Tango

Tango — CS2 Stats

76561197961384024[U:1:1118296]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,131Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,824 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,824 → 1,824
+20Tracked matches · now 1,131
+3.3ppWin rate · 53.3% → 56.7%

Rating over time

1,824Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
65Days played since 2025-06-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,824
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 177 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTangoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,824 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,824csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning65
Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–51Last 10049%Win rateLWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.8
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.5
Utility7.8
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time586ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 15 Aug →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 13 Jul →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · cache, 3 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 15 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2615–1158%0.01
nukeB2312–1152%0.01
dust2C207–1335%0.01
anubisD103–730%0.01
cacheS64–267%0.02
trainA53–260%0.04
mirage—42–250%0.00
ancient—31–233%-0.02
overpass—32–167%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,322Matches
51%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
87.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno15962%1.4918.9
Nuke11358%1.3718.0
Dust29439%1.2217.6
Anubis9146%1.3118.5
Mirage5038%1.2918.9
Train3450%1.4319.5
Vertigo1833%1.1016.0
Cache1450%1.1817.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
579msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
13.9%Flash assists
14.45HE damage / grenade
15.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2886% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0215%22 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0012%7 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0122%14 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0019%3 Sept →
dust213–110.0626%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0115%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.0115%18 Aug →
anubis13–110.0521%18 Aug →
dust219–160.0214%17 Aug →
inferno13–20.0116%17 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0616%17 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0124%15 Aug →
cache13–60.1033%15 Aug →
mirage11–130.0111%15 Aug →
anubis11–130.0222%15 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0316%5 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.039%26 Jul →
inferno13–110.0323%26 Jul →
anubis13–160.0924%17 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0116%17 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0118%13 Jul →
cache13–100.0337%13 Jul →
anubis13–60.0918%13 Jul →
anubis17–19-0.0510%6 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0223%6 Jul →
cache13–100.0729%4 Jul →
inferno13–80.0813%2 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0022%29 Jun →
dust213–10.0415%15 Jun →
nuke13–30.0316%15 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0324%7 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0621%7 Jun →
dust212–160.0117%31 May →
inferno11–130.0231%31 May →
inferno11–130.0213%26 May →
nuke13–90.0229%24 May →
anubis8–130.0117%24 May →
dust29–130.0225%4 May →
anubis10–13-0.0823%3 May →
inferno13–80.0121%27 Apr →
nuke10–130.0131%20 Apr →
anubis13–100.0312%15 Apr →
overpass13–8-0.0117%13 Apr →
inferno13–50.0418%13 Apr →
inferno15–190.0529%8 Apr →
inferno13–10.027%4 Mar →
nuke13–90.0018%25 Feb →
anubis14–16-0.0116%8 Feb →
mirage13–60.0122%21 Dec →
dust213–60.0322%21 Dec →
nuke13–80.0117%21 Dec →
inferno7–130.0222%15 Dec →
train10–13-0.0217%8 Dec →
nuke8–13-0.0613%4 Dec →
ancient3–13-0.0420%30 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0117%30 Nov →
nuke11–130.0016%28 Nov →
inferno13–4-0.0510%28 Nov →
overpass13–10.0534%28 Nov →
inferno19–160.0515%19 Nov →
train13–40.0431%12 Nov →
inferno13–60.0416%7 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0225%5 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0229%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0118%19 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0314%19 Oct →
nuke13–70.0616%19 Oct →
nuke13–80.0121%15 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0416%8 Oct →
train13–30.1019%6 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0421%28 Sept →
inferno10–20.0233%28 Sept →
nuke13–160.0511%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0321%21 Sept →
train16–19-0.0027%11 Sept →
nuke25–230.0417%9 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0318%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.038%20 Aug →
dust213–110.0914%20 Aug →
mirage16–130.0415%11 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0117%11 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0116%3 Aug →
dust213–100.0322%3 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0530%1 Aug →
dust213–160.0018%1 Aug →
nuke13–60.0816%1 Aug →
nuke13–20.0721%29 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0025%23 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0123%23 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0420%21 Jul →
train13–90.0821%21 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0314%20 Jul →
overpass2–13-0.0214%20 Jul →
nuke13–60.0923%20 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0431%12 Jul →
dust213–160.0119%26 Jun →
inferno13–80.017%26 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0219%22 Jun →
dust210–130.0321%22 Jun →
nuke11–130.0324%18 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.