a7fun

a7fun — CS2 Stats

DK76561198012049845[U:1:51784117]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,006Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,359Blue band · top ~37.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,480 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+409Premier CS Rating · 12,950 → 13,359

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,359 +1,513 31 Jul – 28 Oct · 22 days played
10,00014,909peak 14,90931 Jul28 Oct
14,951Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,480Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,480
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 51 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,550 below peak (14,909)
  • +739 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,513 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,641 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGa7funFACEITLevel 6 · 1,480 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER13,359 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,480csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning54
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time575ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 3 Aug →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 9 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 23 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2313–1057%0.01
mirageC197–1237%0.00
dust2B179–853%-0.00
ancientA169–756%0.02
anubisB115–645%-0.01
nukeD72–529%0.00
cacheS76–186%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,708Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
76.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno17358%1.1114.9
Anubis10844%0.8914.2
Nuke10858%0.9715.2
Dust210045%0.9314.7
Mirage7846%0.8914.6
Vertigo4245%0.9113.0
Train2955%1.0316.0
Ancient1747%0.8713.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
8.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0011%28 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0311%28 Oct →
mirage6–130.0217%20 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0114%7 Oct →
ancient9–130.0020%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.0013%3 Oct →
nuke8–130.0323%30 Sept →
ancient15–150.0330%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0422%30 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0921%29 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0520%28 Aug →
cache13–70.1021%28 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.039%28 Aug →
inferno13–50.048%23 Aug →
dust29–13-0.1020%23 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0325%23 Aug →
inferno13–100.0217%23 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0618%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.1322%23 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0919%23 Aug →
mirage13–70.048%23 Aug →
ancient13–110.0217%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0818%22 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0324%22 Aug →
anubis13–110.0110%22 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0220%22 Aug →
inferno13–90.1017%22 Aug →
nuke6–9-0.1740%22 Aug →
inferno8–130.0229%22 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0024%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0333%22 Aug →
dust213–40.0928%22 Aug →
inferno13–70.0628%22 Aug →
ancient13–40.0815%22 Aug →
ancient10–130.0725%22 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0019%21 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0726%21 Aug →
anubis13–60.0319%21 Aug →
ancient13–60.0920%19 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0311%19 Aug →
ancient13–70.0212%18 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.049%18 Aug →
dust213–20.0621%18 Aug →
nuke7–130.0228%18 Aug →
dust219–16-0.0426%17 Aug →
inferno13–20.1124%17 Aug →
nuke8–130.0527%17 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0216%16 Aug →
ancient13–90.1215%16 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.1110%16 Aug →
anubis13–30.1213%16 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.0817%16 Aug →
cache7–2-0.0222%16 Aug →
inferno15–150.0625%16 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.110%16 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0315%15 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0216%15 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0415%15 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0714%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0020%15 Aug →
mirage13–40.0417%15 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0331%15 Aug →
mirage13–10.0320%14 Aug →
mirage13–50.0719%14 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0212%14 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0523%14 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0112%13 Aug →
nuke13–110.0428%13 Aug →
dust213–70.0431%13 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0319%13 Aug →
inferno13–70.0317%13 Aug →
dust213–90.1031%13 Aug →
ancient13–10.0421%13 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0421%12 Aug →
dust213–70.0520%12 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0323%9 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0267%9 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0424%9 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0015%6 Aug →
inferno13–60.0621%6 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0120%5 Aug →
mirage6–130.0110%4 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0316%4 Aug →
dust213–100.0327%4 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0422%4 Aug →
inferno13–70.0747%4 Aug →
mirage11–130.0119%4 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0116%3 Aug →
mirage14–160.0622%3 Aug →
mirage13–10.1326%3 Aug →
nuke6–130.0429%3 Aug →
cache13–100.0625%3 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0328%3 Aug →
dust23–8-0.0611%3 Aug →
cache13–100.0219%3 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0135%1 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0020%31 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0319%31 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0023%31 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0613%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.