oOoCozzAoOo

oOoCozzAoOo — CS2 Stats

76561198000904493[U:1:40638765]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,314Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,374Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,173 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (67 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,314 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,374 -2,194 30 Jun – 28 Aug · 17 days played
16,53219,611peak 19,61130 Jun28 Aug
19,948Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,173Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-06-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,173
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 28 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,237 below peak (19,611)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,626 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoOoCozzAoOoFACEITLevel 5 · 1,173 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,374 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,173csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning46
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility5.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time647ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 710ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 16 Jul →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 10 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 13 Jul →
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2714–1352%-0.00
mirageA2212–1055%0.00
infernoA169–756%0.00
ancientA117–464%0.00
cacheC94–544%-0.02
nukeD93–633%0.02
anubisD51–420%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

783Matches
49%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
74.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11647%0.9813.9
Dust210354%1.1215.1
Inferno6146%1.0215.6
Ancient5149%0.9415.1
Nuke4048%1.1816.6
Overpass1631%0.9014.3
Train1258%0.9014.4
Anubis333%0.7813.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
650msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.94HE damage / grenade
10.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6776% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.026%20 Jul →
anubis7–130.0135%20 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0213%20 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0114%19 Jul →
inferno9–130.0621%19 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0327%19 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0116%18 Jul →
dust210–130.0118%18 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0311%18 Jul →
dust213–80.0024%18 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0310%18 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0714%18 Jul →
mirage16–140.0225%18 Jul →
dust27–130.0017%18 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0119%17 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0326%17 Jul →
ancient13–50.0826%17 Jul →
dust213–80.0123%17 Jul →
mirage10–130.0521%17 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0411%17 Jul →
cache13–70.0121%16 Jul →
nuke8–130.0124%16 Jul →
cache11–130.0526%16 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0220%16 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0512%16 Jul →
nuke11–130.0312%16 Jul →
mirage13–90.1622%16 Jul →
nuke13–70.0522%15 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0720%15 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0428%14 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0421%14 Jul →
cache15–15-0.0414%14 Jul →
inferno13–50.0617%14 Jul →
mirage13–100.0427%14 Jul →
dust213–60.0117%13 Jul →
dust213–40.0219%13 Jul →
dust216–120.0121%13 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0219%13 Jul →
dust213–60.0114%13 Jul →
anubis13–110.0114%13 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0217%13 Jul →
cache13–70.0016%12 Jul →
nuke9–130.0011%12 Jul →
nuke11–130.0727%12 Jul →
dust213–40.0327%12 Jul →
ancient13–110.0218%12 Jul →
cache0–13-0.0723%12 Jul →
mirage11–130.0410%11 Jul →
mirage15–150.0231%11 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0126%11 Jul →
inferno13–110.0213%11 Jul →
ancient13–30.0621%11 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0113%10 Jul →
dust215–150.0124%10 Jul →
inferno13–60.0115%10 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0029%10 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0818%10 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0312%10 Jul →
inferno13–70.0439%10 Jul →
mirage13–80.0520%10 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0118%9 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0410%9 Jul →
dust211–130.0129%9 Jul →
cache9–0-0.018%9 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0310%8 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0217%8 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0227%8 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0625%8 Jul →
dust219–160.0518%7 Jul →
inferno13–80.0423%7 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0618%7 Jul →
mirage13–50.019%6 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0222%6 Jul →
inferno2–00.010%6 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0122%6 Jul →
dust213–50.0625%6 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0121%5 Jul →
mirage13–60.0323%5 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0122%5 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0417%5 Jul →
mirage13–70.0116%5 Jul →
overpass7–13-0.0622%5 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0922%5 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0117%4 Jul →
dust29–130.0415%4 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0311%4 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0136%3 Jul →
ancient10–130.0116%2 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0527%2 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0024%2 Jul →
mirage13–90.0228%2 Jul →
ancient8–130.0418%2 Jul →
nuke13–110.0224%1 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0618%1 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0516%1 Jul →
nuke13–40.0112%1 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0123%1 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0022%30 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0523%30 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0323%30 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.