nEWBOB

nEWBOB — CS2 Stats

GQ76561198005123632[U:1:44857904]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

659Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
536Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,789Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#63119 of 220473 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 659 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,789 -2,585 20 Apr13 Sept · 15 days played
20,78924,999peak 24,99920 Apr13 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-04-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,210 below peak (24,999)
  • -4,148 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,211 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate56.2%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy9.7%12.7%13.0%3.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.141.051.06above
Match win rate53.8%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnEWBOBFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,789 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning60
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54397Last 10054%Win rateLLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.1pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time545ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 4 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 27 Apr
422msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 27 Jul
13–1Biggest win · cache, 4 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L5Current streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 25overpassWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2517868%0.01
infernoB179853%0.01
anubisB157847%0.01
mirageA127558%0.02
ancientB115645%-0.01
overpassD62433%-0.01
train42250%0.01
vertigo32167%0.00
office31233%-0.02
dust2220100%0.02
shelter1010%0.12
boulder1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,247Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
1,160Matches
53.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
56.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
9.7%Shot accuracy
3,834MVPs
536Hours (in match)
617Bombs planted
909Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,481inferno
1,928dust2
1,126nuke
872cbble
747train
591vertigo
297office
296italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

72Matches
56%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
85.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1145%0.8916.3
Inferno1173%1.2418.8
Vertigo683%1.3817.2
Anubis475%1.2214.3
Overpass2100%0.8011.0
Ancient10%0.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
541msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
60.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
6.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6331% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–130.0018%9 Aug
shelter7–130.1219%2 Aug
boulder5–130.0423%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0510%28 Jul
inferno14–160.0614%28 Jul
inferno13–40.0415%27 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0215%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0614%27 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0217%27 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0218%27 Jul
ancient13–50.0416%23 Jul
cache13–90.0522%23 Jul
mirage13–40.0629%23 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0110%23 Jul
ancient13–60.0330%22 Jul
cache13–80.0137%22 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0315%21 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0121%21 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0428%20 Jul
anubis6–130.0216%20 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0315%15 Jul
ancient0–13-0.040%15 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0319%15 Jul
vertigo13–7-0.0124%8 Jul
cache13–60.0225%7 Jul
cache10–10.0133%7 Jul
cache13–70.0720%7 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0220%5 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0221%5 Jul
inferno4–130.0023%5 Jul
cache13–6-0.0018%5 Jul
cache10–130.0620%5 Jul
mirage13–7-0.019%30 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0211%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0514%30 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0220%25 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0417%25 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0220%24 Jun
mirage12–120.0112%24 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0416%22 Jun
overpass0–60.0133%22 Jun
anubis13–80.0518%22 Jun
train13–20.0619%21 Jun
anubis13–30.1018%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0924%17 Jun
cache13–10-0.0318%7 Jun
mirage13–40.0518%7 Jun
vertigo13–50.0217%3 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0119%3 Jun
anubis13–90.0511%1 Jun
cache13–50.0422%1 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0423%31 May
cache13–6-0.0026%31 May
anubis13–10-0.0220%28 May
mirage4–13-0.0120%27 May
anubis13–30.0022%27 May
mirage13–4-0.035%26 May
inferno1–13-0.078%20 May
cache13–50.1020%20 May
vertigo8–130.0121%20 May
anubis11–13-0.0321%20 May
mirage8–13-0.0216%20 May
overpass8–130.0229%18 May
anubis12–120.0519%18 May
cache13–40.1120%18 May
inferno13–100.0630%17 May
anubis6–130.0324%17 May
cache12–120.0520%17 May
anubis5–130.0629%13 May
office5–13-0.0711%13 May
office13–10-0.0017%13 May
cache10–13-0.0128%11 May
inferno13–70.0119%11 May
ancient13–9-0.0215%11 May
cache13–7-0.0515%6 May
cache11–13-0.0520%6 May
cache13–8-0.0320%6 May
anubis16–14-0.0711%5 May
cache13–11-0.0611%5 May
mirage13–100.1423%4 May
inferno11–130.0312%4 May
overpass12–2-0.0222%4 May
cache13–9-0.0611%4 May
cache13–10.0725%4 May
cache9–130.0418%4 May
cache13–40.0018%30 Apr
cache6–130.0014%30 Apr
cache11–130.0130%29 Apr
cache7–13-0.0229%29 Apr
inferno13–70.0943%27 Apr
ancient3–130.0123%27 Apr
inferno13–50.0622%26 Apr
dust213–90.0325%26 Apr
ancient12–12-0.0312%24 Apr
inferno10–130.0728%22 Apr
train1–13-0.0118%22 Apr
train13–4-0.0218%22 Apr
train4–13-0.0119%22 Apr
office12–120.0118%20 Apr
dust213–100.0119%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →