Talz

Talz — CS2 Stats

JP76561198035284993[U:1:75019265]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

594Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#51290 of 252525 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,645 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,263Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,645Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-07-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,645
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTalzFACEITLevel 7 · 1,645 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,645csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning60
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility7.0
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.0
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time536ms−100ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.50Best match rating · 2–9 · inferno, 11 Jul →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · inferno, 11 Jul →
398msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 30 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 43% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3013–1743%0.06
dust2A2414–1058%0.07
mirageB2312–1152%0.03
ancientA159–660%0.02
nuke—40–40%0.10
cache—32–167%0.05
anubis—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

737Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
76.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5349%1.1916.3
Dust25141%1.0914.3
Mirage5052%1.0515.0
Ancient3658%1.3016.8
Overpass875%1.3212.5
Nuke862%1.2616.6
Anubis617%1.0215.2
Cache475%1.4219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.4%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
537msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
10.28HE damage / grenade
16.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.1175% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0413%14 Oct →
ancient13–100.0415%13 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0217%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0124%12 Oct →
inferno19–22-0.0115%12 Oct →
inferno13–20.0519%11 Oct →
dust213–70.1914%11 Oct →
mirage12–160.0416%8 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0014%7 Oct →
inferno10–130.0923%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0122%29 Sept →
dust213–70.0218%26 Sept →
ancient10–130.079%26 Sept →
cache13–90.038%26 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0610%26 Sept →
mirage13–100.0514%24 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.089%24 Sept →
mirage7–130.0419%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0522%30 Aug →
inferno13–80.0218%30 Aug →
ancient11–130.0018%30 Aug →
dust29–130.0513%30 Aug →
inferno11–130.0517%26 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0514%26 Aug →
dust211–13-0.028%26 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0115%25 Aug →
mirage12–160.0015%25 Aug →
inferno9–130.0214%19 Aug →
cache13–90.0913%19 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0422%19 Aug →
ancient13–90.0419%18 Aug →
dust213–10.2126%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0326%17 Aug →
inferno13–100.1029%16 Aug →
mirage13–110.1015%15 Aug →
nuke2–130.0619%15 Aug →
anubis14–160.018%12 Aug →
ancient8–130.0317%12 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.038%12 Aug →
mirage13–60.0218%12 Aug →
ancient13–110.0113%11 Aug →
ancient13–100.016%11 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0020%8 Aug →
dust212–120.0121%8 Aug →
dust213–20.0716%7 Aug →
inferno7–130.1223%7 Aug →
nuke11–130.1128%7 Aug →
ancient13–50.0718%6 Aug →
dust29–130.0118%6 Aug →
mirage13–110.0215%5 Aug →
mirage13–100.0432%1 Aug →
inferno13–110.1222%1 Aug →
dust213–40.1527%1 Aug →
inferno13–110.0519%31 Jul →
nuke2–90.1425%31 Jul →
inferno8–130.1114%31 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0333%31 Jul →
dust211–60.1215%31 Jul →
inferno5–120.0332%30 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.072%29 Jul →
ancient19–170.0016%27 Jul →
inferno7–130.0320%27 Jul →
mirage13–110.0215%26 Jul →
mirage13–80.0314%24 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0222%24 Jul →
inferno13–40.0911%24 Jul →
dust213–100.0111%24 Jul →
mirage13–100.1026%22 Jul →
inferno11–130.0615%22 Jul →
inferno13–110.0815%20 Jul →
mirage13–40.0018%19 Jul →
dust213–40.1224%19 Jul →
mirage3–130.0519%18 Jul →
inferno11–130.0715%18 Jul →
dust213–90.0514%18 Jul →
mirage6–130.044%16 Jul →
ancient13–60.0225%16 Jul →
ancient13–30.0614%16 Jul →
dust211–130.1413%15 Jul →
mirage9–130.1141%15 Jul →
dust23–130.0317%13 Jul →
inferno10–130.0716%12 Jul →
mirage13–70.0318%12 Jul →
dust213–100.0625%12 Jul →
cache5–130.029%12 Jul →
mirage13–30.0612%12 Jul →
inferno13–100.1118%12 Jul →
inferno2–90.5060%11 Jul →
mirage13–50.0428%10 Jul →
dust213–90.1313%10 Jul →
dust213–40.2112%8 Jul →
inferno11–130.188%8 Jul →
nuke10–130.0816%8 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0010%6 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0017%6 Jul →
inferno13–110.1414%5 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0620%5 Jul →
inferno11–130.0810%3 Jul →
mirage8–130.0415%3 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.038%2 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.