Sebz

Sebz — CS2 Stats

76561198032818211[U:1:72552483]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

772Tracked matches33%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,504 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,504 → 1,504
+38Tracked matches · now 772
−23.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 33.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,504 +0 30 Aug – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,5041,504peak 1,50430 Aug20 Sept
1,504Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,504
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 27 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSebzFACEITLevel 8 · 1,504 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,504csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–44Last 10056%Win rateWLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +87ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time535ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 8 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 2 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · anubis, 3 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 16infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS3120–1165%-0.01
nukeA169–756%-0.02
anubisS1612–475%-0.01
mirageB157–847%-0.01
infernoD113–827%-0.03
cacheB63–350%-0.04
dust2—41–325%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

304Matches
54%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
65.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8366%0.8813.1
Inferno5147%0.8112.0
Mirage4844%0.8112.8
Anubis3557%0.8812.9
Nuke3444%0.8013.3
Train1765%0.8714.3
Dust2933%0.9015.2
Cache771%0.9214.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.8%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
530msReaction time
55.6%T opening success
31.7%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.50HE damage / grenade
8.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4533 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.6694% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.0219%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0418%15 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0216%15 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0328%15 Oct →
mirage23–25-0.0315%12 Oct →
anubis19–16-0.039%11 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0220%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0514%10 Oct →
mirage13–70.0213%10 Oct →
ancient13–90.0129%9 Oct →
mirage10–130.0010%9 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.109%9 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.0423%9 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0214%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0621%9 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0228%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0221%3 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0723%3 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0317%3 Oct →
cache8–13-0.079%3 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0127%3 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.0937%3 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0214%2 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0120%2 Oct →
mirage13–40.0829%2 Oct →
ancient9–130.0113%2 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0818%2 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0423%2 Oct →
anubis13–70.019%27 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0413%27 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0318%27 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0119%26 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0611%26 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0119%26 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0217%25 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0319%25 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0132%23 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0324%23 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0116%20 Sept →
cache13–10-0.075%19 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0527%19 Sept →
mirage10–130.0221%15 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.0020%15 Sept →
nuke11–130.0317%15 Sept →
cache13–110.0016%15 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0513%15 Sept →
ancient13–110.0213%12 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0523%12 Sept →
nuke6–130.0223%12 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0514%11 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0825%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0316%7 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0321%7 Sept →
nuke13–100.0032%5 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0321%3 Sept →
cache2–130.0021%3 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0124%28 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0812%28 Aug →
cache8–13-0.1018%28 Aug →
ancient13–90.0133%28 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0832%23 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0515%23 Aug →
cache13–30.0033%22 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0424%22 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0127%22 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0133%20 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0214%19 Aug →
inferno16–140.0215%18 Aug →
nuke13–80.0023%17 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0123%16 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0132%16 Aug →
nuke13–110.0634%14 Aug →
anubis19–16-0.0113%13 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0226%9 Aug →
anubis9–130.0222%9 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0416%8 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0319%8 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0126%8 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0723%8 Aug →
ancient13–50.1321%8 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0523%8 Aug →
anubis13–110.0724%8 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0526%4 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0215%4 Aug →
mirage13–50.0132%3 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0022%3 Aug →
ancient11–130.0023%3 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0321%3 Aug →
mirage13–50.0038%2 Aug →
ancient13–90.0434%2 Aug →
ancient13–90.0421%2 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0231%2 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0421%2 Aug →
anubis13–100.0225%2 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0222%2 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0129%1 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0429%1 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0318%1 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0916%31 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0228%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.