Bentsen

Bentsen — CS2 Stats

76561198021064118[U:1:60798390]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,849Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3 · 834 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,464 -302 28 May – 29 Jun · 16 days played
10,46111,910peak 11,91028 May29 Jun
11,910Peak Premier in tracked matches
834Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2026-05-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 834
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBentsenFACEITLevel 3 · 834 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO834csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning54
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateWLLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +78ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility4.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics2.6
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time539ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy11.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 11.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 9 Aug →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 14 Jun →
367msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 21 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 46% over 28mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2813–1546%-0.03
nukeB2612–1446%-0.03
ancientC146–843%-0.02
mirageD93–633%-0.03
dust2C83–538%-0.00
anubisD62–433%-0.02
overpass—44–0100%-0.01
cache—31–233%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.19
poseidon—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

692Matches
49%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
65.0ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno17653%0.8111.5
Nuke13964%0.8912.5
Ancient12239%0.7411.5
Anubis7246%0.9313.0
Mirage6542%0.8613.3
Dust23923%0.7412.3
Train3050%0.7211.6
Vertigo1844%0.9513.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.0%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.2%Spray accuracy
61.5%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
0.8%Flash assists
7.79HE damage / grenade
5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.9851% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4628 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0224%2 Nov →
vertigo0–8-0.1910%29 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.005%29 Oct →
ancient13–90.0811%27 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0414%22 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0518%22 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.045%17 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0614%17 Oct →
nuke17–19-0.038%17 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.007%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.068%16 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.097%15 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.074%8 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.056%8 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.056%8 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.049%3 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.077%2 Oct →
inferno13–50.0517%25 Sept →
dust213–10-0.019%24 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0215%21 Sept →
anubis8–130.039%20 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.044%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0420%17 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.065%16 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.083%14 Sept →
inferno13–80.0113%14 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0522%13 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0220%12 Sept →
cache12–6-0.0117%12 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0218%10 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0414%9 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.075%7 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0710%7 Sept →
ancient16–140.0411%3 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.037%31 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0310%28 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0413%28 Aug →
poseidon1–7-0.0525%26 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.180%26 Aug →
nuke9–5-0.0719%25 Aug →
inferno0–9-0.2318%25 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.0610%24 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0724%22 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0211%19 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.008%16 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0114%15 Aug →
inferno6–90.0215%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.0510%12 Aug →
nuke11–130.0312%12 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.075%12 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0419%11 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0113%10 Aug →
nuke9–1-0.0725%10 Aug →
dust213–50.128%9 Aug →
cache12–12-0.038%8 Aug →
nuke2–130.0513%8 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.025%6 Aug →
nuke13–70.062%5 Aug →
anubis25–21-0.0410%4 Aug →
dust213–30.1016%3 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0613%16 Jul →
ancient13–80.0216%16 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0111%16 Jul →
nuke20–22-0.0011%16 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0917%29 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0115%28 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.1124%28 Jun →
dust22–13-0.055%27 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0811%26 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0712%26 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0411%26 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0211%26 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.027%25 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.054%21 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.1011%15 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.039%14 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.046%14 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.079%14 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0129%14 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.058%14 Jun →
inferno17–19-0.0512%13 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.039%13 Jun →
ancient2–130.019%13 Jun →
inferno6–130.006%13 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0225%11 Jun →
nuke13–70.025%10 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.029%9 Jun →
overpass19–16-0.069%9 Jun →
nuke13–7-0.035%7 Jun →
inferno13–60.019%6 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0114%6 Jun →
nuke15–150.026%4 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.049%3 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.033%2 Jun →
anubis13–80.033%1 Jun →
overpass13–90.058%1 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.083%30 May →
overpass13–9-0.027%29 May →
dust28–130.0217%28 May →
mirage13–11-0.0116%28 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.