esp1k

esp1k — CS2 Stats

76561198029383788[U:1:69118060]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,034Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,061 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,061 → 3,061
+46Tracked matches · now 3,034
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 77 days played since 31 Dec 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,564 +1,833 31 Dec12 Mar · 2 days played
23,73125,564peak 25,56431 Dec12 Mar
Faceit ELO: 3,061 +0 28 Aug2 Sept · 3 observations
3,0613,061peak 3,06128 Aug2 Sept
25,564Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,061Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
77Days played since 2024-12-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,061
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 439 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGesp1kFACEITLevel 10 · 3,061 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,061csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning57
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateWWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time542ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy28.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 30.1% → last ⅓ avg 28.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 26 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 9 Mar
313msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · mirage, 14 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2091145%-0.02
mirageB189950%0.01
infernoB179853%0.03
ancientS1510567%0.00
nukeS128467%0.01
trainA74357%0.03
overpassA53260%0.00
anubis42250%-0.00
office1010%0.01
cache110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

9,691Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage88052%1.0415.7
Dust272352%1.0916.0
Ancient52749%1.0816.0
Inferno36256%1.1816.8
Anubis35348%1.0615.8
Nuke26554%1.1416.4
Overpass19151%1.2017.1
Train9058%1.1317.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
542msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
7.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6453% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0731%9 Sept
dust213–40.0823%9 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0124%6 Sept
dust28–13-0.0529%2 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0626%1 Sept
inferno13–70.1230%1 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0136%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0327%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0327%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0335%20 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0828%14 Aug
ancient13–10.0916%13 Aug
dust213–40.0540%29 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0119%6 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0227%6 Jul
nuke16–120.0723%5 Jul
nuke13–110.0328%5 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0423%4 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0423%29 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0221%28 Jun
inferno14–160.0133%24 Jun
office5–130.0138%17 May
cache13–80.1030%6 May
dust210–13-0.0932%6 May
ancient13–7-0.0329%21 Apr
mirage13–50.1226%21 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0321%4 Jan
ancient19–16-0.0525%26 Nov
dust213–70.0141%23 Nov
nuke13–11-0.0134%19 Nov
nuke13–60.1138%4 Nov
ancient7–13-0.0019%31 Oct
train13–50.0448%25 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0324%24 Oct
ancient13–70.0223%22 Oct
overpass5–13-0.0238%5 Oct
ancient10–13-0.0021%4 Oct
nuke4–13-0.0338%3 Oct
ancient13–70.0435%27 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0131%27 Sept
dust216–14-0.0126%11 Sept
inferno16–130.0229%6 Sept
overpass10–130.0129%24 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0128%23 Aug
nuke13–10.0132%21 Aug
ancient10–130.0319%17 Aug
train13–110.0641%17 Aug
ancient7–130.0125%12 Aug
dust213–11-0.0330%11 Aug
overpass13–110.0520%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0532%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0635%22 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0524%21 Jul
overpass13–60.0415%16 Jul
train17–190.0234%15 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0620%14 Jul
train11–13-0.0433%13 Jul
inferno6–130.0020%13 Jul
train11–130.0333%11 Jul
dust25–130.0232%10 Jul
mirage11–130.0237%9 Jul
inferno13–90.0639%9 Jul
inferno16–140.0228%9 Jul
mirage13–70.0433%6 Jul
inferno13–40.0928%30 Jun
ancient13–80.0625%29 Jun
inferno10–130.0128%19 May
inferno13–30.1828%26 Apr
mirage14–160.0831%18 Mar
mirage13–160.0132%13 Mar
mirage13–80.0136%12 Mar
inferno13–20.0523%12 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0437%9 Mar
nuke13–40.0650%9 Mar
dust25–13-0.0531%8 Mar
dust213–8-0.0336%8 Mar
dust28–13-0.0638%6 Mar
mirage13–80.1046%6 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0023%14 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0226%30 Jan
dust211–130.0426%28 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0320%26 Jan
mirage13–16-0.0223%26 Jan
dust24–13-0.0426%26 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0332%26 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0629%21 Jan
train13–110.0525%17 Jan
mirage13–100.0027%16 Jan
dust213–6-0.0130%14 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0327%12 Jan
dust211–13-0.0418%11 Jan
ancient19–170.0225%10 Jan
dust29–13-0.0435%10 Jan
nuke13–80.0133%10 Jan
inferno10–130.0233%9 Jan
nuke13–60.0121%9 Jan
mirage10–130.0220%9 Jan
dust213–8-0.0035%6 Jan
train13–110.0733%1 Jan
anubis13–30.0640%31 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →