CewiaD

CewiaD — CS2 Stats

76561198030428777[U:1:70163049]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,856Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,276Blue band · top ~32.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,799 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,276 -312 17 Sept – 27 Oct · 25 days played
11,73615,607peak 15,60717 Sept27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,799 +0 17 Sept – 19 Oct · 2 observations
1,7991,799peak 1,79917 Sept19 Oct
15,896Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,799Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,799
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 202 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,331 below peak (15,607)
  • -1,098 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 724 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCewiaDFACEITLevel 7 · 1,799 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER14,276 · Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,799csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning61
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–60–1Last 10039%Win rateLLWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −113ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility7.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.1
Utility7.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time639ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 13 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 13 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · office, 8 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 17% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD183–1517%0.01
nukeS1711–665%0.01
ancientC145–936%-0.01
dust2D143–1121%-0.00
mirageD134–931%0.02
anubisB115–645%-0.00
cacheS64–267%0.02
office—22–0100%0.05
italy—22–0100%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
shelter—10–10%-0.02
boulder—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,035Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
71.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12753%0.8613.1
Inferno10557%1.0215.4
Nuke9865%0.9413.6
Anubis9444%0.9214.2
Dust29445%0.9213.3
Mirage7734%0.8513.6
Overpass2540%0.9013.6
Train1464%0.9512.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
639msReaction time
54.1%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
10.48HE damage / grenade
14.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0921%29 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0410%28 Oct →
anubis13–110.0023%27 Oct →
nuke13–110.0021%27 Oct →
dust214–160.0325%26 Oct →
ancient13–110.0621%25 Oct →
ancient13–80.0820%25 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0817%25 Oct →
dust213–40.0532%25 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0913%24 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.1311%24 Oct →
nuke13–100.0233%24 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0433%24 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0120%24 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0316%24 Oct →
mirage13–70.0925%24 Oct →
mirage13–70.0814%22 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0117%22 Oct →
ancient5–130.0620%19 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0529%19 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0613%18 Oct →
inferno14–160.0021%18 Oct →
office13–80.0332%18 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0023%18 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.075%18 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0124%18 Oct →
cache13–70.0329%17 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0315%17 Oct →
cache13–90.0715%17 Oct →
anubis13–90.1119%17 Oct →
anubis13–50.0631%17 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0624%16 Oct →
italy13–4-0.0713%16 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0016%16 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0028%16 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0131%15 Oct →
dust23–130.0123%15 Oct →
anubis0–6-0.0725%15 Oct →
dust28–130.0425%15 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0423%15 Oct →
ancient13–90.0417%15 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0418%15 Oct →
nuke13–90.0321%15 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0328%15 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0117%15 Oct →
dust212–160.0325%15 Oct →
anubis13–90.0020%15 Oct →
nuke13–80.0523%15 Oct →
nuke7–130.0330%14 Oct →
nuke11–130.0920%14 Oct →
dust29–130.0318%14 Oct →
mirage5–130.0628%14 Oct →
inferno11–130.0121%13 Oct →
cache13–90.0533%13 Oct →
inferno7–130.0117%13 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0114%13 Oct →
inferno13–20.2130%13 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0250%13 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0420%12 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0240%12 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0214%11 Oct →
dust213–50.0123%11 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0033%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0521%11 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0026%10 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0223%10 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0423%9 Oct →
vertigo4–13-0.0325%9 Oct →
shelter5–13-0.0248%9 Oct →
boulder12–120.0429%8 Oct →
italy13–70.0321%8 Oct →
office9–20.0725%8 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0425%8 Oct →
ancient9–130.0429%7 Oct →
mirage13–160.0219%7 Oct →
mirage13–20.1129%7 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0221%7 Oct →
inferno14–160.0228%7 Oct →
anubis13–90.0119%7 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0041%7 Oct →
mirage10–130.0224%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.1017%3 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.0118%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0118%2 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0723%1 Oct →
anubis9–130.0236%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0123%1 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0118%1 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0436%29 Sept →
nuke13–60.0129%29 Sept →
inferno13–90.0219%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0410%28 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0612%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0334%28 Sept →
inferno10–130.0726%28 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0417%28 Sept →
ancient13–160.0324%26 Sept →
inferno9–130.0318%26 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0219%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.2137%25 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.