✪ worst player

✪ worst player — CS2 Stats

AU76561198001057074[U:1:40791346]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,682Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,927Top 1% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1549 of 259984 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,197 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,927 +3,201 23 Jul – 1 Nov · 25 days played
25,09128,927peak 28,92723 Jul1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,197 +0 1 Sept – 20 Oct · 6 observations
2,1972,197peak 2,1971 Sept20 Oct
29,215Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,197Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,197
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 303 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,927
  • +2,575 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,836 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,073 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ worst playerFACEITLevel 10 · 2,197 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,927 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,197csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning74
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateLWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +5.6pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.7
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.4
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time514ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−6.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 12 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 6 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 2 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 19dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA1911–858%0.03
infernoC176–1135%0.04
cacheB168–850%0.04
ancientB158–753%0.04
nukeA148–657%0.05
dust2D93–633%0.01
mirageB84–450%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.00
rush_001—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,621Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
88.9ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis13042%1.2617.1
Ancient11057%1.4018.0
Nuke10555%1.4518.5
Inferno10447%1.3016.9
Mirage6050%1.1917.5
Vertigo5650%1.3517.0
Dust24542%1.1816.4
Train3067%1.4117.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
521msReaction time
48.0%T opening success
62.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
9.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0113%1 Nov →
nuke13–100.1012%1 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0219%1 Nov →
nuke14–160.0324%1 Nov →
cache5–130.0732%1 Nov →
mirage13–70.0819%1 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0117%1 Nov →
nuke16–120.0717%30 Oct →
dust22–130.0424%30 Oct →
cache13–90.0718%30 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.066%30 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0013%30 Oct →
ancient13–60.0114%30 Oct →
nuke13–50.0522%30 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0210%30 Oct →
cache5–13-0.1210%30 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0314%30 Oct →
inferno13–40.1517%26 Oct →
dust213–110.0317%26 Oct →
cache13–80.0319%26 Oct →
anubis13–100.0322%21 Oct →
ancient13–40.038%21 Oct →
inferno13–90.0810%21 Oct →
anubis13–20.0422%21 Oct →
inferno8–130.0116%21 Oct →
mirage13–30.0613%21 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0213%21 Oct →
anubis13–20.068%21 Oct →
inferno11–130.0118%3 Oct →
cache11–130.0121%3 Oct →
vertigo16–14-0.0011%2 Oct →
mirage13–50.0114%2 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0826%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0110%1 Oct →
inferno5–130.0123%1 Oct →
mirage14–160.0211%1 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.0213%1 Oct →
dust27–130.1220%23 Sept →
ancient7–130.0613%23 Sept →
inferno3–10-0.0126%22 Sept →
cache7–10.0521%22 Sept →
ancient6–10.0833%22 Sept →
anubis13–40.0317%20 Sept →
nuke15–150.0122%20 Sept →
nuke9–130.0623%18 Sept →
dust215–150.0113%18 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0019%18 Sept →
inferno10–130.0525%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0030%18 Sept →
cache16–12-0.019%12 Sept →
nuke13–80.1323%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.1018%12 Sept →
ancient5–130.0315%12 Sept →
anubis13–30.1015%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0029%12 Sept →
dust27–130.0215%12 Sept →
anubis13–90.0825%12 Sept →
ancient13–90.1011%12 Sept →
nuke10–130.0216%12 Sept →
cache13–10.2022%12 Sept →
ancient16–130.0016%9 Sept →
inferno13–10.056%9 Sept →
cache9–130.0811%6 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0433%6 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0314%6 Sept →
inferno14–160.0414%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0428%5 Sept →
dust213–100.0120%5 Sept →
anubis15–150.0221%5 Sept →
nuke11–130.0729%5 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0320%5 Sept →
ancient10–130.0629%5 Sept →
mirage11–130.0417%5 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0017%4 Sept →
nuke13–90.0023%4 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0114%4 Sept →
ancient11–00.0517%4 Sept →
cache13–30.1626%4 Sept →
anubis9–130.0313%3 Sept →
mirage13–50.0430%3 Sept →
inferno13–70.0539%3 Sept →
cache9–130.0217%26 Aug →
ancient13–110.0722%26 Aug →
inferno13–160.0621%26 Aug →
cache7–130.0014%22 Aug →
anubis13–80.0027%22 Aug →
nuke13–70.1535%22 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0011%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.0419%15 Aug →
inferno8–130.0015%15 Aug →
cache13–80.0821%7 Aug →
anubis13–80.1132%7 Aug →
inferno13–40.1126%7 Aug →
ancient6–130.0521%6 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0018%6 Aug →
nuke13–100.0440%6 Aug →
inferno13–110.0420%1 Aug →
anubis13–100.0428%1 Aug →
ancient11–130.0424%23 Jul →
inferno11–130.0430%23 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.