!GG!

!GG! — CS2 Stats

FI76561198036106275[U:1:75840547]Steam profile ↗VAC banned · 1 game ban

921Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,561 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,132 +969 19 Jul – 24 Sept · 32 days played
14,10717,511peak 17,51119 Jul24 Sept
17,753Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,561Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,561
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 190 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG!GG!FACEITLevel 8 · 1,561 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,561csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning50
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −6.0pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time614ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 5 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 6 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · dust2, 20 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2411–1346%0.01
mirageB209–1145%0.01
cacheC167–944%0.02
infernoA138–562%0.02
nukeA138–562%0.06
ancientA95–456%0.02
anubisD50–50%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

460Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
80.0ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4264%1.2717.4
Dust23453%1.1316.9
Nuke2532%1.0415.8
Mirage1553%0.9814.8
Ancient1136%0.8415.2
Overpass978%1.3616.6
Train862%1.1215.1
Anubis743%0.9115.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
617msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
62.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.58HE damage / grenade
6.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.946% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0115%29 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0117%18 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0122%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0611%15 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.098%10 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0619%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.088%10 Sept →
mirage3–130.0610%10 Sept →
inferno13–60.0414%9 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.019%9 Sept →
nuke13–50.0825%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0621%9 Sept →
cache13–40.0820%9 Sept →
cache13–80.0916%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0225%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0628%9 Sept →
anubis7–130.0417%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0618%8 Sept →
nuke13–50.0223%8 Sept →
dust213–6-0.052%6 Sept →
cache13–20.0210%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.027%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.0513%6 Sept →
inferno13–20.1117%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0139%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0120%6 Sept →
cache10–13-0.017%5 Sept →
ancient13–100.0320%5 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0216%5 Sept →
dust213–30.1713%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.009%5 Sept →
mirage11–130.0512%5 Sept →
cache10–10.056%31 Aug →
nuke9–130.0511%31 Aug →
dust213–50.0811%31 Aug →
mirage13–100.0317%22 Aug →
dust215–150.0411%22 Aug →
nuke7–130.0217%22 Aug →
dust25–130.0120%22 Aug →
cache15–150.0213%20 Aug →
inferno13–110.048%20 Aug →
dust213–160.0121%20 Aug →
cache13–40.1123%19 Aug →
nuke13–110.1018%19 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0313%19 Aug →
mirage7–130.0314%19 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0314%19 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0333%19 Aug →
nuke13–110.0620%18 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0619%18 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0213%18 Aug →
ancient13–70.0018%18 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0116%18 Aug →
nuke2–10-0.0410%18 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.029%17 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.006%17 Aug →
cache2–130.0117%17 Aug →
nuke13–80.1219%17 Aug →
inferno13–70.158%16 Aug →
dust27–130.1013%16 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.029%16 Aug →
mirage13–100.0410%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0838%16 Aug →
dust213–20.0518%13 Aug →
mirage13–110.0113%13 Aug →
cache10–130.009%11 Aug →
ancient13–110.1115%11 Aug →
nuke13–00.1116%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0613%5 Aug →
cache10–130.0318%5 Aug →
dust213–80.0529%3 Aug →
nuke7–130.0526%3 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.038%2 Aug →
dust213–50.0227%2 Aug →
cache13–100.0111%31 Jul →
nuke13–80.0514%30 Jul →
inferno11–130.0110%29 Jul →
mirage13–70.0711%29 Jul →
dust22–13-0.056%29 Jul →
nuke13–100.1313%29 Jul →
cache12–160.017%28 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0515%28 Jul →
mirage7–130.0114%28 Jul →
inferno16–130.0012%27 Jul →
ancient10–130.027%26 Jul →
inferno0–13-0.0413%26 Jul →
cache13–110.0513%25 Jul →
ancient13–90.0820%24 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.047%24 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0313%23 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0228%22 Jul →
mirage13–100.0210%22 Jul →
ancient4–130.0213%22 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0410%22 Jul →
mirage13–110.0014%21 Jul →
dust28–130.0322%20 Jul →
dust213–40.0217%20 Jul →
dust211–130.044%20 Jul →
cache12–160.0516%20 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0013%19 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.