NLNDRKT

NLNDRKT — CS2 Stats

FR76561198026809431[U:1:66543703]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

640Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,854Top 50% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98108 of 252989 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,363 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,854 +1,469 22 Mar – 23 Sept · 41 days played
15,61318,957peak 18,95722 Mar23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,363 +0 1 Sept – 22 Sept · 3 observations
1,3631,363peak 1,3631 Sept22 Sept
18,957Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,363Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-03-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,363
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 168 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 103 below peak (18,957)
  • +3,241 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,146 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNLNDRKTFACEITLevel 7 · 1,363 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,854 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,363csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning53
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT42–53–5Last 10042%Win rateLWWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time623ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 25 Aug →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · dust2, 29 Aug →
297msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 6 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 34mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3420–1459%0.01
infernoC2710–1737%-0.01
nukeD165–1131%-0.01
mirageD61–517%-0.05
cacheD62–433%-0.03
ancientB63–350%-0.03
overpass—20–20%-0.03
anubis—21–150%-0.05
debris—10–10%-0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
47%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
72.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21070%1.1115.2
Nuke757%1.0215.9
Inferno560%0.8411.8
Anubis450%0.6711.3
Mirage10%0.8214.0
Ancient10%0.6712.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
634msReaction time
36.0%T opening success
42.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.52HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.9832% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0416%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0610%13 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0222%12 Sept →
nuke16–140.0616%12 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0225%11 Sept →
inferno13–90.1225%9 Sept →
cache13–20.0120%9 Sept →
nuke5–80.0310%3 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0520%29 Aug →
dust28–10.0760%29 Aug →
inferno8–130.0415%25 Aug →
dust213–30.1424%25 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0715%9 Aug →
dust213–80.0215%8 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0017%4 Aug →
dust25–130.0315%4 Aug →
inferno13–80.0023%2 Aug →
inferno13–60.0817%11 Jul →
dust21–13-0.078%11 Jul →
debris7–9-0.1617%10 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.1024%7 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0718%7 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0528%7 Jul →
inferno1–9-0.280%6 Jul →
inferno8–80.0622%5 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.1420%4 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0115%3 Jul →
dust213–60.0414%2 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0240%2 Jul →
inferno9–60.1118%1 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0812%23 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0522%23 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0226%8 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0821%4 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0223%31 May →
nuke6–13-0.0710%29 May →
inferno3–13-0.0126%29 May →
dust28–13-0.0139%27 May →
nuke14–160.0132%23 May →
inferno13–80.0021%22 May →
dust213–4-0.0240%21 May →
inferno5–13-0.0333%21 May →
ancient5–13-0.1025%20 May →
ancient13–50.0920%10 May →
dust213–9-0.0326%9 May →
dust213–100.0718%9 May →
dust213–80.0111%9 May →
dust213–110.0120%8 May →
inferno6–13-0.0415%4 May →
nuke11–130.0218%3 May →
inferno11–13-0.0217%2 May →
mirage3–13-0.070%2 May →
dust213–10-0.0315%1 May →
overpass2–60.0224%1 May →
dust211–130.0317%1 May →
cache5–13-0.0816%1 May →
dust216–130.0718%30 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0119%30 Apr →
dust213–3-0.0124%30 Apr →
cache8–13-0.0513%28 Apr →
cache13–20.0814%28 Apr →
nuke13–70.0015%28 Apr →
dust215–150.0426%28 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0412%27 Apr →
inferno13–70.0219%27 Apr →
dust27–130.0223%26 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0744%23 Apr →
dust27–13-0.120%23 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0448%23 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.107%23 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0117%22 Apr →
inferno13–90.0345%22 Apr →
nuke13–110.0418%10 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0223%10 Apr →
nuke0–9-0.0643%10 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0013%10 Apr →
nuke12–160.0220%9 Apr →
dust213–100.0315%9 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0223%7 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0929%7 Apr →
inferno6–130.0221%6 Apr →
mirage0–10-0.0433%6 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0217%4 Apr →
dust216–120.0430%3 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0219%3 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0213%2 Apr →
inferno15–15-0.0325%2 Apr →
inferno13–50.0215%30 Mar →
inferno9–40.1140%29 Mar →
inferno4–9-0.0518%29 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0418%29 Mar →
dust213–50.0932%29 Mar →
nuke9–130.0426%28 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0225%28 Mar →
inferno9–7-0.0224%28 Mar →
overpass11–13-0.0818%27 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0720%26 Mar →
nuke13–80.0416%23 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0225%22 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0324%22 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.