Faurholt1

Faurholt1 — CS2 Stats

DK76561198026275642[U:1:66009914]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

540Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,628 +1,730 21 Nov – 30 Aug · 11 days played
14,89819,999peak 19,99921 Nov30 Aug
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
66Days played since 2023-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFaurholt1FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning57
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–39–6Last 10055%Win rateWWLTWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +47ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 755ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility1.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.7
Utility1.9
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time650ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–2 · brewery, 27 Jun →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 16 Jul →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 10 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · train, 15 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
15–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2412–1250%0.02
dust2B189–950%-0.02
nukeA159–660%-0.01
mirageC104–640%0.00
overpassA106–460%-0.01
vertigoA74–357%-0.01
ancientS64–267%-0.03
anubis—43–175%0.00
train—33–0100%0.05
brewery—11–0100%0.28
mills—10–10%0.00
memento—10–10%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

479Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3847%1.2218.3
Dust23650%1.0715.6
Nuke3376%1.1916.1
Mirage2646%0.9815.7
Ancient1747%1.0616.6
Overpass729%0.7611.9
Vertigo617%1.0318.2
Anubis540%0.8713.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
650msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.53HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7473% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–6-0.0316%21 Mar →
dust213–90.0519%8 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0924%8 Feb →
inferno8–80.0516%2 Jul →
brewery9–20.2817%27 Jun →
inferno9–70.1017%27 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0113%20 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0521%14 Mar →
inferno13–30.0412%26 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0116%19 Feb →
inferno13–80.0321%12 Feb →
ancient13–90.0219%12 Feb →
dust213–3-0.016%12 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.067%7 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0913%31 Jan →
inferno17–190.0415%14 Jan →
dust28–2-0.0420%16 Dec →
ancient11–13-0.0315%15 Dec →
train8–50.0128%10 Dec →
dust212–12-0.0119%10 Dec →
nuke13–10-0.0218%20 Nov →
nuke13–40.0612%19 Nov →
overpass12–12-0.0120%19 Nov →
train13–80.0716%15 Nov →
train13–10.0526%15 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0512%23 Oct →
nuke13–40.0613%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0222%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0121%30 Aug →
inferno15–150.0118%29 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0422%27 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0816%19 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0429%19 Jul →
vertigo10–130.0511%18 Jul →
inferno28–31-0.0313%17 Jul →
mirage13–80.0921%17 Jul →
mills11–130.0014%17 Jul →
mirage13–60.0426%16 Jul →
inferno13–70.0537%16 Jul →
dust213–110.1224%12 Jul →
overpass13–40.0020%12 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0620%10 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0314%7 Jul →
memento8–80.0626%3 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0019%26 Jun →
mirage11–130.0414%26 Jun →
dust29–13-0.029%26 Jun →
nuke16–140.0117%9 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0823%23 May →
inferno13–100.0111%20 May →
inferno7–13-0.0018%19 May →
ancient13–5-0.056%5 May →
anubis13–6-0.029%1 May →
inferno5–13-0.1113%28 Apr →
nuke2–13-0.1032%16 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.057%10 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0329%8 Apr →
inferno14–160.0019%5 Apr →
anubis13–20.0713%5 Apr →
nuke14–16-0.0115%28 Feb →
anubis10–130.0013%18 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.038%18 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0118%18 Feb →
vertigo3–13-0.1317%17 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0415%17 Feb →
nuke13–110.0217%17 Feb →
inferno13–30.0522%17 Feb →
inferno16–130.1117%17 Feb →
vertigo13–110.0714%17 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0117%16 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.018%16 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0511%11 Feb →
mirage10–130.0211%10 Feb →
overpass4–13-0.0311%10 Feb →
overpass16–13-0.0118%10 Feb →
dust211–13-0.1125%7 Feb →
inferno13–110.1118%6 Feb →
mirage8–130.0017%3 Feb →
overpass13–110.0011%24 Jan →
nuke13–90.038%24 Jan →
vertigo13–60.0318%23 Jan →
ancient16–14-0.039%6 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0311%2 Jan →
overpass13–30.0020%12 Dec →
inferno13–40.1416%12 Dec →
mirage14–160.0223%21 Nov →
vertigo13–30.0015%21 Nov →
overpass13–90.087%21 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.024%27 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0014%25 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0215%18 Sept →
vertigo12–16-0.0614%17 Sept →
dust210–160.0215%17 Sept →
dust222–200.0513%16 Sept →
ancient16–140.018%16 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.1414%8 Sept →
vertigo16–14-0.0119%6 Sept →
nuke15–150.0615%5 Sept →
inferno11–16-0.028%5 Sept →
inferno16–70.1214%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.