blu

blu — CS2 Stats

DE76561198004039473[U:1:43773745]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,295Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,742Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#523 of 18633 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,126 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbluFACEITLevel 9 · 2,126 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,742 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning61
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54397Last 10054%Win rateWWLWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression7.7
Utility3.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.1
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time510ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
112In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24121250%0.00
dust2D2481633%0.00
infernoA1912763%0.01
cacheS118373%0.00
ancientS96367%-0.00
nuke42250%0.02
anubis330100%0.04
overpass32167%0.02
train21150%0.03
fachwerk1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

629Matches
54%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
77.6ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4269%0.9514.6
Nuke2752%1.0716.4
Dust22544%0.9815.8
Ancient2446%0.9014.9
Overpass1050%0.9815.5
Mirage944%0.9917.6
Train367%1.2115.0
Vertigo333%0.9516.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
500msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
10.65HE damage / grenade
3.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4871 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0411% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0022%24 Aug
ancient13–90.0118%24 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0633%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0217%23 Aug
train1–13-0.0524%21 Aug
cache8–13-0.0816%19 Aug
fachwerk10–130.0619%19 Aug
anubis13–60.0918%19 Aug
ancient13–110.0620%19 Aug
mirage13–20.1620%17 Aug
inferno12–120.0823%17 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0318%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0413%16 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0711%15 Aug
nuke3–11-0.0118%15 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0311%15 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0314%15 Aug
dust213–100.0425%15 Aug
mirage7–130.0421%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0418%14 Aug
mirage13–20.0823%14 Aug
cache13–110.0123%14 Aug
mirage3–13-0.095%14 Aug
inferno13–40.047%14 Aug
dust213–90.0530%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0116%14 Aug
dust29–130.0629%14 Aug
ancient13–60.0416%13 Aug
cache13–110.0314%13 Aug
ancient13–80.0223%13 Aug
mirage13–90.0212%13 Aug
cache13–3-0.0126%13 Aug
dust212–12-0.0223%13 Aug
overpass8–13-0.007%12 Aug
train13–60.1014%12 Aug
mirage13–60.0116%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0315%11 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0313%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0416%2 Aug
inferno5–130.0221%2 Aug
nuke0–2-0.010%24 Jul
dust22–13-0.0217%24 Jul
nuke13–90.0818%24 Jul
dust213–70.0626%24 Jul
mirage16–140.0211%24 Jul
mirage7–4-0.0213%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.039%19 Jul
mirage0–3-0.030%19 Jul
inferno15–150.0114%19 Jul
cache13–100.0324%17 Jul
inferno13–110.0026%17 Jul
dust213–8-0.0115%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0316%6 Jul
dust28–130.0028%6 Jul
inferno8–13-0.1014%20 Jun
inferno13–80.0023%18 Jun
mirage13–50.0317%18 Jun
dust27–13-0.0123%18 Jun
cache13–50.1422%18 Jun
dust212–12-0.0214%16 Jun
mirage4–130.0324%16 Jun
mirage16–140.0219%16 Jun
mirage13–80.1124%16 Jun
inferno13–50.0727%16 Jun
dust210–130.0426%2 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0223%2 Jun
dust28–13-0.0025%27 May
overpass16–140.0214%27 May
dust211–130.0620%27 May
dust22–13-0.0722%26 May
cache3–13-0.0840%26 May
cache13–10-0.0424%26 May
dust213–40.1018%26 May
inferno13–80.0217%26 May
overpass13–110.0323%26 May
dust21–13-0.0750%23 May
dust27–13-0.0317%20 May
inferno13–8-0.0122%20 May
dust219–15-0.019%19 May
inferno9–130.0317%18 May
ancient6–13-0.0627%18 May
inferno13–8-0.0118%18 May
mirage3–13-0.0912%17 May
dust21–13-0.0421%17 May
mirage12–120.0829%17 May
inferno13–30.0122%15 May
dust213–90.0122%15 May
nuke13–110.0022%15 May
dust26–13-0.0122%15 May
ancient5–130.0337%12 May
mirage1–13-0.0829%12 May
inferno16–14-0.0314%10 May
inferno13–50.0416%10 May
cache3–13-0.0826%10 May
cache13–80.0622%10 May
dust213–10.0134%8 May
anubis13–50.0527%8 May
inferno8–130.1017%8 May
mirage8–13-0.0611%4 May
cache13–100.0417%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →