Nausicaä

Nausicaä — CS2 Stats

MQ76561198008641733[U:1:48376005]Steam profile ↗

3,585Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,463Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1166 of 13609 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,245 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNausicaäFACEITLevel 10 · 2,245 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,463 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning59
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60355Last 10060%Win rateWWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression6.7
Utility5.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time480ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–10
130Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
115In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 25infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2517868%0.02
dust2A2314961%0.02
nukeA127558%0.04
ancientA95456%0.01
anubisS96367%0.01
cacheS96367%0.02
infernoD62433%-0.00
train330100%0.11
vertigo2020%0.08
office1010%0.04
overpass1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,007Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
75.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25951%1.0314.8
Anubis17849%1.1116.2
Dust213649%1.0214.9
Inferno13354%1.1115.9
Ancient13353%1.1615.5
Nuke8558%1.1617.0
Vertigo3047%1.2017.3
Train2952%1.0515.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
488msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.45HE damage / grenade
9.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2799% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0128%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0523%26 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0216%26 Aug
inferno11–130.0942%25 Aug
nuke9–130.0219%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0713%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0541%25 Aug
anubis13–90.0114%25 Aug
dust213–2-0.0125%25 Aug
cache13–40.0620%24 Aug
cache13–110.0422%24 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0316%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0133%24 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0119%24 Aug
dust23–1-0.010%23 Aug
cache9–130.0026%23 Aug
cache11–130.0526%23 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0020%23 Aug
nuke13–70.0715%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0419%22 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0710%22 Aug
mirage13–80.0213%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0324%22 Aug
ancient13–110.0620%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0215%21 Aug
nuke13–60.0521%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.047%20 Aug
mirage13–60.1325%20 Aug
anubis13–90.0624%19 Aug
anubis13–110.0721%19 Aug
dust213–50.0514%19 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0115%19 Aug
cache4–13-0.0916%18 Aug
dust23–10-0.0310%17 Aug
ancient12–120.0528%17 Aug
mirage11–130.0234%17 Aug
nuke3–130.0113%17 Aug
dust213–10.1534%17 Aug
office7–130.0432%17 Aug
nuke4–00.0529%17 Aug
dust213–10.1031%17 Aug
mirage8–20.1516%17 Aug
train11–60.1233%17 Aug
train13–50.0725%17 Aug
cache13–20.0528%17 Aug
nuke13–50.0528%17 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0716%17 Aug
mirage13–30.0515%17 Aug
mirage13–90.1224%16 Aug
mirage13–1-0.030%16 Aug
dust213–100.0315%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0125%16 Aug
dust20–7-0.0929%16 Aug
dust212–12-0.0132%15 Aug
dust213–90.0719%15 Aug
train10–00.1446%15 Aug
vertigo6–130.0524%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0224%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0543%15 Aug
mirage9–130.0017%15 Aug
anubis13–100.1536%15 Aug
mirage13–60.0529%15 Aug
dust213–50.1314%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0129%15 Aug
dust210–130.0330%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0226%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.0315%15 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0441%15 Aug
inferno3–130.0819%14 Aug
dust26–130.0629%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0616%14 Aug
dust213–90.0426%14 Aug
ancient13–00.049%14 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0120%14 Aug
inferno1–13-0.040%13 Aug
mirage13–50.1334%13 Aug
nuke9–20.108%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0533%12 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0922%12 Aug
dust213–80.1337%12 Aug
cache13–50.0323%12 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0219%12 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0422%12 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0219%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0319%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0312%11 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0015%11 Aug
nuke13–110.0136%11 Aug
dust213–70.028%11 Aug
nuke8–130.0414%10 Aug
mirage13–60.0711%10 Aug
nuke13–110.0325%10 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0721%10 Aug
nuke9–130.0417%9 Aug
ancient13–110.0515%9 Aug
overpass4–130.0321%9 Aug
vertigo12–120.1229%9 Aug
cache13–90.0532%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0220%9 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →