Zbag

Zbag — CS2 Stats

US76561198012127866[U:1:51862138]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,420Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,896Purple band · top ~20.9% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,896 +940 28 Jul – 16 Oct · 39 days played
15,64717,676peak 17,67628 Jul16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,280 +0 28 Aug – 4 Sept · 3 observations
1,2801,280peak 1,28028 Aug4 Sept
17,676Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,280Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,280
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 71 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 780 below peak (17,676)
  • -113 over 30 days · steady
  • +940 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,104 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZbagPREMIER16,896 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,280csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning44
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility6.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–3 · office, 14 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · vertigo, 29 Aug →
219msFastest reaction time · 1–2 · office, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2413–1154%-0.02
infernoC177–1041%-0.01
officeB168–850%0.02
nukeA117–464%-0.02
ancientB105–550%-0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.00
overpass—43–175%0.01
anubis—30–30%-0.04
mirage—31–233%-0.01
vertigo—32–167%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
76%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
66.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1090%1.2313.6
Dust2580%0.9713.6
Nuke250%0.549.5
Vertigo2100%0.568.0
Anubis250%0.446.5
Train20%0.8813.5
Overpass2100%0.5811.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
532msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
33.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.17HE damage / grenade
6.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.4981° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office11–13-0.066%16 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0821%16 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0712%15 Oct →
office13–30.1024%14 Oct →
cache13–90.0215%14 Oct →
overpass13–70.0518%12 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0225%12 Oct →
cache12–12-0.1015%12 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0023%12 Oct →
office13–40.0823%11 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0635%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0129%10 Oct →
overpass13–8-0.0118%10 Oct →
cache13–80.0121%9 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0417%8 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0422%7 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0513%7 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0713%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.0110%6 Oct →
office13–90.0116%5 Oct →
ancient16–120.0322%4 Oct →
nuke13–90.0521%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0215%3 Oct →
dust28–130.0021%3 Oct →
inferno13–100.0310%2 Oct →
office7–13-0.029%30 Sept →
cache10–130.0410%29 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0713%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0219%26 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.029%25 Sept →
dust26–13-0.079%24 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0417%23 Sept →
dust213–40.0119%23 Sept →
overpass13–100.0117%20 Sept →
office12–120.0616%16 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0410%16 Sept →
office13–11-0.0024%15 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0417%14 Sept →
inferno13–90.0128%12 Sept →
dust216–14-0.067%12 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0117%12 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.008%11 Sept →
office13–110.0416%10 Sept →
office1–2-0.020%9 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0619%8 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0116%7 Sept →
office13–70.0327%5 Sept →
ancient9–130.0233%4 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0532%4 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0322%3 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0426%30 Aug →
cache13–70.0521%30 Aug →
overpass5–13-0.0220%29 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0340%29 Aug →
office9–20.0432%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0523%26 Aug →
ancient8–130.0419%24 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0321%24 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0124%20 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0519%20 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0319%18 Aug →
dust29–13-0.043%18 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0218%17 Aug →
dust213–4-0.007%13 Aug →
nuke1–13-0.0311%12 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0215%12 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0312%10 Aug →
cache13–30.0320%10 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0613%8 Aug →
nuke13–100.0117%8 Aug →
office7–11-0.0325%6 Aug →
office5–130.0031%6 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0413%5 Aug →
ancient14–160.0023%4 Aug →
dust213–100.0213%4 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0317%2 Aug →
dust216–130.0121%1 Aug →
inferno8–130.0513%1 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0111%31 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0124%29 Jul →
inferno13–10.0519%29 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.040%28 Jul →
dust213–90.0014%28 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0223%28 Jul →
dust213–100.0423%27 Jul →
office10–130.0413%26 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0320%26 Jul →
inferno9–130.0310%24 Jul →
inferno13–40.0517%24 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0616%23 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0025%23 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0419%23 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0311%22 Jul →
office13–70.0610%20 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0216%20 Jul →
dust213–10-0.057%20 Jul →
inferno14–160.0428%18 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0120%18 Jul →
dust213–60.0610%16 Jul →
office9–13-0.028%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.