Rakkues

Rakkues — CS2 Stats

MY76561198021751178[U:1:61485450]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

336Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,322Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,709Purple band · top ~17.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 336 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 1 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,709 +2,607 1 Apr17 Sept · 30 days played
15,10218,612peak 18,6121 Apr17 Sept
18,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-04-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 903 below peak (18,612)
  • -474 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,580 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,291 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=34,112), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate67.2%44.3%47.0%above
Shot accuracy16.6%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.031.080.18 short
Match win rate40.8%45.2%46.7%5.9% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRakkuesPREMIER17,709 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −102ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.7

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time633ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 30 Apr
57%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 18 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · cache, 14 Aug
13–3Biggest win · inferno, 20 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1015In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.00
infernoC1881044%0.01
dust2D1331023%-0.00
cacheS128467%0.00
anubisS86275%-0.00
overpassC83538%-0.01
nukeB63350%0.02
ancientD62433%-0.01
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

118,044Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
3,054Matches
40.8%Match win rate
67.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Purple band
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
6,584MVPs
4,322Hours (in match)
2,045Bombs planted
553Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4759,548
AWP7,365
P2502,038
FAMAS1,114
Knife955

Lifetime map wins

4,804dust2
3,029inferno
811nuke
583vertigo
338office
302train
183cbble
151italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
55%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
632msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2908% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0426%25 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0757%18 Aug
cache13–70.0119%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.0024%18 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0213%14 Aug
mirage16–130.0221%14 Aug
cache13–9-0.0224%14 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0518%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.059%11 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0119%11 Aug
inferno15–150.0213%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0829%3 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0229%2 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0330%2 Aug
cache13–90.0521%1 Aug
cache13–80.0724%30 Jul
cache11–13-0.0119%30 Jul
inferno13–100.0326%29 Jul
cache13–110.0027%29 Jul
inferno16–120.0118%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.0627%19 Jul
cache13–110.0120%19 Jul
inferno14–160.0522%19 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0043%19 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0125%30 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0222%30 Jun
nuke14–160.0124%23 Jun
dust27–130.0327%23 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0227%23 Jun
mirage13–60.1023%23 Jun
inferno13–30.0531%20 Jun
dust213–16-0.0316%20 Jun
mirage10–130.0225%20 Jun
anubis13–90.0324%20 Jun
inferno12–160.0135%16 Jun
dust26–130.0420%16 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0614%16 Jun
overpass11–13-0.069%16 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0224%16 Jun
dust27–13-0.0117%16 Jun
mirage13–7-0.036%16 Jun
inferno14–160.0119%16 Jun
ancient13–70.0321%15 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0529%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0932%12 Jun
dust216–140.0133%30 May
mirage11–130.0123%30 May
mirage13–60.0447%8 May
anubis13–7-0.0813%8 May
nuke13–100.0336%8 May
mirage13–80.0433%3 May
dust211–13-0.1019%3 May
mirage1–13-0.0830%3 May
vertigo13–9-0.0126%3 May
inferno13–90.0625%3 May
nuke13–80.1631%30 Apr
cache11–130.0125%30 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0617%30 Apr
dust213–80.0233%30 Apr
cache13–70.0036%30 Apr
cache13–110.0156%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.0438%29 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0119%26 Apr
overpass11–130.0022%26 Apr
mirage8–130.0220%26 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0128%25 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0021%25 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0317%25 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0133%25 Apr
ancient15–150.0329%24 Apr
overpass13–100.0836%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0641%24 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0443%22 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0329%22 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0320%22 Apr
ancient16–140.0319%18 Apr
anubis13–30.1132%18 Apr
mirage5–130.0022%18 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0232%17 Apr
dust28–130.0120%17 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0122%17 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0330%17 Apr
dust211–130.0119%13 Apr
mirage11–130.0720%13 Apr
overpass13–50.0322%11 Apr
dust211–130.0133%11 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0210%11 Apr
mirage2–130.0332%11 Apr
dust29–130.0230%11 Apr
mirage16–120.0322%10 Apr
inferno13–100.0343%10 Apr
dust213–11-0.0129%10 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0223%7 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0145%7 Apr
inferno13–60.0441%7 Apr
inferno13–100.0238%6 Apr
mirage16–120.0334%6 Apr
mirage16–120.0225%5 Apr
mirage4–130.1034%5 Apr
mirage0–13-0.1322%1 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →