Neon

Neon — CS2 Stats

76561197999170596[U:1:38904868]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,930Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,054Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91183 of 239869 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,862 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Aug 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 7 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,054 -1,069 7 May22 Aug · 12 days played
19,05421,353peak 21,3537 May22 Aug
21,470Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,862Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-05-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,862
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 139 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,299 below peak (21,353)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 946 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNeonFACEITLevel 8 · 1,862 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,054 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,862csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning58
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45487Last 10045%Win rateLLLTLLLWTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 10

  • 163 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility7.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.8
Utility7.1
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time636ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 31 Jul
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 10 May
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 7 Jul
13–0Biggest win · cache, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 19dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB21101148%0.00
ancientA1911858%0.01
infernoC1981142%0.01
dust2D1441029%0.01
mirageC146843%0.03
anubisB63350%-0.01
overpass42250%0.02
nuke31233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,780Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18345%0.9714.5
Inferno17356%0.9914.2
Mirage10945%0.9614.7
Anubis10348%0.9213.8
Overpass7956%0.9914.2
Dust24755%1.1515.5
Cache4351%0.9814.5
Nuke3653%0.9112.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
630msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
57.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
12.83HE damage / grenade
16.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1422% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0217%22 Aug
ancient11–130.0123%22 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0112%22 Aug
mirage15–150.0114%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0412%22 Aug
inferno5–120.029%22 Aug
mirage8–130.0713%22 Aug
anubis13–4-0.069%21 Aug
dust215–15-0.0536%18 Aug
anubis15–150.0024%17 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0111%17 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0313%16 Aug
cache13–90.0214%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0117%15 Aug
cache9–13-0.0521%15 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0211%12 Aug
ancient13–60.0418%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0620%11 Aug
inferno13–110.0514%11 Aug
ancient13–40.0914%11 Aug
cache4–13-0.0419%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0620%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0617%9 Aug
cache9–13-0.0425%4 Aug
ancient13–90.1214%4 Aug
inferno9–130.0617%4 Aug
ancient13–20.087%31 Jul
cache13–00.1817%31 Jul
mirage13–110.0113%31 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0829%31 Jul
cache15–150.0210%31 Jul
anubis7–130.0116%31 Jul
mirage7–130.0119%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0615%30 Jul
dust215–150.0220%30 Jul
nuke1–13-0.030%30 Jul
dust213–60.0536%30 Jul
cache13–70.0228%30 Jul
mirage9–00.1033%30 Jul
dust211–130.0215%30 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0229%29 Jul
dust25–130.0017%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0212%28 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0139%28 Jul
cache15–150.0714%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0217%10 Jul
ancient16–130.0115%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0214%10 Jul
inferno6–130.0318%7 Jul
cache10–13-0.0424%6 Jul
cache13–6-0.0216%5 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0217%5 Jul
cache13–50.0230%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0322%5 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0322%4 Jul
dust213–7-0.0215%4 Jul
mirage15–150.0514%3 Jul
inferno11–130.0520%2 Jul
inferno13–70.0315%2 Jul
overpass13–100.0617%2 Jul
ancient13–70.0214%14 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0627%11 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0123%7 Jun
dust210–13-0.0115%7 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0419%4 Jun
cache13–100.0319%4 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0223%1 Jun
cache13–6-0.0122%1 Jun
anubis13–90.0213%25 May
cache8–13-0.0426%25 May
cache7–13-0.0125%25 May
anubis2–130.0021%25 May
dust213–20.0714%24 May
nuke13–9-0.0420%24 May
dust29–130.0725%24 May
cache13–9-0.0230%23 May
ancient13–70.0116%23 May
inferno14–16-0.0318%23 May
overpass7–13-0.0127%22 May
inferno13–90.0112%22 May
overpass13–50.0915%18 May
mirage13–10.1315%17 May
dust213–80.0421%17 May
ancient13–70.0120%17 May
ancient11–13-0.0317%15 May
inferno13–80.0531%15 May
dust26–13-0.0411%14 May
inferno10–13-0.0328%14 May
ancient3–13-0.0310%14 May
inferno13–90.0310%14 May
inferno8–13-0.0413%13 May
mirage13–90.0433%13 May
ancient11–130.0122%10 May
cache13–7-0.0216%10 May
cache5–13-0.0111%10 May
cache13–00.0650%10 May
cache8–13-0.0425%10 May
ancient16–130.0319%8 May
cache7–13-0.0415%8 May
inferno13–7-0.0114%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →