HodL

HodL — CS2 Stats

76561198026868561[U:1:66602833]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,615Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,034Top 50% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#67042 of 252187 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,652 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,034 +4,243 8 Sept – 15 Oct · 20 days played
16,79121,237peak 21,2378 Sept15 Oct
21,550Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,652Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-06-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,652
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 203 below peak (21,237)
  • +2,065 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,966 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHodLFACEITLevel 6 · 1,652 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,034 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,652csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning52
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLLWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time535ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 7 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 3 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 10 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2315–865%0.02
infernoB2111–1052%0.02
mirageB179–853%0.00
cacheS129–375%0.01
nukeD103–730%0.00
ancientC94–544%0.01
anubisB84–450%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

672Matches
49%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
75.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212743%0.9514.5
Inferno12355%1.1015.6
Mirage8946%1.0314.7
Anubis6849%0.9615.1
Nuke5551%0.9514.0
Ancient3946%0.9614.7
Vertigo3355%1.0615.9
Cache1650%0.9014.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
69.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
533msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
36.6%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
12.89HE damage / grenade
4.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.5908% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0418%15 Oct →
nuke5–130.0013%15 Oct →
cache13–60.0419%15 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0513%15 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0215%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0125%12 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0518%12 Oct →
ancient9–130.0217%10 Oct →
anubis13–20.0518%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0113%10 Oct →
mirage8–130.0221%10 Oct →
anubis14–160.0222%9 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.046%9 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0121%7 Oct →
nuke13–80.0315%7 Oct →
inferno9–130.019%5 Oct →
dust27–130.0614%5 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0318%5 Oct →
dust213–70.0315%5 Oct →
ancient13–30.0512%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0515%3 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.079%3 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0340%3 Oct →
inferno13–110.0619%3 Oct →
dust216–130.0522%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0617%3 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0418%2 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0431%2 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0420%2 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0322%2 Oct →
anubis13–20.0514%30 Sept →
dust216–130.0218%30 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0712%30 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0319%30 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0417%27 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0326%27 Sept →
anubis13–80.0720%27 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0220%27 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0022%25 Sept →
cache13–30.1013%25 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0213%24 Sept →
nuke8–130.0717%24 Sept →
inferno13–40.0618%24 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0027%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.028%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0218%23 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0318%20 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0118%20 Sept →
cache13–100.1229%20 Sept →
dust213–50.0214%20 Sept →
inferno13–20.0922%20 Sept →
ancient13–90.0630%19 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0012%19 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0424%19 Sept →
nuke3–130.0314%19 Sept →
cache7–130.0124%19 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0322%19 Sept →
inferno10–130.0720%19 Sept →
dust213–90.0531%19 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0021%19 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0310%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0213%18 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0223%18 Sept →
dust213–100.0212%18 Sept →
anubis13–110.0622%17 Sept →
dust213–60.0013%17 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0128%17 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.027%13 Sept →
inferno5–130.0219%13 Sept →
inferno9–130.0113%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.0215%13 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0223%13 Sept →
ancient13–70.0315%12 Sept →
cache13–70.0218%12 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0024%12 Sept →
mirage13–100.0818%12 Sept →
cache13–60.0117%12 Sept →
dust213–70.0811%12 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0210%8 Sept →
dust213–90.0918%8 Sept →
dust213–60.0716%8 Sept →
dust212–20.0528%8 Sept →
dust26–130.0513%7 Sept →
mirage13–20.2010%7 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0014%7 Sept →
inferno13–60.026%7 Sept →
cache13–70.0220%7 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0113%7 Sept →
cache13–5-0.008%7 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0612%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.006%5 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0615%5 Sept →
nuke10–130.0215%5 Sept →
inferno13–80.0534%1 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0020%1 Sept →
dust213–80.0417%1 Sept →
dust27–130.000%15 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0532%18 Jul →
inferno11–130.0417%27 Jun →
dust25–130.0029%27 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.