GARYLEAO

GARYLEAO — CS2 Stats

VE76561198022045976[U:1:61780248]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,732Tracked matches34%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,221Top 10% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19919 of 261653 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,740 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,221 +3,424 22 Sept – 12 Nov · 32 days played
21,79427,325peak 27,32522 Sept12 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,740 +0 17 Oct – 31 Oct · 2 observations
1,7401,740peak 1,74017 Oct31 Oct
27,563Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,740Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-09-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,740
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 11 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-10-17
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-10-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,104 below peak (27,325)
  • -1,464 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,779 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-10-17
  • Pink band first seen 2026-10-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGARYLEAOFACEITLevel 8 · 1,740 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,221 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,740csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning60
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWLLLTWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time545ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 4 Nov →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 7 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 11 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2515–1060%0.01
mirageC198–1142%0.01
infernoS1410–471%0.01
ancientB126–650%-0.01
anubisC114–736%-0.00
nukeC104–640%0.00
cacheC94–544%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

854Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
83.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno22050%1.0115.5
Dust219350%1.0816.3
Ancient18550%1.1116.2
Mirage14449%1.0215.7
Anubis6048%1.0515.6
Nuke2748%0.9814.9
Overpass1250%0.9217.1
Train560%0.9514.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
543msReaction time
62.3%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
8.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.21% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–11-0.037%12 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0311%12 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0214%12 Nov →
cache14–16-0.0313%9 Nov →
anubis15–150.0214%5 Nov →
ancient16–140.0118%5 Nov →
dust26–13-0.095%5 Nov →
dust213–100.0216%4 Nov →
mirage13–90.1426%4 Nov →
mirage13–20.0720%4 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0412%3 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0324%29 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0114%29 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0410%26 Oct →
mirage13–110.028%26 Oct →
ancient8–130.0115%22 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0413%22 Oct →
dust211–80.0414%22 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.047%22 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0316%19 Oct →
dust24–130.0518%19 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0020%18 Oct →
inferno13–100.0416%17 Oct →
anubis13–80.0010%17 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0110%17 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0918%17 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0012%16 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0512%16 Oct →
dust216–130.0121%16 Oct →
inferno6–130.0218%15 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0319%15 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0216%15 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0121%14 Oct →
mirage6–130.0315%14 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.018%14 Oct →
dust29–130.0212%13 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0014%13 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0122%13 Oct →
dust211–130.0212%12 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0322%12 Oct →
dust213–11-0.038%12 Oct →
ancient15–150.0214%12 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0711%11 Oct →
dust213–90.138%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.0413%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0028%11 Oct →
dust27–13-0.1013%11 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0113%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0119%11 Oct →
ancient13–90.0824%10 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0412%9 Oct →
cache13–90.0116%9 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0210%9 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0415%9 Oct →
inferno9–30.1221%9 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0313%9 Oct →
nuke13–20.1131%7 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0215%7 Oct →
nuke5–130.0218%7 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0110%6 Oct →
dust213–60.0521%6 Oct →
dust213–90.008%6 Oct →
cache13–80.0417%6 Oct →
dust213–100.0730%6 Oct →
inferno13–90.0914%6 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0312%5 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.079%5 Oct →
anubis7–130.0210%5 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0122%5 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0321%4 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0213%3 Oct →
anubis13–80.0816%3 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0114%2 Oct →
inferno13–80.067%2 Oct →
anubis11–130.0415%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0114%1 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0619%1 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0122%1 Oct →
mirage13–160.0919%1 Oct →
dust215–150.0619%30 Sept →
cache13–50.0614%30 Sept →
nuke6–130.0327%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0224%30 Sept →
mirage13–100.0015%30 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0416%28 Sept →
dust213–110.0320%28 Sept →
dust213–110.0118%27 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0111%27 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0419%27 Sept →
nuke13–30.0513%27 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0012%26 Sept →
cache13–50.0621%26 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0213%26 Sept →
dust213–40.0619%25 Sept →
nuke13–70.0415%25 Sept →
cache8–130.077%25 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.084%25 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.049%23 Sept →
cache11–130.0121%23 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.038%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.