ham on cat

ham on cat — CS2 Stats

SJ76561198025635178[U:1:65369450]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

344Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+11Tracked matches · now 344
−3.7ppWin rate · 51.8% → 48.1%

Rating over time

47Days played since 2024-11-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGham on catFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning66
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57–33–10Last 10057%Win rateLLLTWLLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.0
Utility6.5
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.7

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.6
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time576ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–0 · sanctum, 7 Feb →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 21 Feb →
320msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · poseidon, 22 Jan →
13–2Biggest win · alpine, 7 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7officeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB126–650%0.05
vertigoA95–456%0.04
poseidonB84–450%0.03
nukeS76–186%0.03
cacheA74–357%0.01
overpassS64–267%-0.01
mirageC52–340%-0.01
officeD51–420%0.00
dust2C52–340%0.03
alpineA53–260%0.02
sanctum—43–175%0.08
ancient—33–0100%0.06
train—31–233%-0.01
warden—20–20%0.05
stronghold—20–20%0.03
rooftop—22–0100%0.02
grail—22–0100%0.10
jura—21–150%-0.03
whistle—22–0100%0.05
anubis—10–10%0.00
golden—10–10%-0.01
palacio—10–10%-0.05
agency—11–0100%0.03
brewery—11–0100%0.07
dogtown—11–0100%0.09
edin—11–0100%-0.02
italy—11–0100%0.08
palais—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

438Matches
59%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
—ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo560%1.2214.6
Ancient560%2.1822.6
Overpass450%1.2825.0
Anubis333%1.1223.0
Inferno2100%2.0419.0
Nuke1100%1.5545.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
579msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
11.32HE damage / grenade
8.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3695% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0626%31 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0515%10 Oct →
office7–130.0721%7 Oct →
inferno12–120.0524%6 Oct →
cache13–80.0625%6 Oct →
poseidon5–90.0122%6 Oct →
overpass1–9-0.1319%6 Oct →
inferno9–10.2727%6 Oct →
inferno13–100.0616%29 Sept →
anubis15–150.0012%26 Sept →
inferno6–130.0117%26 Sept →
nuke13–80.0927%12 Sept →
ancient13–80.1120%3 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0130%15 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0633%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0425%15 Aug →
cache7–130.0220%15 Aug →
dust24–130.0317%14 Aug →
cache16–130.1031%14 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0214%6 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0814%23 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0516%23 Jun →
dust29–130.0419%23 Jun →
cache13–7-0.0324%5 Jun →
mirage13–80.0015%5 Jun →
inferno13–60.0928%5 Jun →
nuke16–140.0722%5 Jun →
dust213–90.0319%5 Jun →
vertigo9–40.035%5 Jun →
alpine12–12-0.0212%2 Jun →
inferno8–130.0221%29 May →
nuke13–90.0315%29 May →
vertigo9–30.1324%25 May →
poseidon9–6-0.0418%25 May →
overpass9–40.0339%25 May →
overpass0–9-0.2011%6 May →
vertigo5–9-0.0936%6 May →
cache6–13-0.0320%4 May →
cache2–6-0.090%2 May →
alpine13–50.0437%2 May →
cache13–100.0326%2 May →
vertigo7–90.0116%26 Apr →
nuke9–4-0.0828%9 Apr →
sanctum9–30.1431%21 Feb →
inferno9–20.0847%21 Feb →
office12–120.0524%21 Feb →
warden12–120.0520%9 Feb →
stronghold10–130.0316%9 Feb →
alpine13–8-0.0125%9 Feb →
alpine0–50.0638%9 Feb →
alpine13–20.0121%7 Feb →
stronghold4–130.0232%7 Feb →
warden3–130.0447%7 Feb →
sanctum9–00.3013%7 Feb →
vertigo9–10.209%7 Feb →
vertigo8–80.0237%7 Feb →
nuke9–20.0417%7 Feb →
poseidon9–40.0318%3 Feb →
sanctum9–30.0419%3 Feb →
poseidon9–6-0.0042%23 Jan →
sanctum8–8-0.1420%23 Jan →
poseidon6–90.0124%23 Jan →
poseidon9–10.2619%23 Jan →
poseidon1–9-0.0833%22 Jan →
poseidon8–80.0430%22 Jan →
overpass9–50.0810%30 Dec →
inferno6–13-0.0632%9 Nov →
ancient13–100.0721%9 Nov →
overpass9–60.1024%15 Oct →
rooftop9–10.1140%15 Oct →
vertigo9–7-0.0046%15 Oct →
office10–13-0.0624%6 Oct →
golden6–13-0.0144%6 Oct →
palacio3–13-0.0527%6 Oct →
rooftop9–7-0.0810%6 Oct →
grail13–20.0132%11 Aug →
agency13–110.0325%11 Aug →
jura13–10-0.0029%11 Aug →
overpass9–40.0916%19 Jul →
vertigo9–30.0221%19 Jul →
brewery9–40.0729%19 Jul →
train5–13-0.0327%8 Jul →
jura5–13-0.060%2 Jun →
grail13–110.2023%2 Jun →
dogtown9–20.0920%10 May →
mirage13–90.1028%8 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0138%7 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0220%27 Feb →
edin13–3-0.0223%2 Feb →
office6–13-0.1112%28 Jan →
whistle9–5-0.1216%26 Jan →
whistle9–10.2135%26 Jan →
train12–120.0121%16 Jan →
italy13–70.0826%16 Jan →
train13–7-0.0232%4 Jan →
office13–90.0731%4 Jan →
palais9–50.0915%31 Dec →
nuke9–10.1230%21 Nov →
inferno13–100.0124%15 Nov →
inferno13–40.1628%15 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.