BOT Cabe

BOT Cabe — CS2 Stats

76561198012026459[U:1:51760731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,981Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,557Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#83354 of 232849 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,241 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 23 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,557 +3,674 23 May16 Sept · 16 days played
15,88319,557peak 19,55723 May16 Sept
19,852Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,241Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-05-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,241
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,557
  • +1,513 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,135 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 443 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBOT CabeFACEITLevel 6 · 1,241 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,557 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,241csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning52
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51436Last 10051%Win rateLWTWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 1343 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility7.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 57% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning5.2
Utility7.4
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.1

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time610ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy10.0%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 9 Jun
29%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 18 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 18mirageWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2081240%-0.04
nukeS1812667%-0.00
infernoB179853%-0.02
cacheB157847%-0.03
ancientA149564%-0.03
mirageC83538%-0.01
overpass41325%-0.03
train32167%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

398Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
77.1ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2969%1.0614.9
Nuke2945%0.8713.3
Inferno2752%0.9113.2
Overpass2070%0.9913.8
Mirage1828%0.8614.4
Dust21464%0.8514.4
Vertigo1346%0.8112.3
Anubis922%0.7713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
65.8%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
606msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
11.37HE damage / grenade
17.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.3347% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0421% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–160.018%16 Sept
dust213–4-0.083%16 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0015%16 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0115%16 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0612%10 Sept
ancient13–30.037%10 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0613%5 Sept
cache11–13-0.0513%5 Sept
dust210–13-0.0926%5 Sept
cache13–20.0513%5 Sept
nuke13–20.0915%5 Sept
inferno5–00.0715%5 Sept
cache13–11-0.078%18 Aug
dust216–14-0.0410%18 Aug
inferno15–15-0.007%18 Aug
cache10–13-0.096%18 Aug
cache15–15-0.049%15 Aug
mirage13–110.008%15 Aug
ancient13–20.0010%15 Aug
dust213–40.0110%15 Aug
inferno13–00.0510%15 Aug
train13–8-0.086%15 Aug
ancient0–13-0.090%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.066%14 Aug
dust210–130.0417%14 Aug
nuke13–6-0.043%14 Aug
inferno5–13-0.079%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.094%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0513%8 Aug
dust27–13-0.0713%8 Aug
inferno13–20.056%8 Aug
ancient13–9-0.039%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0412%8 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0513%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.108%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.062%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0114%4 Aug
cache13–3-0.0910%4 Aug
inferno15–15-0.049%4 Aug
ancient13–70.030%4 Aug
cache2–13-0.058%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0116%23 Jul
dust213–10-0.017%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0523%23 Jul
ancient13–50.0319%23 Jul
nuke13–40.028%23 Jul
inferno11–00.005%23 Jul
nuke11–13-0.009%23 Jul
dust215–15-0.0316%23 Jul
inferno16–12-0.045%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0513%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.076%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0011%18 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0810%18 Jul
nuke13–80.0210%18 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0429%18 Jul
train11–130.029%7 Jul
dust213–10-0.006%7 Jul
vertigo3–13-0.120%7 Jul
cache13–6-0.039%7 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0215%26 Jun
overpass5–13-0.019%26 Jun
inferno13–90.0513%26 Jun
mirage6–130.0517%26 Jun
nuke13–110.0311%26 Jun
ancient16–14-0.046%26 Jun
dust22–13-0.1118%26 Jun
dust213–10-0.059%22 Jun
inferno13–16-0.109%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.045%22 Jun
nuke16–120.0010%15 Jun
train13–100.0313%15 Jun
dust210–130.0311%15 Jun
cache2–13-0.0413%15 Jun
inferno7–13-0.074%12 Jun
mirage5–13-0.058%12 Jun
overpass1–13-0.118%12 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0417%12 Jun
dust21–13-0.067%12 Jun
overpass13–50.0310%12 Jun
cache11–13-0.0416%12 Jun
cache13–70.0213%11 Jun
nuke3–13-0.043%11 Jun
cache5–13-0.0518%9 Jun
nuke13–50.1012%9 Jun
inferno13–11-0.058%9 Jun
dust213–7-0.0215%9 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0517%9 Jun
cache13–40.033%9 Jun
dust25–13-0.0415%6 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0411%6 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0713%6 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0616%6 Jun
dust213–30.009%6 Jun
nuke13–60.018%6 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0117%6 Jun
dust215–15-0.0315%23 May
nuke13–6-0.088%23 May
nuke13–11-0.0211%23 May
inferno10–130.0014%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →