Karstenbb

Karstenbb — CS2 Stats

NO76561198000102004[U:1:39836276]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

143Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,564Blue band · top ~46.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,564 +7,069 19 Jun – 6 Oct · 18 days played
4,49513,333peak 13,33319 Jun6 Oct
13,360Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,769 below peak (13,333)
  • +3,035 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,436 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKarstenbbPREMIER11,564 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning58
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–43–6Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time622ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 3–7 · ancient, 9 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · cache, 12 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 24 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2215–768%0.02
infernoB2111–1052%0.02
ancientC176–1135%0.03
dust2C146–843%0.01
anubisA74–357%0.00
nukeD72–529%0.01
cacheS75–271%0.03
overpassC52–340%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
625msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
5.70HE damage / grenade
16.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–7-0.0020%6 Oct →
ancient3–70.185%9 Aug →
mirage13–40.0717%8 Aug →
nuke8–130.0620%7 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0018%7 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0515%7 Aug →
inferno13–20.0319%7 Aug →
dust213–20.0219%6 Aug →
anubis6–130.0512%6 Aug →
mirage7–130.0827%4 Aug →
cache13–80.0717%24 Jul →
dust213–50.0611%24 Jul →
ancient13–00.0921%23 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0123%23 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0618%22 Jul →
ancient13–30.0512%22 Jul →
cache13–80.0528%22 Jul →
ancient13–60.0623%22 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0317%22 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0121%22 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0213%21 Jul →
nuke13–30.0612%17 Jul →
cache8–130.0320%17 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0118%17 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0014%17 Jul →
ancient13–00.0718%17 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0023%16 Jul →
mirage13–90.0220%16 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0113%16 Jul →
inferno13–50.0713%15 Jul →
mirage13–20.0313%15 Jul →
mirage13–60.0916%14 Jul →
inferno11–130.0115%14 Jul →
nuke11–130.0022%14 Jul →
dust213–80.0817%14 Jul →
inferno7–130.0029%13 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0325%13 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0117%12 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0225%12 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0023%12 Jul →
cache3–00.0550%12 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0733%12 Jul →
ancient9–130.0415%10 Jul →
dust27–130.0215%10 Jul →
dust28–130.0328%10 Jul →
anubis13–50.0219%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.0117%10 Jul →
mirage13–50.0210%10 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0415%9 Jul →
inferno13–100.0216%9 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0311%9 Jul →
inferno13–80.1224%26 Jun →
overpass5–130.1122%26 Jun →
ancient13–20.0214%26 Jun →
ancient15–150.0923%25 Jun →
dust25–130.0523%25 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0315%24 Jun →
inferno16–13-0.0726%24 Jun →
anubis13–90.0315%24 Jun →
inferno8–130.0017%19 Jun →
overpass10–130.0131%19 Jun →
mirage16–140.0113%19 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0319%19 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0511%19 Jun →
dust24–13-0.1027%19 Jun →
inferno13–70.0424%19 Jun →
overpass13–100.0616%18 Jun →
anubis14–16-0.0117%18 Jun →
dust28–130.0327%18 Jun →
nuke13–110.0422%18 Jun →
ancient8–130.1018%18 Jun →
inferno13–80.0921%18 Jun →
dust213–40.1018%18 Jun →
mirage13–50.0426%17 Jun →
inferno13–80.0620%17 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0420%17 Jun →
inferno13–30.0920%17 Jun →
mirage13–10.1110%17 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0018%16 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0427%16 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0127%16 Jun →
ancient13–30.0522%15 Jun →
mirage14–160.1416%15 Jun →
mirage1–8-0.0115%15 Jun →
cache13–6-0.0022%13 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0720%13 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0626%13 Jun →
inferno16–13-0.0114%13 Jun →
cache5–130.0116%11 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0124%11 Jun →
overpass12–12-0.0324%10 Jun →
ancient6–130.0022%10 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0620%9 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0114%9 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0419%9 Jun →
dust212–12-0.058%8 Jun →
inferno9–130.0218%8 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0128%8 Jun →
cache13–10.0215%8 Jun →
inferno12–12-0.0322%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.