EZ4BENCE

EZ4BENCE — CS2 Stats

76561198034409784[U:1:74144056]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

666Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,422Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,631Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#66338 of 227094 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Jun 2026 (109 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 8 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,631 +107 14 May1 Jun · 2 days played
20,52420,631peak 20,63114 May1 Jun
20,631Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-05-08

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,631
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,369 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate67.9%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy14.4%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.021.04above
Match win rate43.7%44.7%45.2%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEZ4BENCEFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,631 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning53
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility5.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time600ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy25.5%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 27 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · anubis, 13 Jul
453msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 4 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 27 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 65% over 20ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2181338%-0.02
anubisS2013765%-0.02
infernoA1810856%-0.03
dust2A116555%-0.03
nukeB105550%-0.01
ancientD103730%-0.01
overpassA74357%-0.01
cache31233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,226Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,124Matches
43.7%Match win rate
67.9%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
4,645MVPs
1,223Hours (in match)
1,777Bombs planted
1,101Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,208inferno
2,371dust2
2,058nuke
1,976vertigo
773train
14cbble
4ar_baggage
4lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

561Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
67.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3946%0.8413.3
Mirage3850%0.8713.6
Inferno3053%0.7613.5
Ancient2752%0.8814.7
Nuke1741%0.8715.5
Dust21650%0.8212.3
Overpass1573%0.9912.6
Vertigo933%0.709.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
599msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
12.52HE damage / grenade
6.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0355% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0424%16 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0530%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0225%10 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0633%7 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0224%7 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0937%4 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0925%4 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0122%4 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0325%4 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0214%30 Aug
ancient11–130.0416%27 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0327%27 Aug
inferno13–60.0135%27 Aug
anubis13–10.1223%27 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0328%25 Aug
cache13–4-0.0017%24 Aug
ancient13–40.1130%24 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0325%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0220%21 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0248%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0117%21 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0135%13 Aug
inferno13–90.0041%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0218%7 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0814%7 Aug
nuke17–19-0.0320%27 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0721%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0622%17 Jul
nuke11–130.0032%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0423%17 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0526%17 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0128%17 Jul
dust213–8-0.0819%15 Jul
mirage14–160.0130%15 Jul
dust213–40.0322%15 Jul
anubis13–30.0950%13 Jul
dust29–130.0224%13 Jul
cache11–130.0319%8 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0622%8 Jul
inferno13–70.0046%7 Jul
dust213–6-0.0238%7 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0336%7 Jul
mirage13–100.0528%7 Jul
overpass12–16-0.0429%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1337%5 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0120%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0516%5 Jul
mirage13–50.0428%5 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0327%5 Jul
anubis13–20.0531%5 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0112%3 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0126%3 Jul
inferno13–60.0227%3 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0027%29 Jun
cache13–160.0437%29 Jun
dust213–90.0021%29 Jun
anubis16–130.0117%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0424%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0523%28 Jun
anubis5–13-0.1037%26 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0819%26 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0421%22 Jun
mirage12–160.0327%22 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0224%21 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0418%21 Jun
overpass13–20.1137%21 Jun
inferno22–20-0.0235%20 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0431%18 Jun
anubis13–50.0327%18 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0712%18 Jun
mirage13–50.0137%15 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0444%15 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0125%15 Jun
dust28–13-0.0737%15 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0323%10 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0516%10 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0334%10 Jun
mirage9–130.0131%10 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0226%9 Jun
nuke13–40.0732%9 Jun
inferno19–16-0.0231%8 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0835%8 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0327%7 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0419%4 Jun
inferno19–22-0.0225%4 Jun
dust216–14-0.0227%2 Jun
nuke13–100.0230%1 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0338%1 Jun
overpass13–90.0225%1 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0320%31 May
mirage14–16-0.0725%18 May
inferno13–8-0.0231%18 May
anubis13–7-0.0822%18 May
inferno13–11-0.0031%14 May
mirage10–13-0.0729%11 May
dust213–11-0.0333%11 May
dust25–13-0.0848%8 May
ancient13–5-0.0432%8 May
mirage7–13-0.0232%8 May
anubis13–11-0.0429%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →