eki

eki — CS2 Stats

SK76561198036009706[U:1:75743978]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

906Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,127Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69117 of 261617 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,360 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,127 +612 9 Sept – 1 Nov · 15 days played
20,51522,275peak 22,2759 Sept1 Nov
22,779Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,360Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-09-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,360
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 171 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,148 below peak (22,275)
  • -840 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,873 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGekiFACEITLevel 8 · 1,360 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,127 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,360csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning59
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateLLLWLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 76% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 76% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time560ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 25 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–5 · dust2, 3 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 72% over 18ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2513–1252%-0.01
mirageA1811–761%0.01
cacheS1813–572%-0.01
anubisB157–847%0.01
infernoB137–654%0.01
ancientC73–443%-0.01
nuke—42–250%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

409Matches
53%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
83.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5654%1.2516.8
Dust24856%1.2218.2
Inferno2763%1.2218.3
Ancient2627%1.1616.3
Anubis2357%1.1416.7
Nuke1164%1.1417.6
Cache1050%1.1014.6
Overpass6100%1.2715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
540msReaction time
76.1%T opening success
42.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.21HE damage / grenade
6.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0523%1 Nov →
ancient0–13-0.107%1 Nov →
anubis10–130.0214%1 Nov →
dust216–13-0.007%31 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0225%31 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0518%31 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0217%31 Oct →
cache13–80.0122%31 Oct →
inferno13–80.0015%30 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0722%30 Oct →
mirage13–80.0215%28 Oct →
cache13–9-0.049%28 Oct →
anubis9–130.0022%28 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0119%26 Oct →
inferno13–80.0120%26 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0416%26 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0112%25 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0223%25 Oct →
mirage13–60.0719%25 Oct →
anubis13–50.1116%25 Oct →
dust219–160.0029%25 Oct →
mirage13–160.019%24 Oct →
dust213–90.0123%24 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0717%24 Oct →
nuke5–130.0428%24 Oct →
anubis2–130.0227%24 Oct →
ancient10–130.0123%24 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0314%24 Oct →
dust211–13-0.013%24 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0917%24 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0817%23 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0115%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0423%23 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0225%23 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0131%23 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.037%23 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0416%23 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.009%23 Oct →
inferno15–150.0314%23 Oct →
anubis13–80.0123%21 Oct →
cache13–90.0718%19 Oct →
anubis8–130.0023%19 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0211%18 Oct →
cache13–5-0.019%18 Oct →
inferno16–130.0516%18 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.054%18 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0217%18 Oct →
mirage12–20.0516%18 Oct →
dust20–9-0.0829%18 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0412%18 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0620%11 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0022%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.027%11 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0121%11 Oct →
inferno8–130.0420%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0621%6 Oct →
inferno11–130.0016%6 Oct →
cache19–22-0.0216%6 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0716%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0126%3 Oct →
dust29–13-0.027%3 Oct →
mirage13–60.0416%3 Oct →
inferno9–60.0818%3 Oct →
dust22–50.0550%3 Oct →
inferno13–30.0218%2 Oct →
mirage13–50.0525%2 Oct →
dust211–130.0127%28 Sept →
mirage19–150.0519%28 Sept →
mirage13–90.0026%27 Sept →
dust216–140.0117%27 Sept →
anubis13–60.0721%27 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0315%27 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0017%27 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0128%27 Sept →
cache13–40.0516%27 Sept →
ancient13–100.0117%27 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0838%27 Sept →
cache13–00.0911%27 Sept →
dust213–11-0.028%26 Sept →
dust213–100.079%26 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0330%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0836%26 Sept →
nuke13–80.0328%26 Sept →
cache10–13-0.096%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0520%24 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0417%24 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0215%24 Sept →
cache13–80.0325%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0517%20 Sept →
mirage4–30.0431%20 Sept →
anubis13–20.0424%20 Sept →
dust28–130.0411%20 Sept →
cache13–90.0411%20 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0017%20 Sept →
cache13–40.0312%20 Sept →
dust213–40.0517%20 Sept →
inferno12–120.0523%20 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0513%20 Sept →
ancient13–30.0819%20 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0117%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.