.#TašтY

.#TašтY — CS2 Stats

DE76561198001265793[U:1:41000065]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,214Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,126Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,047Top 25% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19892 of 247886 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,047 +2,085 3 Jul – 26 Sept · 29 days played
20,62225,733peak 25,7333 Jul26 Sept
25,849Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-07-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 686 below peak (25,733)
  • +1,211 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,085 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,953 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.6%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy12.9%13.0%13.3%0.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.211.061.07above
Match win rate47.1%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG.#TašтYFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,047 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning76
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateLLLLWLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.7
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch4.0

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.6
Utility7.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact6.3

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time526ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 9 Jul →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 4 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 18 Sept →
12–0Biggest win · inferno, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3820–1853%0.03
nukeA2012–860%0.04
cacheB209–1145%0.01
anubisB115–645%0.02
ancientS65–183%0.03
inferno—33–0100%0.06
mirage—10–10%0.13
overpass—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

85,515Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
4,420Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12.9%Shot accuracy
10,298MVPs
1,747Hours (in match)
6,788Bombs planted
1,093Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,643
AWP7,947
MP73,625
SSG 083,181
SG 5532,579
HE Grenade1,236

Lifetime map wins

17,849dust2
4,447nuke
4,036inferno
3,199vertigo
783train
262lake
163office
94cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

591Matches
52%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
93.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2843%1.3818.4
Dust21968%1.7020.0
Inferno1861%1.5618.8
Ancient1553%1.4418.4
Mirage825%0.8814.5
Nuke850%1.3322.6
Vertigo425%1.4422.0
Train10%1.2117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
528msReaction time
50.0%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
12.85HE damage / grenade
12.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0618%26 Sept →
nuke8–130.0429%25 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0415%25 Sept →
mirage10–130.1318%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0213%23 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0028%23 Sept →
dust215–150.0216%19 Sept →
dust213–60.0523%19 Sept →
cache13–80.0113%19 Sept →
cache13–30.0420%19 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0520%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0522%18 Sept →
nuke13–110.0115%18 Sept →
cache15–150.0418%18 Sept →
anubis7–130.0211%18 Sept →
nuke8–130.1226%18 Sept →
ancient13–60.0319%13 Sept →
cache13–100.0529%13 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0117%12 Sept →
dust213–30.1128%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0719%12 Sept →
dust215–150.0530%12 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0123%12 Sept →
dust211–130.0315%6 Sept →
nuke15–150.0517%6 Sept →
dust213–90.0738%6 Sept →
inferno12–0-0.0627%29 Aug →
ancient13–70.0415%22 Aug →
dust211–130.0014%22 Aug →
dust216–140.0121%14 Aug →
dust29–130.0117%14 Aug →
nuke9–130.0322%13 Aug →
dust213–100.0538%12 Aug →
dust22–130.0115%5 Aug →
ancient13–100.0122%5 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0418%5 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0113%5 Aug →
nuke9–130.0227%5 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0229%4 Aug →
dust213–100.0726%4 Aug →
nuke13–60.0916%4 Aug →
dust27–130.0924%1 Aug →
cache8–130.0214%1 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0724%1 Aug →
dust213–50.1124%31 Jul →
cache13–90.0716%31 Jul →
anubis13–70.0411%31 Jul →
inferno13–40.1533%30 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0219%29 Jul →
nuke13–80.1131%29 Jul →
dust29–130.0023%29 Jul →
dust213–40.0122%28 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0113%27 Jul →
nuke13–100.0017%27 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0315%27 Jul →
anubis15–150.0517%26 Jul →
nuke13–70.0311%26 Jul →
dust24–130.0131%24 Jul →
cache10–130.0824%24 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0318%24 Jul →
nuke13–50.1034%24 Jul →
dust213–40.0414%24 Jul →
anubis9–130.0222%18 Jul →
ancient13–60.0816%18 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0218%18 Jul →
dust213–90.0230%18 Jul →
anubis13–30.1332%18 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0114%18 Jul →
ancient13–80.057%18 Jul →
dust213–100.0327%14 Jul →
cache16–130.0225%14 Jul →
nuke13–90.0610%12 Jul →
anubis16–140.0114%12 Jul →
anubis13–60.0615%11 Jul →
dust213–110.0517%11 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0525%11 Jul →
dust213–80.0420%11 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0022%11 Jul →
inferno13–80.1124%11 Jul →
dust213–50.0513%10 Jul →
cache8–130.0117%10 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0016%10 Jul →
nuke10–130.0521%10 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0520%10 Jul →
cache13–40.0925%10 Jul →
dust216–140.0422%10 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0218%9 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0432%9 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0616%9 Jul →
dust213–50.1625%9 Jul →
cache13–100.0122%8 Jul →
dust29–130.0430%8 Jul →
nuke9–130.0015%4 Jul →
dust213–60.0422%4 Jul →
overpass6–130.0323%4 Jul →
dust27–130.0027%4 Jul →
nuke13–100.0742%4 Jul →
nuke13–110.0422%4 Jul →
dust213–110.0216%3 Jul →
dust213–70.0819%3 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.