis7–13-0.039%30 Jan →
nuke13–100.0020%30 Jan →
mirage13–40.0735%30 Jan →
overpass9–130.0519%29 Jan →
inferno13–7-0.0126%29 Jan →
anubis6–130.0435%25 Jan →
dust213–6-0.0224%25 Jan →
inferno13–80.0334%25 Jan →
nuke9–1-0.047%25 Jan →
mirage13–50.0831%25 Jan →
anubis11–13-0.0223%25 Jan →
ancient13–5-0.0126%25 Jan →
inferno13–1-0.0213%25 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.0219%25 Jan →
ancient13–80.0411%25 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0317%25 Jan →
inferno13–70.0715%25 Jan →
nuke13–110.0523%24 Jan →
ancient11–130.0424%24 Jan →
nuke13–80.0522%23 Jan →
mirage11–130.0426%23 Jan →
anubis13–40.0925%22 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0610%22 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.