mido ✌

mido ✌ — CS2 Stats

76561198029454179[U:1:69188451]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,845Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,559Top 25% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24645 of 227797 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,363 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,559 -5,387 30 May18 Sept · 12 days played
24,55929,946peak 29,94630 May18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,363 +0 2 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
2,3632,363peak 2,3632 Sept3 Sept
29,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,363Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,363
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 137 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,387 below peak (29,946)
  • -5,063 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 441 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmido ✌FACEITLevel 10 · 2,363 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,559 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,363csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning68
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +57ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.8
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time509ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 9 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · ancient, 2 Jun
344msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · inferno, 31 May
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24111346%0.00
dust2B21111052%0.02
cacheS1410471%0.02
anubisA148657%0.03
ancientB115645%0.03
mirageD62433%-0.02
nukeB63350%0.03
vertigo220100%-0.01
fachwerk1010%0.01
train110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,637Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis44455%1.1415.8
Inferno32648%1.1415.7
Ancient29349%1.0615.5
Dust221948%1.0014.8
Mirage17150%1.0014.6
Nuke15153%1.0514.8
Vertigo10949%1.0715.6
Overpass7344%1.0515.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
505msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
63.6%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.34HE damage / grenade
14.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4456 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8237% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0416%18 Sept
cache13–30.0439%18 Sept
inferno13–30.0226%18 Sept
anubis13–20.0314%18 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0120%15 Sept
anubis13–60.0219%15 Sept
inferno13–110.0521%13 Sept
inferno13–20.0725%13 Sept
dust24–60.0224%7 Sept
cache13–20.0529%3 Sept
cache13–50.0421%2 Sept
dust210–130.0428%31 Aug
inferno13–80.1017%31 Aug
dust213–30.0113%31 Aug
inferno22–180.0324%30 Aug
anubis13–80.1013%30 Aug
anubis5–130.0312%30 Aug
dust213–16-0.0132%30 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0014%30 Aug
nuke13–10.0521%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0416%30 Aug
nuke13–60.0220%29 Aug
cache13–60.0631%29 Aug
inferno13–100.1022%29 Aug
ancient2–130.0428%29 Aug
cache13–80.0325%29 Aug
cache13–8-0.0228%28 Aug
dust24–130.0015%27 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0018%27 Aug
cache11–130.0422%27 Aug
mirage13–80.0021%27 Aug
dust213–110.1022%26 Aug
anubis11–130.0328%26 Aug
inferno11–130.0031%26 Aug
dust212–16-0.0125%25 Aug
dust213–90.0014%25 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0325%25 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0513%25 Aug
cache9–130.0127%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0214%24 Aug
nuke13–20.0620%24 Aug
dust213–40.1324%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0726%24 Aug
inferno6–130.0023%24 Aug
inferno13–90.0127%23 Aug
nuke12–120.0720%23 Aug
mirage5–130.0117%18 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0620%17 Aug
cache14–16-0.0121%12 Aug
dust213–10.1428%9 Aug
cache13–20.0341%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0223%5 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0016%4 Aug
mirage11–130.0224%3 Aug
fachwerk10–130.0114%3 Aug
vertigo13–60.0328%3 Aug
anubis13–60.1115%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0215%1 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0433%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0121%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0119%14 Jul
dust213–8-0.0820%14 Jul
cache13–10-0.0315%13 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0529%12 Jul
cache7–13-0.0123%9 Jul
ancient5–130.0426%6 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0123%6 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0320%6 Jul
inferno10–130.0027%29 Jun
dust210–130.0128%28 Jun
vertigo13–3-0.0519%28 Jun
cache13–90.0229%25 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0333%25 Jun
dust29–13-0.0615%21 Jun
dust213–2-0.0431%21 Jun
train13–60.1127%17 Jun
ancient7–130.0521%15 Jun
ancient13–60.0332%15 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0317%15 Jun
anubis4–130.0115%11 Jun
cache13–90.0225%8 Jun
dust213–100.0221%8 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0521%7 Jun
dust213–100.0425%7 Jun
dust213–70.0326%6 Jun
anubis13–90.0321%6 Jun
dust215–150.0828%6 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0122%6 Jun
inferno5–130.0024%2 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0023%2 Jun
dust29–130.0221%2 Jun
anubis13–20.0524%2 Jun
ancient4–10.0750%2 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0133%31 May
ancient5–130.0123%31 May
mirage13–9-0.0326%31 May
nuke4–13-0.0425%31 May
dust213–80.0314%30 May
anubis13–40.1322%30 May
mirage5–13-0.0721%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →