Mongolian Warlord

Mongolian Warlord — CS2 Stats

FI76561198016664072[U:1:56398344]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,675Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,129Hours in CS45Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating24,335Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26770 of 231518 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,335 → 24,335
+1Tracked matches · now 1,675
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 11 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,335 +312 11 Aug16 Sept · 25 days played
20,81024,999peak 24,99911 Aug16 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-08-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 664 below peak (24,999)
  • +1,921 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 665 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches961−52
Win rate67%56%+11pp
K/D1.091.09−0.00
Headshot %45%45%−0pp

Measured 11 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate37.7%45.7%46.8%9.1% short
Shot accuracy7.0%12.7%13.0%6.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.051.06meets
Match win rate45.9%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMongolian WarlordFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,335 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning49
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility7.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch7.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.9
Utility7.3
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time546ms+22ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 4 Sept
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · mirage, 6 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 11 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 2 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2191243%-0.01
dust2B20101050%-0.01
ancientS1812667%0.00
nukeC1661038%-0.02
infernoS128467%0.01
cacheA85363%-0.01
anubisS54180%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,441Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,654Matches
45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
37.7%Headshot %
7.0%Shot accuracy
8,936MVPs
1,962Hours (in match)
5,174Bombs planted
1,097Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,521dust2
5,921inferno
5,473nuke
1,594vertigo
847train
587office
378cbble
40safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

48Matches
69%Win rate
1.48Avg K/D
96.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win
45%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1464%1.6816.3
Anubis875%1.4515.5
Dust2875%1.5518.4
Cache540%0.9113.4
Nuke5100%1.7919.2
Ancient475%1.5419.5
Inferno367%1.0515.7
Vertigo10%0.7213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
554msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.14HE damage / grenade
11.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8602% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient12–160.0115%11 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0117%10 Sept
inferno7–130.017%10 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0113%9 Sept
inferno13–30.0019%8 Sept
ancient3–13-0.026%8 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0117%8 Sept
inferno13–90.029%8 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0526%8 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0927%8 Sept
anubis13–110.0115%7 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0314%7 Sept
dust212–16-0.0612%7 Sept
ancient13–70.0821%7 Sept
cache9–13-0.0327%7 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0522%6 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0214%6 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0335%6 Sept
cache11–13-0.0514%5 Sept
cache13–10-0.0110%5 Sept
ancient13–110.0313%5 Sept
dust213–20.1220%4 Sept
dust213–100.0419%4 Sept
anubis13–80.0110%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0313%3 Sept
dust213–110.0316%3 Sept
cache13–7-0.0320%3 Sept
inferno5–130.0124%3 Sept
dust210–130.0011%3 Sept
inferno13–00.0313%2 Sept
dust216–13-0.0115%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0312%1 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0517%1 Sept
cache13–100.068%1 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0711%1 Sept
dust213–100.0114%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0015%31 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0521%31 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0112%31 Aug
dust213–100.0711%31 Aug
ancient13–110.0012%31 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0521%30 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0214%30 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0526%30 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0316%30 Aug
nuke13–70.0521%30 Aug
cache13–90.0120%29 Aug
inferno11–130.0418%29 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0517%29 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0426%29 Aug
dust216–130.0115%29 Aug
ancient13–60.0317%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0310%29 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0117%29 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0013%29 Aug
dust213–9-0.0519%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0125%29 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0122%28 Aug
mirage2–13-0.048%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0018%28 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0216%27 Aug
dust214–16-0.0219%27 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0518%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0412%24 Aug
inferno13–90.0427%24 Aug
dust28–13-0.0010%24 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0124%22 Aug
inferno13–40.0329%22 Aug
mirage4–130.0115%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.0219%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0316%22 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0215%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0213%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0424%21 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0314%20 Aug
nuke6–13-0.069%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0315%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0521%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0120%20 Aug
inferno13–40.0024%19 Aug
dust212–16-0.0420%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0518%19 Aug
nuke13–10.0924%19 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0615%17 Aug
dust213–4-0.048%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0219%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0415%17 Aug
mirage3–130.0412%17 Aug
cache13–100.0111%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0513%14 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0721%14 Aug
ancient13–110.019%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.116%14 Aug
ancient9–130.0117%12 Aug
dust214–16-0.0325%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0224%11 Aug
ancient13–60.0320%11 Aug
ancient13–50.0520%11 Aug
mirage13–100.0217%11 Aug
nuke5–130.0112%11 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →