Kultamuna

Kultamuna — CS2 Stats

76561198005760326[U:1:45494598]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

672Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,865Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#78638 of 238279 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,429 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 72 days played since 13 Feb 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +4,664 11 Apr19 Mar · 3 days played
14,99919,999peak 19,99911 Apr19 Mar
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,429Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
72Days played since 2025-02-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,429
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,860), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.7%46.8%48.3%8.6% short
Shot accuracy9.7%13.0%13.2%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.13 short
Match win rate42.3%46.3%46.9%4.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKultamunaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,429 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,429csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning61
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time607ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 11.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 4 Apr
26%Best headshot accuracy · 16–19 · nuke, 4 Apr
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 17 Apr
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 3 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 24ancientWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC28111739%-0.01
nukeA2415963%0.00
ancientC1971237%-0.02
dust2C94544%-0.03
mirage4040%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.01
train43175%-0.03
cache32167%-0.01
inferno31233%-0.05
brewery110100%-0.01
office110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,135Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
2,521Matches
42.3%Match win rate
39.7%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
5,683MVPs
1,103Hours (in match)
2,627Bombs planted
1,033Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,702
AWP3,626
P902,245
AUG1,130

Lifetime map wins

10,620nuke
1,916dust2
1,267inferno
358train
261vertigo
120cbble
34dust
23italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

590Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
74.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis17753%1.0515.0
Nuke14061%1.1415.4
Ancient10945%0.9514.7
Dust27742%0.9114.2
Mirage4032%0.9313.3
Cache1771%1.2716.3
Train1275%0.8613.3
Inferno1127%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
597msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
63.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.84HE damage / grenade
11.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8797% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0317%21 Sept
anubis23–250.0512%14 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0611%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0511%31 Jul
anubis10–13-0.008%19 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0016%8 Jul
nuke13–60.0114%7 Jul
ancient13–40.058%7 Jul
cache13–4-0.0319%7 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0319%26 Jun
anubis6–130.015%2 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0512%24 May
mirage3–13-0.0322%20 May
cache2–13-0.0112%16 May
anubis6–13-0.019%16 May
cache13–80.0010%10 May
ancient13–8-0.027%9 May
nuke10–13-0.017%4 May
ancient13–7-0.0115%17 Apr
nuke16–19-0.0326%4 Apr
dust213–4-0.0214%3 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0124%3 Apr
dust213–4-0.006%21 Mar
nuke13–30.069%21 Mar
anubis13–10-0.0111%19 Mar
nuke13–60.0710%17 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0313%16 Mar
nuke13–50.0017%15 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0612%9 Mar
ancient9–13-0.026%7 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0220%7 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0512%7 Mar
anubis13–50.0117%23 Feb
anubis11–13-0.019%23 Feb
dust213–8-0.0316%16 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0113%16 Feb
mirage9–130.0020%14 Feb
anubis8–13-0.006%9 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0511%9 Feb
nuke10–130.0514%2 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0715%1 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0314%29 Jan
dust213–7-0.0114%29 Jan
anubis9–13-0.067%29 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0516%26 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0425%23 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0518%23 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0110%22 Jan
dust211–13-0.0413%22 Jan
anubis13–60.0614%16 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0416%10 Jan
dust26–130.0125%10 Jan
overpass16–140.0411%20 Dec
nuke13–40.0111%20 Dec
dust28–13-0.0516%20 Dec
overpass13–16-0.0110%12 Nov
ancient11–13-0.0621%2 Nov
overpass8–13-0.078%23 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0314%19 Oct
mirage5–130.0111%2 Oct
nuke13–80.046%25 Sept
train13–8-0.0211%31 Aug
brewery9–6-0.0117%18 Aug
overpass13–10-0.0116%29 Jul
anubis13–6-0.034%30 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0911%24 Jun
ancient10–13-0.017%7 Jun
nuke13–16-0.049%1 Jun
dust25–13-0.1111%29 May
nuke16–14-0.0116%28 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0110%28 Apr
ancient13–2-0.014%22 Apr
anubis13–5-0.058%22 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0318%11 Apr
anubis7–130.0714%11 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0522%11 Apr
anubis16–19-0.0013%11 Apr
ancient10–13-0.049%11 Apr
office13–5-0.0317%5 Apr
anubis13–2-0.108%5 Apr
anubis13–50.0712%4 Apr
train22–19-0.0215%4 Apr
ancient13–100.0216%4 Apr
anubis7–130.042%3 Apr
nuke13–80.0611%3 Apr
train13–10-0.029%25 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0217%22 Mar
ancient11–130.0413%20 Mar
anubis13–50.0412%11 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0010%9 Mar
nuke9–13-0.016%8 Mar
anubis13–6-0.027%7 Mar
anubis6–13-0.056%6 Mar
ancient13–110.0417%4 Mar
nuke5–13-0.034%4 Mar
dust29–130.0111%1 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0117%27 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0611%26 Feb
anubis13–90.048%20 Feb
train0–13-0.069%13 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →