Kuzaq

Kuzaq — CS2 Stats

FI76561198032145613[U:1:71879885]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,353Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,509Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating10,560Blue band · top ~51.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,104 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,353 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 29 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,560 -411 29 Jul20 Sept · 21 days played
8,98311,479peak 11,47929 Jul20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,104 +0 19 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
1,1041,104peak 1,10419 Sept20 Sept
11,988Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,104Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,104
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 919 below peak (11,479)
  • +1,175 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,440 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.9%42.7%43.8%3.9% short
Shot accuracy13.7%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.850.991.020.17 short
Match win rate44.4%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKuzaqFACEITLevel 4 · 1,104 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,560 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,104csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35
Positioning44
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateLWLLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 674ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim3.5
Utility5.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5
Positioning4.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics2.9
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time639ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 5 Sept
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 18 Sept
484msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · vertigo, 21 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C37162143%0.00
ancientA1912763%0.02
mirageS1611569%0.01
nukeA95456%-0.00
infernoD92722%0.01
anubisB63350%-0.00
cache32167%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

147,952Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
9,323Matches
44.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
39.9%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
16,786MVPs
4,100Hours (in match)
11,845Bombs planted
2,186Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,171
AWP20,924
P904,954
MP73,507

Lifetime map wins

37,906dust2
9,853inferno
3,308nuke
1,426vertigo
1,278train
774cbble
461office
85italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

836Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
70.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10455%1.0114.5
Anubis6760%1.0114.2
Dust26659%0.9013.1
Mirage5149%0.9915.8
Inferno4255%1.2414.8
Overpass3459%1.1215.4
Nuke3352%1.0613.6
Vertigo1638%1.1015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
28.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.8%Spray accuracy
63.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
631msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.78HE damage / grenade
7.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7388% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–16-0.0417%20 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0313%19 Sept
dust211–13-0.0015%19 Sept
dust22–13-0.0221%18 Sept
ancient16–120.0413%18 Sept
ancient13–110.0013%18 Sept
anubis13–80.0717%18 Sept
dust26–13-0.0319%18 Sept
dust29–13-0.0243%18 Sept
inferno3–130.0210%18 Sept
inferno13–80.086%18 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0217%18 Sept
dust25–130.0110%16 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0311%16 Sept
nuke5–13-0.083%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0112%15 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0117%15 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0617%13 Sept
mirage13–110.0419%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0312%12 Sept
dust213–10.0314%11 Sept
dust25–13-0.0215%11 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0219%7 Sept
dust213–40.019%7 Sept
mirage16–120.0119%7 Sept
dust214–16-0.0615%6 Sept
dust210–130.0122%6 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0416%6 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0315%5 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0112%5 Sept
dust213–00.0130%5 Sept
nuke13–40.0723%5 Sept
dust213–100.0217%5 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0216%5 Sept
dust213–90.0321%5 Sept
cache13–3-0.0323%5 Sept
dust213–20.0216%5 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0716%5 Sept
dust215–15-0.0523%5 Sept
ancient13–40.1420%5 Sept
dust213–80.0128%4 Sept
dust213–110.0624%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.005%4 Sept
mirage13–50.0513%4 Sept
ancient9–130.029%2 Sept
anubis13–100.056%2 Sept
dust213–60.0310%2 Sept
ancient13–60.0121%2 Sept
nuke10–130.0115%2 Sept
dust213–50.1015%2 Sept
dust22–13-0.0316%1 Sept
cache13–90.0418%1 Sept
anubis17–190.0117%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.1021%31 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0615%29 Aug
dust23–13-0.074%29 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0211%29 Aug
dust213–7-0.0117%29 Aug
ancient13–90.0427%29 Aug
ancient13–160.0213%27 Aug
mirage13–110.1010%27 Aug
dust216–140.0515%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0429%22 Aug
dust210–130.0418%22 Aug
ancient17–19-0.058%21 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0415%21 Aug
dust29–130.0319%21 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.027%21 Aug
ancient13–30.0310%17 Aug
dust213–40.0017%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.019%15 Aug
ancient13–10.1425%15 Aug
mirage13–40.0323%15 Aug
dust25–130.0324%15 Aug
nuke13–40.0410%9 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1423%8 Aug
ancient13–90.069%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0121%8 Aug
cache3–130.0021%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0316%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0320%7 Aug
mirage13–8-0.029%7 Aug
ancient0–50.0229%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0315%7 Aug
nuke13–11-0.086%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0518%6 Aug
dust213–110.0514%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0715%4 Aug
inferno11–130.0018%3 Aug
inferno13–50.1124%1 Aug
dust26–130.0117%31 Jul
mirage15–150.0220%31 Jul
dust213–60.0815%31 Jul
dust26–130.0412%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0016%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0621%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0413%30 Jul
mirage13–10.074%30 Jul
nuke14–160.0320%30 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0322%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →