Damikester — CS2 Stats

76561198029366273[U:1:69100545]✓ No bans

1,511Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,108Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2221 of 14635 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDamikesterPREMIER25,108 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression8.2
Utility3.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time487ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 487ms
Headshot accuracy27.9%−6.0%
first ⅓ avg 33.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–9
132Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2416867%0.03
anubisB22101245%0.02
cacheB20101050%0.03
infernoC114736%0.03
nukeC94544%0.03
dust2S86275%0.01
mirage4040%-0.01
overpass21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

320Matches
55%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
77.3ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4862%1.2416.2
Ancient3946%1.0314.7
Inferno3453%1.3616.4
Mirage2658%1.2417.4
Dust21540%1.0116.3
Vertigo1338%1.4514.5
Nuke1164%1.2819.0
Overpass1040%1.1416.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.9%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
473msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
8.92HE damage / grenade
7.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2545 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8281% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0736%25 Aug
anubis11–130.0424%25 Aug
dust23–13-0.0738%21 Aug
ancient6–4-0.0011%21 Aug
cache13–80.0132%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0320%18 Aug
cache13–80.1233%18 Aug
cache13–9-0.0132%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.0522%12 Aug
inferno15–150.0428%12 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0022%12 Aug
ancient15–150.0523%11 Aug
dust213–30.0831%11 Aug
inferno13–20.1423%11 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0328%30 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0241%30 Jul
anubis6–130.0433%30 Jul
inferno13–30.0932%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0229%30 Jul
mirage5–130.0227%29 Jul
ancient13–40.0644%29 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0136%29 Jul
ancient8–130.0027%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0523%28 Jul
ancient13–50.1120%28 Jul
cache11–13-0.0629%27 Jul
anubis13–90.0822%27 Jul
anubis13–100.0227%27 Jul
cache14–160.0425%27 Jul
ancient13–100.1226%27 Jul
inferno13–50.0725%27 Jul
cache13–160.0424%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0730%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0030%24 Jul
nuke11–130.0524%23 Jul
anubis15–150.0132%23 Jul
cache13–90.1435%23 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0427%22 Jul
ancient7–130.0543%22 Jul
ancient13–110.0024%22 Jul
anubis13–60.1027%22 Jul
cache13–110.0326%22 Jul
ancient13–90.0143%22 Jul
ancient13–40.0234%20 Jul
anubis7–130.0335%20 Jul
nuke11–130.0542%20 Jul
cache12–160.0629%16 Jul
anubis13–110.0236%16 Jul
cache13–90.0741%16 Jul
inferno13–90.0437%16 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0123%16 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0833%15 Jul
ancient0–3-0.08100%15 Jul
ancient13–100.0437%15 Jul
anubis13–50.0213%15 Jul
cache6–13-0.0058%15 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0129%15 Jul
anubis13–30.0635%14 Jul
cache14–160.0330%14 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0329%13 Jul
nuke13–60.0629%13 Jul
ancient13–30.1437%13 Jul
anubis15–150.0327%13 Jul
inferno8–130.0035%10 Jul
cache13–70.0937%10 Jul
cache13–80.0429%10 Jul
cache13–9-0.0222%10 Jul
ancient13–60.0829%10 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0126%10 Jul
cache10–130.0433%10 Jul
dust216–14-0.0129%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0543%9 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0242%9 Jul
dust213–70.0639%9 Jul
anubis13–20.0738%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0629%5 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0538%5 Jul
dust213–110.0022%5 Jul
nuke13–50.0138%1 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0425%30 Jun
ancient13–50.1041%30 Jun
anubis11–130.0335%30 Jun
anubis13–80.0430%30 Jun
ancient6–130.0224%29 Jun
anubis7–130.0036%29 Jun
dust213–20.0629%29 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0035%29 Jun
dust213–100.0132%29 Jun
mirage4–13-0.1132%28 Jun
inferno7–130.0530%28 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0625%28 Jun
cache12–50.0535%28 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0144%28 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0426%27 Jun
nuke13–110.0836%26 Jun
mirage9–130.0739%26 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0530%26 Jun
overpass4–1-0.0250%25 Jun
ancient13–80.0530%25 Jun
ancient13–70.0244%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →