Hans Christian Andersen

Hans Christian Andersen — CS2 Stats

RU76561198003077842[U:1:42812114]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,254Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,520Top 10% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16308 of 251312 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,429 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,429 → 2,429
+15Tracked matches · now 1,254
+16.7ppWin rate · 43.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,520 -3,447 16 Feb – 12 Oct · 16 days played
25,52029,448peak 29,44816 Feb12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,429 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations
2,4292,429peak 2,42929 Aug23 Sept
29,655Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,429Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-02-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,429
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 71 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,928 below peak (29,448)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,480 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHans Christian AndersenFACEITLevel 10 · 2,429 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,520 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,429csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · −110ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time535ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–2 · debris, 26 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 13 Mar →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · dust2, 7 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · fachwerk, 26 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

wardenBest map · 89% over 9dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB126–650%-0.01
mirageC114–736%-0.00
dust2D103–730%-0.01
wardenS98–189%0.02
ancientA95–456%0.00
infernoA95–456%0.01
anubisA74–357%-0.01
nukeS65–183%0.04
alpineS65–183%-0.00
italy—32–167%0.01
stronghold—32–167%0.03
vertigo—30–30%-0.03
boulder—20–20%-0.01
overpass—20–20%0.01
office—21–150%-0.00
debris—11–0100%0.18
eldorado—11–0100%-0.03
fachwerk—11–0100%0.10
sanctum—11–0100%0.12
poseidon—10–10%-0.00
train—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,953Matches
64%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
32Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26565%1.1415.3
Nuke4871%1.5016.9
Ancient4363%1.1115.6
Anubis4040%0.9114.3
Mirage4045%1.0015.5
Train3566%1.2917.5
Inferno3361%1.1216.2
Overpass1567%1.1114.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
489msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
5.39HE damage / grenade
6.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6783% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache16–14-0.0311%12 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0120%12 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0122%11 Oct →
nuke11–130.0722%9 Oct →
mirage13–10.0111%9 Oct →
dust213–30.0243%7 Oct →
nuke13–90.0730%4 Oct →
boulder8–130.0723%4 Aug →
anubis13–100.0623%4 Aug →
cache13–90.0726%4 Aug →
cache6–13-0.084%3 Aug →
debris9–20.1819%26 Jul →
eldorado9–7-0.0333%26 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0225%26 Jul →
boulder2–13-0.107%26 Jul →
fachwerk13–00.1060%26 Jul →
warden13–30.0620%5 Jul →
cache13–00.0423%5 Jul →
ancient13–3-0.0110%3 Jul →
italy6–13-0.043%3 Jul →
stronghold13–20.0344%3 Jul →
warden13–20.039%3 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0360%3 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0412%3 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0314%22 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0610%22 Jun →
overpass7–130.000%19 Jun →
mirage26–280.000%19 Jun →
warden11–10-0.0220%18 Jun →
alpine13–8-0.0223%18 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0034%18 Jun →
vertigo1–13-0.065%16 Jun →
cache13–80.0718%16 Jun →
sanctum9–30.1221%10 Jun →
poseidon7–9-0.0019%3 Jun →
cache3–13-0.027%3 Jun →
mirage2–130.0235%3 Jun →
overpass8–130.029%3 Jun →
mirage0–13-0.0236%3 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0120%23 Apr →
ancient14–16-0.0329%20 Apr →
inferno13–60.0022%19 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.026%19 Apr →
mirage6–130.0233%18 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0530%18 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0621%17 Apr →
anubis0–2-0.050%17 Apr →
dust213–110.0416%17 Apr →
dust215–150.0217%17 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.038%17 Apr →
mirage0–5-0.0343%17 Apr →
inferno11–130.0620%16 Apr →
ancient13–80.0328%16 Apr →
alpine11–130.0015%16 Apr →
warden8–13-0.0522%16 Apr →
warden13–100.0623%16 Apr →
warden13–30.0810%13 Apr →
nuke13–30.000%13 Apr →
inferno13–80.0219%12 Apr →
nuke13–30.0122%12 Apr →
ancient13–80.0212%12 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0316%12 Apr →
inferno8–130.0127%12 Apr →
italy13–50.0218%11 Apr →
stronghold13–80.0118%9 Apr →
train12–12-0.0116%9 Apr →
mirage2–130.0023%9 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0426%8 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0922%8 Apr →
vertigo10–13-0.0417%8 Apr →
vertigo12–120.0117%8 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0119%8 Apr →
anubis13–80.0018%13 Mar →
stronghold6–130.0416%13 Mar →
dust20–13-0.03100%13 Mar →
anubis13–4-0.0218%13 Mar →
inferno13–30.0121%10 Mar →
mirage15–15-0.0317%7 Mar →
dust28–130.030%7 Mar →
office13–8-0.0128%6 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0212%5 Mar →
anubis11–130.0018%5 Mar →
warden13–60.0117%3 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0218%2 Mar →
dust212–120.0125%2 Mar →
alpine13–20.1029%1 Mar →
office10–130.0025%26 Feb →
inferno13–100.0420%25 Feb →
nuke13–100.0918%25 Feb →
warden13–40.0227%24 Feb →
mirage13–50.0026%24 Feb →
anubis13–30.0024%22 Feb →
ancient4–130.0419%22 Feb →
alpine13–4-0.0221%19 Feb →
ancient13–70.0615%18 Feb →
italy13–30.0521%17 Feb →
alpine13–3-0.0214%17 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0418%16 Feb →
alpine13–2-0.0520%16 Feb →
warden13–30.0322%16 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.