Varmaan joku bugi?

Varmaan joku bugi? — CS2 Stats

FI76561198001449483[U:1:41183755]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,210Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,160Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#89307 of 237812 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,160 -1,950 18 Aug19 Sept · 21 days played
15,63221,486peak 21,48618 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,883 +0 30 Aug17 Sept · 4 observations
1,8831,883peak 1,88330 Aug17 Sept
22,463Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,883Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,883
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 118 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,326 below peak (21,486)
  • -2,326 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 840 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVarmaan joku bugi?PREMIER19,160 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,883csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning69
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37585Last 10037%Win rateWWLWLWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +81ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.6
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning6.9
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time649ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 19 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 22 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · train, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 16anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2781930%0.01
infernoA1610663%0.03
cacheC156940%0.03
nukeD134931%0.02
trainC83538%0.05
anubisD82625%-0.01
ancientD62433%-0.02
mirageC52340%0.01
vertigo2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,244Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
80.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust215352%1.0115.5
Ancient9963%1.0216.0
Inferno9844%1.1015.5
Nuke9362%1.0014.7
Anubis5954%1.0315.9
Mirage5545%0.9414.8
Train4262%1.1016.0
Overpass2055%0.8913.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
661msReaction time
51.6%T opening success
61.3%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
12.89HE damage / grenade
11.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0729%19 Sept
dust213–70.0717%19 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0324%18 Sept
inferno13–50.0611%18 Sept
dust24–13-0.0924%18 Sept
cache13–9-0.0210%18 Sept
ancient12–16-0.038%18 Sept
dust213–90.0623%18 Sept
dust215–150.009%18 Sept
dust213–10.1520%18 Sept
mirage13–100.0221%17 Sept
dust27–13-0.0412%17 Sept
dust28–13-0.0016%17 Sept
cache13–110.0618%17 Sept
train10–70.0418%17 Sept
dust210–130.0622%17 Sept
inferno11–130.0819%16 Sept
dust213–40.0813%16 Sept
nuke13–40.0814%16 Sept
cache13–80.0421%14 Sept
nuke13–50.0618%12 Sept
nuke12–160.0121%12 Sept
inferno5–130.0321%12 Sept
cache7–130.0726%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0012%12 Sept
nuke11–130.0319%12 Sept
dust24–13-0.1111%11 Sept
cache11–13-0.0014%11 Sept
anubis1–13-0.1014%8 Sept
dust210–130.0224%8 Sept
dust26–130.0410%5 Sept
train12–120.1617%5 Sept
train0–13-0.0631%5 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0314%5 Sept
cache3–130.0217%5 Sept
train13–60.1530%5 Sept
dust214–160.0926%5 Sept
ancient13–80.0115%5 Sept
inferno10–7-0.0319%5 Sept
anubis13–100.0513%5 Sept
cache12–120.0530%5 Sept
train13–00.1917%5 Sept
anubis7–130.0117%4 Sept
nuke8–130.019%4 Sept
mirage2–13-0.058%4 Sept
dust23–13-0.0015%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0211%4 Sept
train9–13-0.032%2 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0218%2 Sept
cache11–130.0715%2 Sept
train10–130.0116%2 Sept
mirage5–130.0117%2 Sept
cache13–160.0811%1 Sept
train10–13-0.0416%1 Sept
vertigo12–120.0515%1 Sept
inferno11–130.0613%1 Sept
nuke8–130.0711%29 Aug
dust213–110.0016%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0118%29 Aug
inferno13–50.0917%29 Aug
dust214–16-0.046%29 Aug
nuke9–130.0221%29 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0829%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0525%28 Aug
cache16–140.0014%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0514%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0222%28 Aug
inferno13–110.0423%28 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0928%28 Aug
inferno15–150.0113%27 Aug
cache16–120.0619%27 Aug
inferno13–90.1018%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.0533%27 Aug
inferno13–100.0523%26 Aug
dust213–70.1516%26 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0318%22 Aug
nuke5–130.0221%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0513%22 Aug
dust213–16-0.0319%22 Aug
nuke6–13-0.026%22 Aug
cache13–110.0513%22 Aug
cache8–13-0.0136%22 Aug
anubis2–130.0513%22 Aug
cache14–160.0516%22 Aug
ancient3–130.008%21 Aug
anubis1–13-0.053%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0327%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.0324%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0316%21 Aug
nuke13–50.0915%21 Aug
dust213–80.1014%21 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0418%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0117%20 Aug
anubis13–100.0223%19 Aug
nuke9–70.0817%19 Aug
inferno9–30.2217%19 Aug
vertigo4–90.0121%19 Aug
dust214–16-0.0121%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0318%18 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0216%18 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →