Lindbergyo

Lindbergyo — CS2 Stats

NO76561197997353307[U:1:37087579]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,075Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,897Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating5,000Light Blue band · top ~78.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 14 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,000 +410 16 Jul19 Sept · 25 days played
4,5906,814peak 6,81416 Jul19 Sept
6,992Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-07-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,814 below peak (6,814)
  • -1,231 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,584), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate45.8%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy7.8%12.2%11.3%3.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.920.980.990.08 short
Match win rate40.5%43.3%43.9%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLindbergyoFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER5,000 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48493Last 10048%Win rateLLLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.2
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time621ms−75ms
first ⅓ avg 696ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 8–13 · cache, 14 Sept
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 9 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 4 Sept
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 4 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 14dust2Weakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32141844%-0.00
dust2C1871139%-0.01
infernoB179853%-0.01
cacheB147750%0.01
nukeA148657%-0.00
ancient330100%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.22
anubis1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,050Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,904Matches
40.5%Match win rate
45.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
7.8%Shot accuracy
5,818MVPs
954Hours (in match)
2,951Bombs planted
590Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,468dust2
4,117inferno
3,001nuke
990vertigo
454train
28cbble
9italy
8office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
40%Win rate
0.55Avg K/D
ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
29.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
611msReaction time
52.5%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.76Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
6.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–16-0.0513%19 Sept
dust24–13-0.0326%19 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0716%19 Sept
dust213–11-0.0323%19 Sept
cache12–160.0117%18 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0521%18 Sept
dust213–16-0.038%15 Sept
mirage9–130.0621%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0723%15 Sept
cache8–130.1428%14 Sept
nuke13–80.0414%14 Sept
dust27–13-0.0325%14 Sept
nuke13–80.0212%14 Sept
nuke13–90.0217%10 Sept
inferno13–80.1110%10 Sept
dust22–13-0.0513%10 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0419%10 Sept
dust25–13-0.0414%10 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0616%6 Sept
dust213–50.0218%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0313%5 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0212%5 Sept
inferno6–13-0.098%4 Sept
vertigo4–9-0.2222%4 Sept
inferno2–9-0.1713%25 Aug
dust22–130.0111%13 Aug
dust213–100.0317%13 Aug
mirage3–130.0713%13 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0426%12 Aug
cache13–8-0.0418%12 Aug
dust213–100.0418%12 Aug
dust213–60.0220%11 Aug
cache5–13-0.0223%11 Aug
nuke10–130.025%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0812%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0118%10 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0117%9 Aug
ancient9–10.0714%9 Aug
inferno13–70.0228%9 Aug
cache5–130.0413%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0624%9 Aug
nuke11–13-0.047%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0221%8 Aug
dust213–110.0320%8 Aug
cache13–80.0510%8 Aug
dust213–40.0725%8 Aug
cache13–6-0.0123%8 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0411%8 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0415%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0419%8 Aug
dust215–15-0.0114%7 Aug
cache13–11-0.0120%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0518%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0020%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0713%7 Aug
inferno11–130.0319%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.1214%7 Aug
cache7–13-0.0723%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0312%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0020%6 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0813%4 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0412%4 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0124%4 Aug
mirage13–20.1019%4 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0720%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0616%3 Aug
inferno4–0-0.030%3 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0124%3 Aug
inferno13–40.0113%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0121%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0117%2 Aug
nuke7–13-0.038%29 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0319%29 Jul
nuke13–40.0112%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0115%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0520%29 Jul
mirage9–130.0021%29 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0211%28 Jul
nuke15–150.0012%28 Jul
inferno16–130.0217%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.047%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0311%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.045%28 Jul
cache13–40.0616%26 Jul
cache13–70.0513%26 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0116%22 Jul
inferno13–40.0126%22 Jul
mirage13–20.0320%22 Jul
cache13–160.0014%22 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0211%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0816%22 Jul
cache15–15-0.0015%20 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0215%20 Jul
mirage11–130.0018%20 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0414%20 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0917%20 Jul
dust24–130.0213%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0112%16 Jul
inferno13–110.0811%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0415%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →