Kos — CS2 Stats

76561198035355275[U:1:75089547]✓ No bans

1,967Tracked matches79%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#18143 of 20463 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,283 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,283Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,283
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 217 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning48

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT78–19–3Last 10078%Win rateWWLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7

Aggression5.7

Utility5.8

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning4.8

Utility5.8

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time635ms+87ms

first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms

Headshot accuracy27.2%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 30.3% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 4–0

13–0Biggest win — train

18Longest win streak

W2Current streak

1–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 68% over 40

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	40	27–13	68%	0.03
mirage	S	24	20–4	83%	0.02
cache	S	10	8–2	80%	0.04
nuke	S	9	8–1	89%	0.02
vertigo	S	6	6–0	100%	0.05
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
inferno	—	3	3–0	100%	0.05
train	—	2	2–0	100%	0.06
ancient	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (68% over 40). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

726Matches

67%Win rate

1.41Avg K/D

77.3ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

20Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	85	59%	1.25	16.2
Dust2	63	65%	1.18	16.1
Ancient	34	68%	1.04	15.2
Anubis	19	63%	0.98	15.6
Cache	6	67%	1.37	19.3
Overpass	4	25%	0.88	13.5
Nuke	3	67%	1.16	16.7
Inferno	3	67%	0.71	8.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

87.1%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

627msReaction time

16.6%T opening success

51.3%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

12.1%Flash assists

4.10HE damage / grenade

12.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 16.6047% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–10	-0.00	23%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.00	28%	21 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.06	37%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	20%	12 Aug →
train	13–0	-0.00	33%	12 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.08	32%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	30%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	23%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.10	43%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	38%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	29%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	41%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.01	14%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	25%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	36%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	13%	1 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.07	42%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–0	-0.01	40%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	42%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–1	-0.02	30%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.02	48%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.05	38%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	22%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–8	-0.05	11%	28 Jul →
dust2	1–6	-0.06	0%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.01	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	23%	24 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.02	24%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.00	11%	24 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.03	30%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.06	17%	23 Jul →
ancient	10–2	0.04	16%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.03	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.01	33%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.08	59%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.06	40%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.03	22%	23 Jul →
cache	4–0	-0.00	0%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	27%	23 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.00	32%	23 Jul →
dust2	4–0	0.17	88%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	33%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	29%	22 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.05	24%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–12	-0.06	29%	22 Jul →
dust2	4–0	0.08	33%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	18%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	19%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.11	38%	22 Jul →
vertigo	13–1	0.13	71%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	25%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	36%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–1	0.07	32%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.08	20%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.07	26%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	21%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	24%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	29%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.00	33%	17 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	21%	17 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	-0.03	28%	17 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.03	33%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.07	38%	16 Jul →
cache	5–0	-0.04	25%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	29%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	24%	15 Jul →
vertigo	13–1	0.08	26%	15 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.15	32%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	64%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	33%	11 Jul →
train	13–2	0.11	38%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–2	-0.04	44%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	38%	11 Jul →
dust2	8–3	-0.02	46%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	32%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	38%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	30%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	33%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	27%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.00	13%	8 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	38%	7 Jul →
mirage	3–9	0.01	54%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	23%	6 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	32%	6 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.02	32%	5 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.08	33%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.06	50%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	23%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.11	8%	4 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	21%	4 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.00	27%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.07	21%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	30%	2 Jul →
nuke	0–13	-0.06	0%	1 Jul →
dust2	0–2	0.00	0%	1 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.02	13%	1 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.12	50%	30 Jun →